1. Informing the Business Case The Woodburn Interchange ODOT Fall Forum 2015 Presented by: Terry Cole, Region 2 Lead Planner October 8, 2015

2. Party like it’s 1999 30+Year-old Interchange Fast growing City with high development potential Funding difficulties and philosophical differences Dysfunctional relationship Woodburn Interchange, circa 1975 2 Woodburn Interchange, circa 2004

3. 3 19701975198019851990199520002005201020152020 Interchange Redesigned to pre- 2015 Configuration Interchange Rebuilt Interchange EA Initiated Interchange EA Canceled Interchange EA Re-initiated Interchange FONSI approved Interchange Design Started Park and Ride Developed Park and Ride Constructed INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT PARK & RIDE HIGHWAY 214/219 WOODBURN TSP WOODBURN COMP. PLAN FUNDING MILESTONES WOODBURN IAMP SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION 219 Access Rights Acquired to Woodland I-5 to Evergreen Right Turn Lane Constructed NE Quadrant Properties acquired for 1-5 to Evergreen Project Company Stores spend $2M to mitigate existing interchange impact Walmart mitigates impacts to local roads Company Stores Approved First Major TSP Update Adopted First Comprehensive Land Use Plan Adopted First Major Comp Plan Update and UGB expansion Woodburn IAMP Developed Ordinances to Implement IAMP Adopted (Trip Budget, etc.) Walmart Approved First TSP Adopted (calling for interchange refinement plan development) ODOT Funds Reconstruction ODOT Programs Funds to Improve Interchange (based on gas tax increase forecasts) ODOT Cancels Funding after Gas Tax Failure ODOT Funds New EA Woodburn Funds $2.5M Protective ROW Purchase Woodburn Agrees to Provide $8M for Interchange Reconstruction HB 2001 provides $43M for Interchange Reconstruction Ongoing Trip Budget Monitoring Interchange Refinement Plan Developed Woodburn Interchange Significant Planning, Funding, and Development Milestones Winco Approved Interchange rebuilt City-initiated OR 214 Plan Downtown Redevelopment Plan

4. Baby Steps Step back, Cool down Meet with stakeholders Listen Identify areas of mutual interest and concern Provide information, be clear about your objectives Listen 4

5. Break on Through Achieving several basic agreements was necessary before investing in detailed project planning Reconstructing the existing interchange is the best course of action Land Use action should be part of the solution 5 Facility Management is necessary and desirable

6. 6 The IAMP Addressed Public and Private Access Issues Land Use Issues Using ODOT ROW to Construct a Park and Ride

7. 7 The EA Addressed Interchange Design, Road Alignment, and ROW Impacts Environmental Mitigation (including sound walls) Project Limits

8. Old School Business Case Project Recommendation Document Project Summary Project Prospectus 8

9. Purpose and Need Planning Outcomes for Project Design and Construction 9 Dismissed Second Interchange Concept Agreement to Rebuild Existing Interchange Public and Private Access Decisions Median Control Limits Local Circulation Improvements

10. Build a Park and Ride Planning Outcomes for Project Design and Construction 10 Build Sound Walls in Designated Areas Address Drainage and Water Quality Extend East End of Project for Proper Tapers Provide Full Std. Sidewalks and Bike Lanes Design Aesthetic Gateway Features

11. 11 Developed IGA with City to use City funds for a $2.5M ROW protective purchase Negotiated City commitment of $8M for implementation Other Planning Process Outcomes Affecting Project Design and Construction

12. The Final Interchange Design 12 Questions?