June 18, 2010 Spin Physics Physics From Spin Observables Narbe Kalantarians University of Virginia Potential Spin Physics From a Transversely Polarized.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extraction of G E n at Q 2 =1 (GeV/c) 2 by Measurements of May 1, 2011 Ge Jin University of Virginia.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
COSM-HBCU Network Mahbub Khandaker Norfolk State University Mahbub Khandaker Norfolk State University Norfolk State University Example.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
Measurement of neutron spin asymmetry A 1 n in the valence quark region using the Solenoid Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
SANE S pin A symmetries of the N ucleon E xperiment SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF JOHN GERMAN MASTERS STUDENT FROM NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY. JUNE.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Experimental requirements for GPD measurements at JLab energies. Detector that ensures exclusivity of process, measurement of complete final state Measure.
Roberto Francisco Pérez Benito On behalf the HERMES Collaboration European Graduate School Lecture Week on Hadron Physics Jyväskylä, Aug 25-29, 2008 HERMES.
Why Studying n-DVCS ? Eric Voutier n-DVCS gives access to the least known and constrained GPD, E 0 because F 1 (t) is small 0 because of cancelation of.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
Big Electron Telescope Array (BETA) Experimental Setup Expected Results Potential Physics from SANE Electron scattering provides a powerful tool for studying.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors  Calibrations.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C User Meeting (January 25, 2013) Analysis Updates Proton Form Factor Ratio,
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
A High Precision Measurement of the Deuteron Spin-Structure Function Ratio g 1 /F 1  Motivation  Proposed Experiment  Expeced Results Co:spokespersons:
SANE Spin Asymmetries on the Nucleon Experiment (TJNAF E / P07-003) SANE Collaboration U. Basel, Florida International U., Hampton U., Norfolk S.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
How to reconcile G n M Hampton University and Jefferson Lab Virginia, USA Hall C User Meeting 2008, Jefferson Lab, August 4-5, 2008 Michael Kohl.
Analysis of the Ammonia Target Polarization Kangkang L. Kovacs, Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Spin physics at the SMC Spin Muon Collaboration A. Magnon (CEA-Saclay/IRFU & COMPASS)
Update on Experiments using SoLID Spectrometer Yi Qiang for SoLID Collaboration Hall A Collaboration Meeting Dec 16, 2011.
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
Dihadron production at JLab Sergio Anefalos Pereira (INFN - Frascati)
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage APS April Meeting, February 15, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
Overview of Jefferson Lab’s Spin Physics Programme Stephen Bültmann - ODU RHIC/AGS Users Meeting, June 2007 Introduction Experimental Setup Asymmetry Measurement.
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Advisor : Dr. Michael Kohl  Introduction  Physics Motivation  Detector Setup &
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Spin Structure of the neutron (3He) in the resonance region Patricia Solvignon Temple University, Philadelphia For the JLAB Hall A and E Collaborations.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Spin dependence in exclusive ρ o production at COMPASS Andrzej Sandacz Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw On behalf of the Collaboration  ρ.
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
The Spin Physics Program at Jefferson Lab Sebastian Kuhn Old Dominion University e e PtPt PePe.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Proton Form Factor Ratio G E /G M from Double Spin Asymmetry with Polarized Beam and Target Anusha.
Double spin asymmetry measurement from SANE-HMS data at Jefferson Lab Hoyoung Kang For SANE collaboration Seoul National University DIS /04/23.
Vahe Mamyan, Hall-C collaboration meeting, January Data Analysis of F2 and R in Deuterium and Nuclei  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors.
1 CLAS-eg1 pol.-proton analysis H.Avakian (JLab) semi-SANE Collaboration Meeting April 21, 2005.
Single Target Spin Asymmetries and GPDs Jian-ping Chen, Jefferson Lab, Virginia, USA SSA Workshop, BNL, June 1-3, 2005 Nucleon structure and GPDs DVCS.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
CLAS Collaboration at Jefferson Lab Deuteron Spin Structure function g 1 at low Q 2 from EG4 Experiment Krishna P. Adhikari, Sebastian E. Kuhn Old Dominion.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Advisor : Dr. Michael Kohl  Introduction  Physics Motivation  Detector Setup &
Jefferson Lab PAC 30 1 August 23, 2006 PR (Hall A) ● PR (Hall C) Measuring the Neutron g 2 and d 2 at 12 GeV PR (Hall A) ● PR
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Proton Form Factor Ratio GE/GM from Double Spin Asymmetry with
P. Solvignon, Duality Workshop
Probing the Spin Structure of the Nucleon: New Experimental Results on d2 and A1 for Neutron and Proton from JLab Brad Sawatzky APS April.
University of New Hampshire Nuclear & Particle Physics Group
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Spin Duality on the Neutron (3He)
GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

June 18, 2010 Spin Physics Physics From Spin Observables Narbe Kalantarians University of Virginia Potential Spin Physics From a Transversely Polarized Solid Target at 12GeV Workshop on Polarized Target Experiments for 12GeV

Spin Physics Goals Measure spin structure function g 2 (x,Q 2 ) and spin asymmetries A 1,2 (x,Q 2 ) for proton with as broad an x coverage as possible, at constant Q 2. Learn all we can about proton SSFs from a double polarization inclusive measurement - Twist 3 effects from moments of g 1 & g 2 : Matrix element - Comparisons with Lattice QCD, QCD sum rules, bag models, chiral quarks. - Study x dependence (test nucleon models) and Q 2 dependence (evolution). - Method: - Measure inclusive asymmetries for 2 polarized target configurations relative to polarized beam: parallel and near-perpendicular - Detect electrons with novel large solid angle detector(s) like BETA/(Super)BigBite.

Polarized DIS Longitudinal Target Polarization  n = 0 Transverse Target Polarization  n =  Beam helicity

Obtaining Quantities Of Interest Measured double-spin asymmetries f dilution factor P B Average Beam Polarization P T Average Target Polarization Calculate physics asymmetries using measured ones Obtain SSFs from A 1 & A 2 and unpolarized structure-function F 1 (x)

Spin-Structure Functions g 1 (x,Q 2 ) is defined with a dependence on quark helicity q +/- (x,Q 2 ) g 2 (x,Q 2 ) is more complex. Contains part dependent on g 1 (g 2 WW ) and another on higher order terms - h T chiral-odd transversity term (twist-2),  involves quark-gluon correlations (twist-3). - m (current) quark mass.

Spin-Structure Sum Rules - Burkhardt-Cottingham (not from OPE) d N measure twist-3 contributions (m << M, h T not very large) OPE: moments of g 1 & g 2 related to twist-2 (a N ) and twist-3 (d N ) matrix elements - Efremov-Leader-Teryaev (Combined with neutron data from JLab Halls A,C)* *PR

Physics Asymmetries: A p 1 Constrain extrapolations of A p 1 x->1. A par & A perp needed to get model-free A 1 & A 2. measurement of A 2 will contribute to improving world’s A 1 data. pQCD SU(6)

Spin Structure Functions: g 1, g 2 x dependence at constant Q 2. Focusing on region most sensitive to x 2 g 1 & x 2 g 2

Matrix Element: d p 2 Expected errors for d 2 from SANE (  d 2 ): -  d 2 (Q 2 = 3GeV 2 ) = 7x10 -4 for 0.3 < x <  d 2 (3.5 < Q 2 < 6.5GeV 2 ) = 2x10 -4 for 0.4 < x < 1.0

Kinematic Coverage Complementary to SANE 2(3) Beam Energies (0.1uA): (4.4GeV), 6.6GeV, 8.8GeV. Extensive x coverage at constant Q 2 with detector set at scattering angles at 20,40 0. SANE W=2

Kinematic Coverage 2(3) Beam Energies (0.1uA): (4.4GeV), 6.6GeV, 8.8GeV. Extensive x coverage at constant Q 2 with detector set at scattering angle at 20,40 0. E’ >1.3GeV, W>1.075GeV. In the process of looking at asymmetries.

Dramatic discrepancy between Rosenbluth and recoil polarization technique. Multi-photon exchange considered the best candidate for the explanation Spin Observables provide an independent measurement. Using Spin Observables: Form-Factor Ratio Bigger part lifts up small part (spin observables).

Measuring the Form-Factor Ratio The elastic asymmetry, The beam-target asymmetry, Here, A P = + Nc A m f P B P T A p = - br SinΘ*Cos  * - aCosΘ* r 2 + c r = G E P /G M P a, b, c = kinematic factors Θ*,  * = pol. and azi. Angles between q and S A m = Measured Asymmetry P B,P T = Beam & Target Pol. f = Dilution Factor Nc = A Correction Term From these kinematics, r2 << c P T + = ~70.0%, P B = ~80.0%,

Estimated Rates and Errors E beam Q 2 mom E’  e  p Q 2 I(uA)  (cm^2/sr)  p  e Rate(/hr) time(days) Counts E E E Q 2 asym Asym err  Ge/Gm  Ge/GM err

Estimated Rates and Errors Q 2 asym Asym err  Ge/Gm  Ge/GM err

UVa Target Superconducting magnet from Oxford Instruments. Produces 5T field at 79A. Polarizes via Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) with frequency 28GHz/T at 5T => 140GHz. Polarization measured by NMR. Proton Larmor frequency 42.6MHz/T in 5T field => 213MHz Frozen solid NH(D) 3 target. Luminosity ~10 35 cm -1 s -1. Recently repaired at Oxford!

Work To Do: Determine best detector(s) to use, and at which setting(s). Get expected results for SSFs and higher twist quantities. Determine amount of beam-time needed. …

Summary From a 0th order look, using UVa target considering:  Spin Physics Can measure double polarization inclusive scattering to obtain g 1, A 1, 2 and d 2 at broad kinematic coverage. Would take data with beam energies of (4.4) 6.6 & 8.8 GeV with polarized beam and target in parallel and near-perpendicular fields. Increase coverage by using large acceptance detector(s) e.g. BETA or (Super)BigBite.  Using Spin Observables Measure ratio of nucleon form-factors  G M /G E. Higher Q 2 coverage, providing independent measurement. Use large acceptance detector(s), similar to spin-structure case. H. Baghdasaryan, M. Jones, O. Rondon, D. Day

Support Slides

Additional Motivation Complementary to RSS (E ). Measure A 1 & A 2 at higher Q 2 & W. Reduce error in extrapolations and moments of A meas.

BigCal Tracker Cerenkov Lucite Hodoscope Big Electron Telescope Array – BETA 3 planes of Bicron Scintillator provide early particle tracking. N 2 Cerenkov gas Provides particle ID 8 mirrors and 8 PMTs 28 bars of 6cm wide Lucite Bars oriented horizontally for Y tracking PMTs on either side of bar provides X resolution Lead glass calorimeter 1744 blocks aprox. 4cm x 4cm (Protvino), 3.8cm x 3.8cm (RCS) energy and position measurement Forward Tracker (Norfolk State) Cerenkov (Temple) Lucite Hodoscope (NCA&T) BigCal (IHEP,Protvino,W&M,Lanzhou)

Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Refrigerator K Magnetic Field 2-6T Microwaves GHz NMR Polarization Protons: % Deuterons: 20-50% Employs paramagnetic radicals, which provide electron-proton hyperfine splitting in a high magnetic field at moderate-low temperature Microwaves drive “forbidden transitions” to propagate polarization.

A Q-meter is connected in series to the NMR coil with inductance L C and resistance r C, which is imbedded in the target sampling. The impedance Z C of this circuit is written where  is the filling factor of the coil. Measurement of Polarization

The desired transitions and are forbidden. Using the fact that the dipole-dipole interaction exists: 2 distant magnetic moments => dipole-dipole interaction << Zeeman splitting This results in a mixing of nuclear states, allowing for the desired interactions, though with a much less probability than those allowed (10 -4 ). Forbidden Transitions H I Z S Z -1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 -1/2 1/2 -1/2  PR  R  PR forbidden E

Q-meter Piece of equipment used in testing of rf circuits. Measures Q “Quality-factor” of a circuit, or how much how much energy is dissipated per cycle in a non-ideal reactive circuit. For inductors

Target Performance J. Maxwell ~71%

Degree of Polarization P. Dilution factor f, ratio of free polarizable nucleons to the total amount of nucleons in the sample and is dependant on kinematics. Here P and f correct for the fact that the target is not 100% polarized and contains other materials. The (raw) asymmetry is then expressed as The amount of beam-time needed t to obtain a statistical error  A has the dependency Where  is the density of the material. Important Criteria

Monte Carlo Use for training ANN. Obtain understanding of reconstruction. Provide understanding of efficiencies for df. Using F1F209 model from P. Bosted, E. Christy, and V. Mamyan. recgen E’ 80  180   recgen 