Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Magnetic Field Amplification in Astrophysical Shocks 1)There is convincing evidence for.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Magnetic Field Amplification in Astrophysical Shocks 1)There is convincing evidence for."— Presentation transcript:

1 Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Magnetic Field Amplification in Astrophysical Shocks 1)There is convincing evidence for large B-fields at outer shocks in supernova remnants: B shock ~ 200-500  G >> B ISM (e.g., Cowsik & Sarkar 80; Berezhko, Voelk & co-workers; Vink & Laming) a)Broad-band fits: radio/TeV ratio gives limits on B-field b)Sharp X-ray edges: large B  short electron lifetimes  narrow structures 2)Most likely, B-field amplification is an intrinsic part of efficient shock acceleration, i.e. nonlinear diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) 3)Simple basic idea: Cosmic ray streaming instability creates strong turbulence in nonlinear shocks and produces  B/B >> 1. BUT, plasma physics hard (impossible?) when  B/B >> 1. First attempts with simplified approaches: Bell & Lucek 01,04; Amato & Blasi 06; Blasi, Amato & Caprioli 06; Vladimirov, Ellison & Bykov 06; Blandford – Bootstrap model 4)B-fields set maximum CR energy, determine synchrotron emission, and produce losses for relativistic electrons  understanding B-amplification essential for modeling broad-band emission from sources  will determine IC/p-p emission ratio at GeV-TeV energies If physics of particle acceleration in SNRs is typical, unexpectedly large magnetic fields, generated by shocks, may exist in radio jets, shocks in galaxy clusters, GRBs, etc.

2 Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Initial models (with gross approximations) show that you can start with B ISM  3  G and end up with B  500  G at the shock, but critical unresolved issues remain: ► Large increases in B can occur, but maximum particle energy does not increase in proportion to B. Maximum proton energy set by weak B in far upstream precursor ► Shape of electron and proton spectra near max. energy critical for modeling X-ray synch and GeV-TeV observations. BUT, shape depends on details of amplification ► How does B-amp influence injection of electrons vs. protons? (no clue!) ► At present, PIC simulations are not “large” enough to model B-amp on scales relevant for SNR shocks ► Theories must have observations for constraints and guidance ► TeV observations particularly important because B-amp increases maximum proton energy

3 Don Ellison, NCSU HESS GLAST TeV Large magnetic fields : Large B  higher energy pion-decay gamma-rays. Observation of turnover essential input for theories. Large B  lower maximum energy for electrons (synch losses) IC emission in GLAST range modified by strong losses in evolving SNR Example with preliminary results for one particular set of input parameters: adapted from Ellison, Patnaude, Slane, Blasi & Gabici et al. 2007 (Note: B-amp. NOT calculated in these models) TeV Example: GeV-TeV Observations (IC/p-p) ratio Inverse-Compton (IC) and pion-decay emission from SNR with large shocked B-fields B sk ~ 20  G B sk ~ 300  G Only difference in models is assumed B-field GeV IC Broad-band observations to PeV energies essential for understanding B-field amplification


Download ppt "Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Magnetic Field Amplification in Astrophysical Shocks 1)There is convincing evidence for."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google