1. Porovnávací způsob oceňování majetku praktické příklady Ing. David Slavata, Ph.D. Oceňování majetku A

2. Principle It is necessary to have at least two real estates with nearly no differences (flat A, flat B) It is necessary to have at least two real estates with nearly no differences (flat A, flat B) Flat A (valuated) the unknown price, the other especially technical and legal parametres are known Flat A (valuated) the unknown price, the other especially technical and legal parametres are known Flat B (comaprative) known price, known technical and legal parameters Flat B (comaprative) known price, known technical and legal parameters

3. Methods Direct comparative Direct comparative Professional balance sheet Professional balance sheet Using the direct increases and reductions Using the direct increases and reductions Using the coefficients Using the coefficients Direct with no representative Direct with no representative Undirect with representative estate Undirect with representative estate

4. Sample Appreciate the multiflat house in the village Svatoňovice by comparative approach. Built from bricks, insulated. In the house there are 4 similar flats 2+1. Appartement area 57m2. No balcony. Use the comapartive methodes. The year of construction: 1963.

5. The advertising database Flat č. LokalityRoomsPrice Techn. condition 1 Velké Heraltice sádek 2+1390000- 2Vítkov3+1650000+ 3Vítkov2+1580000+ Appreci ated flat Svatoňovice2+1?-

6. CV1 = 1/n x SUM SP i Professional balance sheet methode

7. Comparative Value FlatLokalityRoomsPrice correction 0,85 1 Velké Heraltice sádek 2+1390000 2Vítkov3+1650000 3Vítkov2+1580000 Comparative Value

8. Advantages and disadvantages Simple methode Simple methode Assumption of high homogenity of flats Assumption of high homogenity of flats Timeliness Timeliness Sample of usage: Flats for instance Sample of usage: Flats for instance

9. Methode of comparison, 1.Direct. Using of increases and reductions due the diferences between valuated and comparable flats. 2. Using the coefficients express of differences.

10. Direct methode using increases and reductions CV2a = [ (SP A +/- sum IRA i ) x W 1 + (SPB +/-sumIRB i ) x W 2 +….+(SPX +/- sum IRX i ) x W z ] / W 1 + W 2 + … + W z

11. Advertising database Flat č. LokalityRoomsPrice Techn. condition 1 Velké Heraltice sádek 2+1390000- 2Vítkov3+1650000+ 3Vítkov2+1580000+ Appreci ated flat Svatoňovice2+1?-

12. Calculation CV = (+390 x 0,85 + 50 +0 + 39 +650 x 0,85 – 100 – 50 – 50 +650 x 0,85 – 100 – 50 – 50 +580 x 0,85 - 100 + 0 – 50) / 3 CV = Kč/flat

13. Using the coefficients express of differences CV2b = sum ISPC i / n ISPC i = SP i / Id i Id i = k1 x k2 x k3 x…..x kn

14. Procedure 1. To get the database with the comparative fltas as homogenuos as possible. 2. The bid prices of flats should be corrected by the reduction coefficient. 3. Selection of signs of differences should be set the coefficients of differences (k) 4. By multiplicating of coefficients we get the Indexes of differences for each comparative flat. 5. The selling price should be devided by the Index of difference for each flat. 6. By the average of adapted selling prices we get the comparative value of the the flat.

15. Sestavení databáze Flat č. LokalityRoomsPrice Techn. condition 1 Velké Heraltice sádek 2+1390000- 2Vítkov3+1650000+ 3Vítkov2+1580000+ Appreci ated flat Svatoňovice2+1?-

16. Creation of coefficients K1………..Rooms K2………..Lokality K3……….Technical condition

17. Value of coefficients K1: 2+1……..1,00 3+1………1,12 K2: Svatoňovice.1,00 Vítkov……..1,12 Sádek………0,90 K3 Standard…1,00 -……………0,90 +…………1,1

18. Calculation Č.Cena Korekce 0,85 K1K2K3IPrice 1390331,51,00………… 2650552,51,12………… 35804931,00………… Comparative Value …

19. Děkuji za pozornost