Do Multiple Trainers Increase the Speed of Canine Ability to Generalize a Learned Behavior? Kelsey M. Johnson, Jessica L. Pernsteiner, & Daniel D. Holt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Method Participants 184 five-year-old (M age=5.63, SD=0.22) kindergarten students from 30 classrooms in central Illinois Teacher ratings The second edition.
Advertisements

Using Multiple Baseline Designs to Demonstrate the Efficacy of Using Behavior Therapy to Teach Children Vocal Imitation Jeffrey R. Miller, Katie M. Wiskow,
Using Multiple Baseline Designs to Demonstrate the Efficacy of Using Behavior Therapy to Teach Children to Answer Questions Kathryn R. Haugle, Chelsea.
Assessing Preference for Attention in a Child Diagnosed with Autism Jodi Ogle, Cierra Micke, Kelly Paulson, Carrie Haessly, Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Matt.
Efficiency of verbal and mechanical markers for training a difficult or simple behavior in pet dogs K. Snider and J. Joniaux (D. Janik, Advisor) “Clickers”
Gili Rechany M.A. BCBA Shema Kolainu – Hear Our Voices January 6, 2005
Behavioral Applications Regarding Canines Erin E. Barney, Kristine A. Funk, Holly S. Perszyk, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau.
1 New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Setting Performance Standards.
Chapter 5: Improving and Assessing the Quality of Behavioral Measurement Cooper, Heron, and Heward Applied Behavior Analysis, Second Edition.
Teaching Children With Autism To Follow Activity Schedules on an iPad 3 Using Manual Prompts and Edible Reinforcement Mark Mautone 1, Kenneth F. Reeve.
Project Aim To provide training for Early Childhood Care Providers (ECCPs) on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles within the EIBI autism classroom,
Staff Development ED 571: School and Home-Based Programs for Children with Autism.
The Effects of F eedback on the Accuracy of Completing Flight Checklists William Rantz Western Michigan University November 14, 2007.
Assessing and Programming Generalized Behavioral Reduction Across Multiple Stimulus Parameters: A Review Megan Duffy Caldwell College.
Getting Started at Your Own Site and Teaching Others How to Use the ECI.
Chapter 3 Methods for Recording Behavior EDP 7058.
Problem of the Day Problem of the Day next Using a Calculator.
The Effect of Predisposing Factors and Concussion Rate on DIII College Football Players: A Retrospective Study Jon Purvis, Robert Blume, Jenna Chinburg,
 Training: The Visual Tracking Protocol Summarized from Greer & Ross’s Verbal Behavior Analysis (2008)
UNDERSTANDING WHY PROBLEM BEHAVIORS OCCUR Presented by Phillip Tse.
Pilot: Customizing a Commercially Available Digital Game to Assess Cognitive Function William C. M. Grenhart, John F. Sprufera, Jason C. Allaire, & Anne.
College Students' Attitudes Toward and Knowledge of Disabilities: Does Religiosity Matter? Kristi Kluegel and Olivia Tomfohrde, Faculty Advisor: Mary Beth.
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF DATA COLLECTION. RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT Measurement is reliable when it yields the same values across repeated measures.
Introduction Results Increasing Eye Contact in Children with Autism Alia F. Groth, Tina M. Franzke, & Kevin P. Klatt University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
The Effect of Prompting Procedures on the Acquisition, Maintenance and Generalization of Intraverbal Behavior Jennifer L. Jorandby, Stephany K. Reetz,
The Effects of Peer Tutoring Training on Increased Socialization in Free Play Settings with Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders Gili Rechany.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Amanda Verriden, Kathryn Glodowski, Jennifer Jorandby, Chelsea Hedquist, Elizabeth Kooistra, Stephany Reetz, Jeff Miller and Dr. Kevin Klatt (Psychology.
Using Empirical Article Analyses to Assess Students Learning of Psychology Research Methods Sarah Richardson, Michael Schiel, Kaetlyn Graham, & Allen Keniston.
Chapter 6 Application of Withdrawal Design. A-B-A Design The Study: Teaching Socially Valid Social Interaction Responses to Students with Severe Disabilities.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
Investigating the Use of a Blocked Trial Procedure to Facilitate Conditional Discriminations Nicholas K. Reetz, Paula Petit, Sarah Camp, Valerie VanTussi,
Evaluation of Three Leash Training Approaches with Canines Holly S. Perszyk, Jaime R. Barth, Katie M. Wiskow, Jeffrey R. Miller, Tory L. Miller, Brianne.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Prompting Ratio Procedures for Canine Skill Acquisition Jeffrey R. Miller, Nicole C. Scharrer, Holly S. Perszyk, Nicole.
A Review of Naturalistic Teaching Models for Children with Autism Matthew H. Newquist, Kevin Schlichenmeyer, and Kevin Klatt  Psychology Department 
Introduction Smoking and Social Networks Joseph R. Pruis, Student Research Collaborator, Rosemary A. Jadack, PhD, RN, Professor Department Of Nursing,
Introduction Children with autism benefit from early and intensive behavioral treatment (Lovaas, 1987; Smith, 1999). Although behavioral treatment is effective.
Implicit Relational Learning in a Multiple-Object Tracking Task: Do People Really Track the Objects? Tiffany Williams and Olga Lazareva (Department of.
Tourette’s Syndrome is a neurological disorder. A majority of patients seek medical treatment to manage tics (Piacentini & Chang, 2001). Tic symptoms also.
INTRODUCTION Project VIABLERESULTSRESULTS CONTACTS This study represents one of of several investigations initiated under Project VIABLE. Through Project.
Training Interventionists to Implement a Brief Experimental Analysis of Reading Protocol to Elementary Students: An Evaluation of Three Training Packages.
Investigating the Consistency of Results Obtained from a Brief Experimental Analysis of Oral Reading Fluency Christine A. Schounard, Maddie J. Sutton,
Investigating the Step Size in a Progressive-Ratio Schedule of Reinforcement for Young Children Diagnosed with Autism Kathryn R. Glodowski, Chelsea B.
Training Individuals to Implement a Brief Experimental Analysis of Oral Reading Fluency Amber Zank, M.S.E & Michael Axelrod, Ph.D. Human Development Center.
Unit 5: Improving and Assessing the Quality of Behavioral Measurement
Introduction The authors of this research would like to thank the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire’s Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for financial.
Investigating the Step Size in a Progressive-Ratio Schedule of Reinforcement for Young Children Diagnosed with Autism Kathryn R. Haugle, Stephany Reetz,
What Does “Data Training” Look Like?. What the Research Says Jimerson and Wayman (2011) – Little research about best ways to provide effective data-related.
Generalization of the Behavior Sit in Canines to Novel Trainers Nicole C. Scharrer, Jeffrey R. Miller, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shaping Versus Percentile Shaping for Canine Skill Acquisition Jeffrey R. Miller, Jonah P. Streff, Nicole C. Scharrer,
Effect of Conditioned Reinforcer Type on Acquisition of Targeting Behavior in Canis familiaris: Clicking versus Vocalizing Kristine A. Funk, Jessica L.
Kristina K. Vargo, Kelly N. Paulson, Tasha M. Rieck, Nicholas R. Vanselow, and Kevin P. Klatt (Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire)
The Effect of a Trained Attending Response on Rate of Acquisition in Canines Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Jeffrey Miller, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department,
Counting Beans Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State University 901 S. National Avenue Springfield, MO
1 Scoring Provincial Large-Scale Assessments María Elena Oliveri, University of British Columbia Britta Gundersen-Bryden, British Columbia Ministry of.
OSCE Dr. Shama Mashhood. 2 Objectives At the end of the session, participants will be able to: Enumerate the reasons for use of OSCE Explain the process.
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement and Assessment
Investigating the Use of Video Modeling to Teach the Expressive Use of Personal Pronouns to Children with Autism Katie Lichtblau and Kevin P. Klatt Psychology.
Use of a Modified Changeover Delay Procedure to Decrease Scrolled Responses by a Child With Autism Nicholas K. Reetz, Shantel R. Mullins, Sara L. Daugherty,
GTN Research Claire Spence
Jan/Feb 2007CAPA Examiner Train-the-Trainer1 CAPA Training of CAPA Examiners.
Parental, Temperament, & Peer Influences on Disordered Eating Symptoms Kaija M. Muhich, Alyssa Collura, Jessica Hick and Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp Psychology.
Project VIABLE - Direct Behavior Rating: Evaluating Behaviors with Positive and Negative Definitions Rose Jaffery 1, Albee T. Ongusco 3, Amy M. Briesch.
CHELSEA VANDERWOUDE EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF A MIRROR ON IMITATION SKILLS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM.
Animal Integration in the Education Programme Patras, Greece March 2016.
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
Assessment Update September / October Moderation To establish the accuracy of practitioner judgements in line with national exemplification of standards.
Behavioral Applications Regarding Canines
Teresa Mulhern1, Siri Ming1, Laura Moran2, & Dr. Ian Stewart1
The number 1 ranked item is…
Presentation transcript:

Do Multiple Trainers Increase the Speed of Canine Ability to Generalize a Learned Behavior? Kelsey M. Johnson, Jessica L. Pernsteiner, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Discussion Setting & Materials All sessions were conducted at the Eau Claire County Humane Association in a kennel or the staff lounge. Examples of reinforcers used are: hotdogs, verbal praise, physical praise, and toys. Training Each dog was placed in one of three groups and received 8 training sessions.  Group 1- primary trainer trains all 8 sessions  Group 2- primary trainer trains 4 sessions, a generalization trainer trains 4 sessions each.  Group 3- primary trainer trains 2 sessions, 3 generalization trainers train 2 sessions each. Each session consisted of 20 trials. Each dog completed 8 sessions. After the completion of the 8 trials each dog experienced a generalization test. The generalization test used the same procedure by a trainer with no prior interactions with the dog. The test measured the dogs accuracy by determining the percentage of trails they got correct. Thank you to ECCHA Director Lauren Evans, ECCHA Staff, UWEC ORSP, and the B.A.R.C. team. Method IntroductionResults Dogs N= 17 All dogs used were housed at the Eau Claire County Humane Association. All dogs had the ability to sit on command and remain sitting for at least 5 seconds prior to beginning the study. No constraints were placed on age or breed of the dog. Session 1Session 2Session 3Session 4 Date Trail # 1C E C E 11C E 12C E 13C E 14C E 15C E 16C E 17C E 18C E 19C E 20C E % Correct Session 5Session 6Session 7Session 8 Date Trail # 1C E C E 11C E 12C E 13C E 14C E 15C E 16C E 17C E 18C E 19C E 20C E % correct Trail # 1C E C E 11C E 12C E 13C E 14C E 15C E 16C E 17C E 18C E 19C E 20C E % Correct Key: C = Sits and remains sitting for a minimum of 5 sec. E = Does not comply to the command or needs a prompt. Data Sheet Test Sheet Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 It is important for a dog to be able to follow commands from its trainer. For example, the dog should sit only when the “sit” command is presented and should shake only when the “shake” command is presented. Commands, such as sit, are referred to as discriminative stimuli. When the animals behavior is controlled by specific discriminative stimuli (commands) the trainer has obtained what is professionally called stimulus control. When the dog is under stimulus control of the owner, it is also important for the dog to generalize the learned commands to other people. For example, the dog should be able to comply to a sit command from the owner, the owners children, and any other human that comes into contact with the canine. Behavioral Applications Regarding Canines (BARC) has adopted a generalization procedure to increase the canines ability to generalize learned behavior but, there is no published research examining the efficacy of this training procedure. Therefore, we are interested in whether using multiple trainers when conducting generalization training increases the speed of the canines ability to generalize a learned behavior. Group Mean: 84.2% Group Mean: 66.67% Group Mean: 68.33% The graph shows the data for each dog (and the mean) in each of the 3 groups. The data in the table shows the data from each dog across successive training sessions. The data suggest that Group 1 (primary trainer only) may produce the highest degree of generalization. It also appears that training with multiple trainers may actually decrease the dogs ability to generalize a learned behavior. Inter-observer agreement was calculated for 10% of sessions with 100% agreement The mean of each group, displayed on the graph, shows that using trainers other than the primary trainer for generalization skill training actually decreases the canine’s accuracy in performing the correct behavior. Closer inspection of the data presented in the table suggests that the more trainers that are involved, based on average, the less accurate the canine becomes. Any intervention that decreases performance would be problematic. With the current date set, it appears that there may be a tendency for the control group (primary trainer only) to produce the most reliable generalization. Future Research Obtain more dogs in the study to increase confidence in the pattern of results. Increase the number of session the dog participates in before the generalization test to allow for better stimulus control to be obtained by the generalization trainers which may result in more accurate results on the final test. Canine # Group # Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5 Session 6 Session 7 Session 8 Average Correct TestDiffer (+)= improve (-)= worse 3180%70% 60%65%85%75%80%73.1%85%+11.9% 8180%90%85%65%80% 70%85%79.4%70%-9.4% 11190% 85%90%85%100%70%95%88.13%100%+11.87% 12180%90% 100%95%90%85%100%91.25%95%+3.75% 16175%55% 70%90%70%85%30%66.25%70%+3.75 Tot. Ave %84% %65%40%35%45%90%55%40%56.9%55%-1.9% 5295%80%75%50%65% 85%90%75.6%45%-30.6% 9280%75%80%70%55%70%65% 70%85%+15% 10285% 70%60%70%65%45%55%66.9%55%-11.9% 13285%75%95%65%80%95%60%45%75%60%-15% 17290% 95%90%100%95%90%85%91.88%100%+8.12% Tot. Ave. 72.7%66.67%-6.04% 1395% 90%60%75%95%40%55%75.6%35%-40.6% 43100% 85%95% 90%95%100%95%90%-5% 6390%80%95% 85%100%85%100%91.25%95%+3.75% 7385%80%85%65%85%100%55%80%79.4%55%-24.4% 14390%85%50%85% 95%65%95%81.25%75%-6.25% 15375%90%45%60%65%85%55%80%69.38%60%-9.38% Tot. Ave %68.33%-13.65% The table displays percentage correct trials, averages of the eight trials, the canine’s generalization test percentage correct trials, and the difference found between the average and test scores. Generalization test data for each canine and means for each group.