Cloudnet meeting 18-19 Oct 2004 - Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan OConnor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced.
Advertisements

Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan, Malcolm Brooks, Anthony Illingworth
Blind tests of radar/lidar retrievals: Assessment of errors in terms of radiative flux profiles Malcolm Brooks Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth David.
Robin Hogan Department of Meteorology University of Reading Cloud and Climate Studies using the Chilbolton Observatory.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
A Methodology for Simultaneous Retrieval of Ice and Liquid Water Cloud Properties O. Sourdeval 1, L. C.-Labonnote 2, A. J. Baran 3, G. Brogniez 2 1 – Institute.
1 An initial CALIPSO cloud climatology ISCCP Anniversary, July 2008, New York Dave Winker NASA LaRC.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
EarthCARE: The next step forward in global measurements of clouds, aerosols, precipitation & radiation Robin Hogan ECMWF & University of Reading With input.
ESA Explorer mission EarthCARE: Earth Clouds, Aerosols and Radiation Explorer Joint ESA/JAXA mission Launch 2016 Budget 700 MEuro.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor Bern, July 5 -7, 2006 Raman Lidar activities at Rome - Tor Vergata F.Congeduti, F.Cardillo,
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Multiple Scattering and CLOUDNET D.Donovan, J. Pelon and M. Haeffelin.
Balloon-Borne Sounding System (BBSS) Used for atmospheric profiling Measures P, T, RH, wind speed and direction Uncertainties arise from incorrect surface.
Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009 LIDAR. What is LIDAR? Stands for LIght Detection And Ranging Micropulse LASERs Measurements of (usually) backscatter from.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Lidar algorithms to retrieve cloud distribution, phase and optical depth Y. Morille, M. Haeffelin, B. Cadet, V. Noel Institut Pierre Simon Laplace SYMPOSIUM.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
MT Workshop October 2005 JUNE 2004 DECEMBER 2004 End of OCTOBER 2005 ? MAY 2002 ? Capabilities of multi-angle polarization cloud measurements from.
Cloud screening and aerosol retrievals from MAX-DOAS measurements at Ukkel Clio Gielen Michel Van Roozendael, Francois Hendrick, Caroline Fayt, Christian.
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
SIRTA Site Instrumental de Recherche par Télédétection Atmosphérique Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Coordinator CLOUDNET Meeting, Paris May 2002.
Operation of Backscatter Lidar at Buenos Aires (34.6 S / 58.5 W) for the Retrieval and Analysis the Atmospheric Parameters in Cirrus Clouds, Tropopause.
Month day, year Comments from NWSHQ Perspective Need to produce table showing 68 baseline & option products vs products that PG is working on What is link.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
LMD LMD Science Team CALIPSO – March M.Chiriaco, H.Chepfer, V.Noel, A.Delaval, M.Haeffelin Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, France P.Yang,
Matthew Shupe, Ola Persson, Amy Solomon CIRES – Univ. of Colorado & NOAA/ESRL David Turner NOAA/NSSL Dynamical and Microphysical Characteristics and Interactions.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Nicolas Gaussiat Damian Wilson, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, UK Dominique Bouniol, Alain.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean cloud biases in ACCESS.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
1 « TReSS » ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING TRANSPORTABLE-MOBILE PLATFORM Pierre H. Flamant, Claude Loth Juan Cuesta, Dimitri Edouard, Florian Lapouge*
1 Atmospheric profiling to better understand fog and low level cloud life cycle ARM/EU workshop on algorithms, May 2013 J. Delanoe (LATMOS), JC.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Drizzle measurements with the HSRL and the KAZR: sensitivity to assumptions Ed Eloranta University of Wisconsin-Madison
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
BBHRP Assessment Part 2: Cirrus Radiative Flux Study Using Radar/Lidar/AERI Derived Cloud Properties David Tobin, Lori Borg, David Turner, Robert Holz,
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Comparing various Lidar/Radar inversion strategies using Raman Lidar data (part II) D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC) D. Whiteman (NASA/GSFC)
Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Toward Continuous Cloud Microphysics and Cloud Radiative Forcing Using Continuous ARM Data: TWP Darwin Analysis Goal: Characterize the physical properties.
Motivation: Help satellite studies of aerosol-cloud interactions Aerosol remote sensing near clouds is challenging Excluding areas near-cloud risks biases.
LIDAR Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009.
Cloudnet Workshop 4-5 Apr Martial Haeffelin
Observations of the Arctic boundary layer clouds during ACSE 2014
Site Instrumental de Recherche par Télédétection Atmosphérique
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Optical particle sizing in vertically inhomogeneous turbid media
Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section
716 Investigating the Role of Aerosols and Clouds on the Radiation Budget in Niamey, Niger Allison Marquardt Collow and Mark Miller Department of Environmental.
M. De Graaf1,2, K. Sarna2, J. Brown3, E. Tenner2, M. Schenkels4, and D
Presentation transcript:

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D. Bouniol, M. Chiriaco, J. Delanoe, P. Drobinski, J-L. Dufresne, C. Flamant, M. Grall, F. Hourdin, F. Lapouge, Y. Lemaître, A. Mathieu, Y. Morille, V. Noel, J. Pelon, C. Pietras, A. Protat, B. Romand, G. Scialom, R. Vautard, Y. Wanherdrick Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Algorithms

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin LIDARCloud and aerosol vertical structure Multi-test algorithm applied on 532-nm channel to identify cloud layers, aerosol layers, molecular layers, and boundary layer height (Morille et al., 2004) Optical depthMulti-retrieval algorithm applied on 532-nm channel to retrieve optical depth of cloud or aerosol layers (Cadet et al., 2004) Depolarization and color ratio Multi-wavelength algorithms using linear and cross-polarized 532-nm and linear 1064-nm channels to discriminate particle shape (Noel et al., 2002) RADARCloud structure Ice/water content Particle size distribution Mean particle diameter from radar reflectivity and doppler velocity Size distribution related to mean diameter Extinction and ice water content function of reflectivity and size distribution Retrieval uncertainties estimated 50% CEILOME TER Cloud-base height Vaisala proprietary algorithm RADIATI- VE FLUX STATION Fraction of cloud cover Shortwave and longwave clear- sky fluxes Clear-sky models derived from measurements. Threshold to identify cloud cover fraction. (Long and Ackerman 2000) MWRIntegrated water vapor and liquid water content Brightness temperatures simulated from radiosonde profiles to calibrate MWR. Water vapor and liquid water contents inverted using the Kummerow and Weinman (1988) algorithm. Data Products

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Lidar Data Products Wavelet transform method: Search for high correlation between a wavelet and the lidar signal Mexican hat for particle layers in the free troposphere Step function for boundary layer Cloud / aerosol separation based on PR2 peak-to-base ratio Distinction between true noise (no more photons) and apparent noise (no more scatterers) Cloud and aerosol vertical structure

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Lidar Data Products L0: Lidar back-scattered power L1: Quality flag Monitoring noise L2: Atmospheric Mask (Clouds, aerosols, Boundary layer, Particle-free zone, Noise Cloud thermodynamic phase Cloud and aerosol layer optical depth L3: Time and layer -average data

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Radar-Lidar Cloud Products Combine Reading classification with LNA classification

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Processed LNA Lidar data: 10/ /2004 Cloud, aerosol mask Time averaged data

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Frequency of occurrence of cloud fraction and vertical distribution of cloud layers Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Frequency of occurrence of single and multiple cloud layers Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Frequency of occurrence of cloud thickness and vertical distribution Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar Relative occurrence of cloud altitude (monthly variations)

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar Relative occurrence of cloud altitude (seasonal variations) Vertical Extent of Clouds

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Cloud Product Dataset Analysis Relative occurrence of cloud-base altitude (seasonal variations) Palaiseau 10/ /2004 LNA Lidar Occurrence of Cloud Base

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Lidar Data Products Mixed phase Liquid water Ice water Normalization problem Cloud thermodynamic phase Based on lidar depolarization ratio +  threshold Requires normalization in particle-free zone (2.74%)

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Lidar Data Products Molecular Integration method:  = ∫  (z)dz Integrated extinction = power loss between theoretical molecular return below the cloud and molecular return above the cloud Cloud optical depth Particle Integration method:  = LR eff ∫ (R(z)-1)  m (z)dz where R(z)=(  m (z)+  c (z))/  m (z) LR eff prescribed: 18 sr LR eff opt derived from MI method Cadet et al. 2004

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Lidar Data Products Cloud optical depth Cadet et al. 2004

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Radiative Flux Station LWSW Operations: 18 months of Global SW + LW SW Direct + Diffuse missing 12/03-02/04

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Radiative Flux Dataset Analysis SW Direct May 2004 SW Diffuse SW Global LW Down

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Radiative Flux Dataset Analysis Shortwave radiative impact of cloud layers Clear-sky reference from F = a cos(  ) b May 2004 Single-layer high-altitude clouds

Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin Produce 2-year radar-lidar L3 products Pursue analysis of vertical structure Pursue developments of lidar-only retrievals and combination Develop clear-sky flux and radiative forcing products, and analyse in relation to the cloud data base Perspectives Institutes and programs supporting SIRTA: