WLTP ANNEX 4, ROAD LOAD CALCULATION Proposal for calculating the road load of individual vehicles C. Lueginger, BMW; A. Feucht, Audi 14.03.2013 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-202.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current status of alternative warming up procedure Annex 4 § (OIL#19) WLTP-06-25e T. Yamaguchi, Japan
Advertisements

WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
flat belt + wind tunnel method
WLTP drive trace normalization
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 Serge Dubuc, WLTP GTR 15 Drafting Coordinator WLTP-09-26e.
Proposal tire & vehicle selection for WLTP DTP10 06-Jun-2012 JAPAN.
WLTP rev1e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
WLTP normalization rotational Mass
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
FLATBELT/DYNO + WINDTUNNEL METHOD RLD WITH FLATBELT/DYNO AND WIND TUNNEL, OIT #10 AND #18 WLTP-08-22e.
Default Road Load issue Initial Dutch proposal for a Update Progress report Annex 4 Open Issues: WLTP-07-07e 5. Default road load parameters (OIL.
WLTP-08-19e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP Road Load Family concept
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP DRAFTING TF, "RECORDED" BMW, Christoph Lueginger DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MEASURED AND RECORDED.
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
WLTP wind tunnel concept
WLTP, RESULT CALCULATION, V4 MEASURED RESULT IS CORRECTED BY RCB, KI, 14° TEST AND INTERPOLATION. BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP-12-08e.
WLTP 8th DTP Meeting Geneva, DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Progress Report DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines (LabProcICE)
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
André Rijnders RDW (NL) and Ernst Peter Weidmann ACEA-LCV
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
WLTP, result calculation, v6
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
Representative road load test procedure Peter Smeds – Swedish Transport Administration Iddo Riemersma – Transport & Environment WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-029,
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
Analysis of Normalization Report With Focus On Rotational Masses Geneva, 14 th of January 2015 Christoph Lueginger BMW WLTP-09-25e.
GTR proposal for Roadload determination JAPAN June 2015 WLTP-11-13e.
WLTP ANNEX 4 AND 7, DELTA CD*A BMW, Christoph Lueginger, Thomas Schütz ALTERNATIVE DETERMINATION METHODS WLTP-10-21e.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
OICA CO 2 Impact through Weight Variation on Light duty Vehicles WLTP DTP6, Geneva OICA, Volkswagen WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-076.
Vehicle selection / Family concept - Japan - ICE lab proc mtg 2012/Sep/4-6 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-142.
Starting notes for Annex 4 Phase2a Issues
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
CO2 and pollutant emissions LDV
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Improvement of Family definitions
NEW ISSUES TASK FORCE PROGRESS REPORT 20th IWG meeting WLTP-20-15e
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Evaluation on Maximum CO2-Delta in 2-Tests-Approach
Draft WLTP Phase 2 – carryover from 1b – Annex 4 Starting note on split runs in coast down testing WLTP-14-18e Within phase 1b, practically all tolerances.
Idea of family CO2/FC family criteria
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
Proposal tire & vehicle selection for WLTP
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Correlation Improvements
GTR 15 clarification on 3g family extension rule renault
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
WLTP Correlation measurement
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
Table of running resistances – PSA proposal
Proposal for aerodynamic options
Comments Ref:WLTP (17/09/13)
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 6/10/2019.
Proposal for aerodynamic options
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
Status Report of New Issues TF –CFD* sub wg
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-183rev1
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/13/2019.
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Combined approach for vehicle test weight, stepless inertia and vehicle selection Revised proposal by The Netherlands (Andre Rijnders ), T&E (Iddo Riemersma)
Presentation transcript:

WLTP ANNEX 4, ROAD LOAD CALCULATION Proposal for calculating the road load of individual vehicles C. Lueginger, BMW; A. Feucht, Audi WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-202 (partly presented at DTP-13) Note: Proposal not yet finalized. It is an intermediate proposal which reflects the current state of discussions in the Drafting Task Force and outlines the general concept.

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Introduction, Motivation WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, Motivation: In order to get a representative and repeatable CO 2 -value for an individual vehicle, many measurements are necessary. Measurements are expensive and object to measurement inaccuracies Proposal: Measure only worst- and best-case. Calculate the individual car. Details are shown here. Introduction: It is possible to calculate the influence of aerodynamics, rolling resistance and mass. This calculation is at least as accurate as a measurement (equipment, tolerances).

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Step 1, Measurement WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, best case: lowest weight best aerodynamics best tyre (lowest rolling resistance) Result: driving resistance coefficients F0F1F2 bc CO 2 -values (low, mid, high, e-high) worst case: highest weight worst aerodynamics worst tyre (highes rolling resistance) Result: driving resistance coefficients F0F1F2 wc CO 2 -values (low, mid, high, e-high) „Measure best- and worst case and determine influence of optional equipment.“ This is an example with bigger values for illustration!

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Step 2, Mathematical fitting of difference WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, Remove linear coefficient by least square fit since physical influence of difference (tyre, mass and aero) only affects F0 and F2 ΔF0F1F2  ΔF0* ΔF2* Remove linear coefficient by least square fit since physical influence of difference (tyre, mass and aero) only affects F0 and F2 ΔF0F1F2  ΔF0* ΔF2* „Divide Road load into single influences.“ ΔF0F1F2 = (F0 wc - F0 bc ) + (F1 wc – F1 bc ) * v + (F2 wc – F2 bc ) * v 2 rolling resistance / weight aerodynamics inertia Total Resistance F [N] : F0 + F1 *v + F2 * v 2 + m * a with F0 = RR * m * g + F0 rest and F2=  air  / 2 * cd * A Driving ResistanceAcceleration Resistance ΔFacc = (mass wc – mass bc ) * a wcbcdifferenceapprox. F0 [N] F1 [N/(km/h)] X F2 [N/(km/h)^2] weight worst case1703 kg best case1553 kg ΔmΔm150 kg

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Step 2, Preparation and Scaling, Part 2 WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, „Calculate CO 2 -scaling factor for each parameter.“ Input:aeroweight and RRinertia Range:0.066 m² c w *A150 kg and 3.5 kg/t150 kg Scaling factorSaSrSi CO 2 -Range: (divide by cycle energy) 117 g/km normalization F2= g/km normalization F0=61.5 Input:aeroweight and RRinertia physical difference of optional equipment Y g CO2/km per Δc w *A X g CO2/km per Δµ RR *mass / per Δmass*µ RR Z g CO2/km per kg Scaling: Calculate cycle energy to compensate for vehicle resistance: E = (driving resistance + acceleration resistance ) * distance This can be done for the whole cycle or the 4 parts separately E bc E wc  E a  E weight, RR  E inertia

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Step 3, Calculating the individual value of a vehicle WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, This calculation provides more representative CO 2 -values (including RR) and reduces the number of measurements at the same time. Calculation can be more precise than measurements. If the CO 2 -range gets too large, measuring of intermediate points could be a solution and/or the 4 parts (low, mid, high, extra-high) can be interpolated separately. Worst-case approach: Calculation will also work, if influences are set to worst-case. E.g. leaving out aerodynamics or taking the worst RR. Optionweight and RRaerodynamicsdifferenceapprox. kg / RRm² (c w *A)kg 61.5 design package+ 5 kg X 18“ tyres+ 10 kg / kg/t glass roof+ 15 kg-+ 15 massage seats+ 60 kg- Sum:+90 kg / +1.8 kg/t + 0, kg ΔCO g/km g/km+ 2.1 g/km CO2-Label: 100 g/km g/km  g/km This is an example with bigger values for illustration!

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Proposal WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, The road load coefficients f0, f1 and f2 for an individual vehicle within in a vehicle family is determined through interpolation of: measured data of selected vehicle using tyres out of highest rolling resistance class and equipped with selectable options with highest aerodynamic drag (measured at TMH) and measured data of selected vehicle using tyres out of lowest rolling resistance class and equipped with selectable options with lowest aerodynamic drag (measured at TML). F0F1F2 ind = F0F1F2 bc +  F0 ind +  F2 ind with  F0 ind = interpolation of F0 max – F0 min (based on RR difference and individual vehicle test mass)  F2 ind = interpolation of F2 max – F2 min (based on manufacturer data of aerodynamic drag of selected options) If the road load of a vehicle is tested only at TMH, the rolling resistance has to be derived from data at TMH. If the manufacturer does not provide aerodynamic data of selected options, F2 from the vehicle with highest aerodynamic drag shall be used.

WLTP Annex 4, Road load Calculation Justification und Summary WLTP Annex 4, Road load calculation, BMW / Audi, With individual road load, the CO 2 -value of an individual vehicle can be checked (e.g. COP). Less test burden due to fewer measurements. Calculation is at least as accurate as measuring. Worst-case approach is always possible. Calculation is done by traceable formulas, only basic physics are used. CO 2 -effect of each option can be communicated to the customer Validation necessary?