OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 CASE STUDY THE RIGHT OF A SHAREHOLDER TO BE INFORMED AND THE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Main Requirement to IPOing company The IPO'ing company: Must have assets of at least 400,000 Euro Must have revenue of at least 80,000 Euro in the previous.
Advertisements

Your Community Association Partner Community Association Meetings: Owner Meetings & Board Meetings Trish Harris April 5, 2014.
Meetings. Corporate Law: Law principles and practice General provisions for meetings Companies have a number of different meetings. Meetings have a number.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
(1) QUORUM (2) CHAIRMAN PROPERLY CONSTITUTED:. QUORUM LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1.DEFINITION 2. CASUAL MEETING 3. ABSENCE OF QUORUM.
Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting Brussels, 13 April 2011.
Company meetings.
Third ICAC Symposium The New York Stock Exchange – A Regulator and a Listed Company James F. Duffy Executive Vice President & General Counsel NYSE Regulation,
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
3rd Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable Shareholder Rights, Equitable Treatment and the Role of the State April 17-18, 2002 hosted by Securities and.
FORMATION OF COMPANIES & THE COMPANY CONSTITUTION CORPORATE LAW.
COMMISSION FOR PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION 14 TH Meeting, CEEDPA may, Kyiv LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR DATA PROTECTION, COMPETENCES AND PRIORITIES OF THE COMMISSION.
How to Hold Electronic Meetings and Votes Community Associations Institute 2012 Annual Conference Steve Sowell.
BOARD MEETING FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS (U/S 285) -- ONCE IN EVERY 3 MONTHS AND AT LEAST 4 IN A CALENDAR YEAR -- GAP BETWEEN 2 MEETINGS – 6 MONTHS -- CLAUSE.
OECD Third Eurasian Roundtable on Corporate Governance Kyiv, Ukraine April 17-18, 2002 CORPRORATE GOVERNANCE IN UKRAINE: WHY UKRAINE NEEDS A NEW JOINT.
Corporation – bearer shares Compare bearer shares – registered shares –Purposes of each –Cultural preferences Bearer shares –Transformation (vested right?)
The Second Asian Roundtable on Corporate Governance Island Shangri-La Hotel, Hong Kong, China May 31, 2000 Copyright, 2000 © FRS & Associates, Inc. The.
PREPARED FOR: PM ALICIA TAN PREPARED BY: NUR HUSNA RASHID.
PROXY VOTING Presented by Jeffrey S. Kropschot, VP and CCO A.G. Edwards Trust Company FSB FIDUCIARY AND INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 2008 NATIONAL.
The Board of Directors Corporate Governance Chapter 4.
Case COMP/ – ENI (Abuse of Dominant Position) International Competition Law Dushanka Dovichinska 24 Nov 2010.
6th ASIAN ROUNDTABLE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Yong-Jin Jung Seoul North Distric Prosecutor’s Office Korea Theme III, Session 2 Relations between Regulators.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
Stock Corporations II. INCORPORATION 1.Articles of Incorporation (Charter) Written form is required. Furthermore the signatures of both incorporators.
Corporate Governance for the Paralegal MCLE March 4, 2008 Sean P. Mahoney K&L Gates One Lincoln Street Boston, Massachusetts
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT Eva Rooks, MA Health Services Administrator/Trainer Health Systems Quality Assurance Division Washington State Department of Health.
1 Ensuring the protection of bidders’ rights.  The Federal Law of № 94-FZ "On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal.
PUBLIC MEETING LAW Clackamas County Counsel Steven Lounsbury.
Republic of Macedonia MINISTRY OF FINANCE SKOPJE DEPUTY MINISTER OF FINANCE DIMKO KOKAROSKI, Ph.D. The Conference on Accounting Reform and Institutional.
1. Law of Ukraine on “Natural Monopolies”, Order of the President of Ukraine “On National commission providing energy state regulation ”, NERC Order “On.
A case on Chinese Company Law: Faye. Case introduction Company A and Company B established a limited liability company C together. The stock share of.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
FOURTH SUTH EASTERN EUROPE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ROUNDTABLE 6-7 March 2003, Sarajevo LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
State shareholders should become an active force in promoting the establishment of effective corporate governance Chen Qingtai State Council Development.
A case on Chinese Company Law: Faye. Resolutions of shareholder’s meeting.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Presented By: A document prepared by promoters After the formation of company To take capital by issuing shares Data regarding Company’s policy.
General Shareholders Meeting and Romanian Corporate Governance Graciela Iordache Romanian Shareholders Association OECD Conference on S-E Corporate Governance.
Case Study Valen Dec Case for Discussion Corporation (LLC) A BC  A, B and C are on bad terms  no shareholders’ meeting for 2 years  bad management.
Shareholders’ Voting Rights Suzie. Facts  Company A ( 2 million )  B ( Director, Legal Rep ) Company C  ( 0.9 million ) ( 1.1 million )
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Emergency Issues May 6, 2008 TPTF.
REFORMS ON IMPROVING KAZAKHSTAN’S POSITION IN «PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS» INDICATOR IN DOING BUSINESS.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
CHANGE OF THE SYSTEM OF COORDINATION OF STATE FINANCIAL INSPECTION OF UKRAINE ACTIVITY Providing complete independence in the activity of State Financial.
Various International Branches Human Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Rights Freedoms Public Law (Criminal Code) United Nations United Nations.
Chapter 14 Members’ Meetings
PowerPoint presentation
AN OVERVIEW ON THE MANAGEMENT OF MEETINGS
3rd Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable
Chapter 31: Other Organizational Forms for Small Businesses
About the MEDT’s Role in Improving Business Environment
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Issues Needing a Rapid Response
Alexander BIRYUKOV Doctor of Law,
INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC SECRETARIES OF KENYA
Privileged Information: Confidentiality and Disclosure
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
OECD South Eastern Europe Corporate Governance Roundtable
Annual general meeting
شركات المساهمة​ (corporations) Joint stock company
Robert’s Rules of Order
Corporations and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Robert’s Rules of Order
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
CHAPTER 9 THE CORPORATE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Delmar Cengage Learning.
PROCEDURE FOR ANNUAL CORPORATE MEETING
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Presentation transcript:

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 CASE STUDY THE RIGHT OF A SHAREHOLDER TO BE INFORMED AND THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED (an example of two court cases) By Ms. Vladyslava Ryabota International Finance Corporation

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITUATION A Joint Stock Company in Luhans’k oblast A shareholder, dissatisfied with the decisions of a shareholders’ meeting, brought an action to invalidate the meeting and won the case

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 BRIEFLY ABOUT THE MEETING The shareholders’ meeting was conducted in March, 2000 Quorum was – 74,5% Representatives of the Securities Commission were present at the registration There were no violations reported by the Securities Commission representatives

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 DECISIONS OF THE MEETING Supervisory Board elected Changes to the charter adopted (the first since 1996!!!) 11 by-laws adopted

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 GROUNDS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER’S ACTION The shareholder was not personally informed about the meeting A general notification was not published in the national press Improperly issued proxies were registered at the meeting

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 FACTS, ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT There was no proof of personal notification and publication of a notice Proxies were issued by the management board improperly. Some of the violations were technical (a date was written in numbers) and some – substantial (documents were signed in the absence of the shareholders or not by the shareholders at all, etc.)

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 COURT DECISION All proxies (that in total constituted 37% of the votes) were recognized as invalid The shareholders’ meeting was recognized as invalid due to the absence of a quorum (74,5 – 37 = 37,5) All decisions of that meeting were nullified

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 THE CASE ANALYSIS The court decision was correct in principle, but… There were no regulations for the issuance of proxies by the management board, hence, the management board might not have realized that it violated the rights of shareholders The court remained silent on the issue regarding the lack of notification of the shareholder.... A chance decision or a precedent?

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 AT THE SAME TIME SOMEWHERE IN ZHYTOMYR A shareholder, holding a 25% stake, brought an action to invalidate decisions of a shareholders’ meeting The only grounds for the suit was the lack of personal notification and publication in the press The shareholder lost the case

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 THE COURT GAVE THE FOLLOWING REASONS FOR ITS DESICION: Considering that decisions of the meeting did not violate any of the shareholder’s rights (!!!), INDIVIDUAL VIOLATIONS OF TECHNICAL PROCEDURES cannot be a justification to invalidate such decisions

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 WHY IT HAPPENED? In Ukraine, there is no special legislation for the regulation of both issues – issuance of proxies by the management board and the consequences of not providing notice of a meeting, and, hence: in both situations the court decided these cases by analogy, but did not consider the specifics of corporate relations

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 SOLUTION Development of special legislation (in particular, adoption of a new Law “On Joint Stock Companies”) Implementation of National Corporate Governance Principles Education

OECD, Third Eurasian Round Table on Corporate Governance, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 17-18, 2002 For additional information, please contact: International Finance Corporation Ukraine Corporate Development Project 4 Bohomoltsya Street Tel. (380-44)