DAM Collateral Requirements Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market Dec 16, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nodal Credit Limit Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
Advertisements

NPRR 206 DAM Credit Requirements Reduction: E Values and Percentiles Luminant Proposal.
The information in this presentation has been collated by ELEXON and while all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this information, ELEXON.
Concerns with RUC Capacity Short Charge and Energy Trades.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Ancillary Services – Day-Ahead & Real Time Markets Mini Market.
ASX Clear - Risk Framework
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
ADNEOM T ECHNOLOGIES : EXPERTS STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE ADNEOM B ENELUX EXPERTS STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE WWW. ADNEOM. COM ADNEOM B ENELUX.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
Training NPRR 206 and “e” Factors August 10, 2010 NPRR 206 and "e" Factors.
ERCOT Credit Loss Model Mark Ruane Credit Work Group / Market Credit Work Group ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
August 2012 QMWG DAM Clearing Behavior for Fixed Quantity Blocks Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Kim, Gyutai, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Chosun University 1 Futures Contract.
Nodal Settlement Delta Calculations and Statements – 7/11/06 Workshop  Objective: Describe design concepts of nodal settlement delta calculations and.
MCWG Update to WMS 6/15/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
September 2012 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
October 20, 2010 WMS Credit Update. 2 Topics Nodal exposure – how much collateral CRR/TCR auctions – December 2010 Preliminary Credit Cutover Timeline.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 04/06/
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR 567 Multi-Part A/S Bidding PRS January Meeting January 19, 2006.
1 DAM Credit parameters review The “Procedures for Setting Nodal Day Ahead Market (DAM) Credit Requirements Parameters” is a document that is required.
Nodal Credit DAM Non-Business Day Treatment of Available Credit Limit (ACL)
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
January 7, 2011 Review Nodal Exposure / Collateral as of end of December, 2010 Cheryl Yager.
Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
ERCOT Market Credit Working Group Presentation to the Finance and Audit Committee Payment Short Pay/Default and Uplift for Congestion Revenue rights (CRRs)
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 03, :30 PM.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
November 27, 2012 NPRR322, Real-Time PTP Option Modeling Implementation Overview.
DAM Self-Commitment Issues & Solutions, Part 2 Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. (512) April 21, 2008.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
1 Nodal Day Ahead Invoice Taskforce Update COPS, May 8, 2007.
MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010. Agenda Items Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting – Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 16, 2010.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
Recommendation on DACP SE-22 Presentation to the SAC Darren Finkbeiner, Manager – Market Entry and Analysis November 1, 2006.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
WMS – Nodal Credit Integration Start Up May 19,
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Day-Ahead Mini Market Mini Market Walk Through for Day-Ahead.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated and Supplementary Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 20, 2015.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
1 February, 2012 QMWG S&B Protocol Clarifications QSE-Requested Decommitment of a DAM Commitment ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 11, 2016.
MCWG Update to WMS 3/9/2010. Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 1/31/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
DALE MCWG / CWG 3/10/2010.
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

DAM Collateral Requirements Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market Dec 16,

Objectives for credit constraints in Day Ahead Market Objectives for having credit constraints in the Day Ahead Market (DAM) Ensure that a Counter-Party (CP) can pay for its activity in the DAM and any potential related activity in Real Time (RT) –Bids to buy from DAM are covered –RT impact from offers to sell in the DAM are covered Source of information Protocol Section Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers Procedures for Setting Nodal Day Ahead Market (DAM) Credit Requirement Parameters 2

Credit Exposure(CE) for Energy Bid 1.If Bid Price <= 0 then CE= 0 2. If Bid Price > d th Percentile DASPP then CE= quantity*(d th Percentile + e1*(Bid Price- d th Percentile)) 3. If 0 < Bid Price <= d th Percentile DASPP, then CE= quantity* Bid Price dth Percentile DASPP: 85th percentile of the Day-Ahead Settlement Point Price (DASPP) for the hour over the previous 30 days e1 : 95th percentile of Ratio1 over the last 30 days, where Ratio1 is a daily calculation as follows: Ratio1 = Min[1, Max[0, (Σh=1,24 (Qcleared-Bids*PDAM - Qcleared-TPO*PDAM - Qcleared-EOO*PDAM)/ (Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM)]] except Ratio1 = 1 when Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM = 0 3

Energy Bid CE Calculations 4 Scenario e1 = 1e1 = 0.2 dth Percentile DASPP 60 Bid Price5,000 e110.2 Quantity10 CE FormulaQuantity *(DASPP + e1*(Bid Price-DASPP)) CE Value 10*(60 + 1*(200-60)) = 50,000 10*( *(200-60)) = 10,480

Credit Exposure(CE) for Three Part Supply Offer 1.If offer Price <= yth Percentile DASPP then If zth Percentile DASPP >0 then CE= quantity*zth Percentile DASPP (CE reduced) If zth Percentile DASPP <0 then CE= quantity*zth Percentile DASPP ( CE increased) 2. If offer price > yth Percentile DASPP then CE = 0 yth Percentile DASPP: 45th percentile of the Day-Ahead Settlement Point Price (DASPP) for the hour over the previous 30 days zth Percentile DASPP: 50th percentile of the Day-Ahead Settlement Point Price (DASPP) for the hour over the previous 30 days 5

TPO CE Calculations 6 ScenarioOffer Price <= yth Percentile DASPP (TPO transactions that are “likely to be awarded”) Offer Price > yth Percentile DASPP (TPO transactions that are deemed “not likely to be awarded”) yth Percentile DASPP zth Percentile DASPP Offer Price Quantity10 CE FormulaQuantity * zth percentile DASPP CE Value10*60=600 (CE Decreased) 10*-4 = -40 (CE Increased) 0

“e” Factors ParameterApplies to:Calculated:Used to: “e1”DAM Energy Bids Defined ratio (Ratio1) comparing balance between awarded DAM Energy Bids, EOOs and TPOs. Calculated daily by CP. Calculated based on values (quantity * price). A specified percentile from the past 30 days Ratio1 is used Modify DAM Energy Bid exposure and set value between recent historical pricing (when “e1” is near “0” ) and bid price (when “e1” is near “1”) “e2”EOOsDefined ratio (Ratio2) comparing balance between awarded EOOs, TPOs and DAM Energy Bids Calculated daily by CP. Calculated based on quantities only A specified percentile from the past 30 days Ratio2 is used Modify EOO exposures and allow between no offset value (when “e2” is near “0”) and full offset value at the 45th percentile of historical prices (when “e2” is near “1”) for offers likely to be awarded. “e3”EOOsValued at 1Require collateral for 90% of the price difference between DAM and RT for all EOO offers, whether likely to be awarded or not 7

“e” Factors Calculation ParameterNew Counter Party (From entry until the second biweekly reset) Default value for every Counter-PartyEntities who meet the requirements for favorable treatment “e1”1 95th percentile of Ratio1 over the last 30 days where Ratio1 is a daily calculation as follows: Ratio1 = Min[1, Max[0, (Σh=1,24 (Qcleared-Bids*PDAM - Qcleared-TPO*PDAM - Qcleared-EOO*PDAM)/ (Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM)]] except Ratio1 = 1 when Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM = 0 75th percentile of Ratio1 over the last 30 days where Ratio1 is a daily calculation as follows: Ratio1 = Min[1, Max[0, (Σh=1,24 (Qcleared-Bids*PDAM - Qcleared-TPO*PDAM - Qcleared-EOO*PDAM)/ (Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM)]] except Ratio1 = 1 when Σ h=1,24 Qcleared-Bids*PDAM = 0 “e2”00 25th percentile of Ratio2 over the last 30 days where Ratio2 is a daily calculation as follows: Ratio2 = 1 - Max[0, (Σh=1,24 (Qcleared-EOO + Qcleared-TPO - Qcleared-Bids)/ (Σ h=1,24 (Qcleared-EOO + Qcleared-TPO))] except Ratio2 = 0 when Σ h=1,24 (Qcleared-EOO + Qcleared-TPO) = 0 “e3”111 8

Questions 9