Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Important Thing About By. The Important Thing About ******** The important thing about ***** is *****. It is true s/he can *****, *****, and *****.
Advertisements

Solving Systems Using Substitution or Elimination Circuit #1 Solve each system using substitution or elimination.
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Affirmative’s Worst Nightmare.
Debating Case and Disadvantages CODI 2014 Lecture 1.
Constructing a Case for the Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Building Government Cases. Preliminary Steps Follow critical decision making. –Analyze the proposition. Look at all alternatives with as much knowledge.
Page A concept is a category of objects, events or ideas that share similar characteristics; this allows for generalization and distinction.
Is Psychology a Science?
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Chapter 6 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects 6.1.
Constructing a Case for a Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Studying Behavior. Midterm Review Session The TAs will conduct the review session on Wednesday, October 15 th. If you have questions, your TA and.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Kris Stroup, Longview Community College Constructing Opposition Arguments 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Chapter Three Research Design.
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
Chapter Three Chapter Three.
I can remember basic ideas about a topic. Questions I can Answer -Who? -What? -When? -Where? -Why? -How? -What happened? -Which is True or False? Questions.
Economic Reasoning Test Review. What is any reward or benefit that motivates people to do something.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs.
Elimination Day 2. When the two equations don’t have an opposite, what do you have to do? 1.
Experimental Research
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
SOLVING SYSTEMS ALGEBRAICALLY SECTION 3-2. SOLVING BY SUBSTITUTION 1) 3x + 4y = 12 STEP 1 : SOLVE ONE EQUATION FOR ONE OF THE VARIABLES 2) 2x + y = 10.
1 Problem/Solution Proposals English 2010 Intermediate Writing.
Hypotheses 9/4/2012. Readings Chapter 1 The Measurement of Concepts (14- 23) (Pollock) Chapter 2 Measuring and Describing Variables (Pollock) (pp.28-31)
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
PHILOSOPHY Notes. SOME DEFINITIONS:  Necessary: When A is a necessary condition for B, that means that condition A must be fulfilled before condition.
Objectives: Use the elimination method to solve a system of equations. Choose an appropriate method to solve a system of equations. Standards Addressed:
Decision-Making. Decision Making ▪Decision Making - is choosing among two or more alternatives (choices) ▪Begins with identification of a problem and.
Section 4.1 Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
RESEARCH METHODS Reminder: Topics Due Wednesday. THEORY Explanations –Connect & organize data –Framework for future research –Coherent story.
3-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Three Research Design.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
1. Write a proof of the alternate exterior angles theorem.
ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS. Primarily used to show how a number of components are fitted together to make a complete product unit. The term sub-assembly is commonly.
 Problem solving involves a number of well- defined steps, which are as follows:  Define the problem.  Analyze the problem.  Identify and evaluate.
Managing Decision Making and Problem Solving
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
6/22/2016 The Philosophy of Personal Assistance or What its all About Anne Pridmore.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
WARM-UP. SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS: ELIMINATION 1)Rewrite each equation in standard form, eliminating fraction coefficients. 2)If necessary, multiply one.
Constructing Opposition Arguments International Debate Education Association Prepared for IDEA Youth Forum Summer, 2010 Prepared by Robert Trapp Willamette.
LAW 421 Week 1 DQ 3 To purchase this material link 421/LAW-421-Week-1-DQ-3 For more courses visit our website
BIS 219 Week 5 DQ 2 Define Web 2.0. How would you describe Web 2.0 to someone who has not taken a course in information systems? What are the advantages.
Philosophy 242 MEDICAL ETHICS
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Chapter 4: Studying Behavior
Basic Economic Questions
Managing Decision Making and Problem Solving
Product Name.
Solve: 1. 4<
REVIEW: Solving Linear Systems by Elimination
Solve Systems of Equations by Elimination
H.O.T. Questions High Order Thinking Questions
From 3 Geography.
The Decision-Making Model
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Product Name.

Organising the <Insert_the_Name_of_your_NF>
Relationship Relation: Association: real and spurious Statistical:
Managing Decision Making and Problem Solving
Solving Systems of Equations by Elimination Part 2
Negative Attacks.
Presentation transcript:

Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association

Alternative approaches The following are alternatives from which to choose. You will rarely use all of these alternatives. Alternatives –No need to change –Government plan will not work –Disadvantages of the plan –Philosophy of the plan is wrong –Alternative plan of action

No need for change Show that the present system is solving the problem with incremental steps. Show that the effects described by the Government are not occuring.

Plan will not work Show that the plan does not eliminate a necessary cause of the problem. The relationship between the present system and the effect is coincidental, not causal. Show that the plan is not sufficient to solve the problem or produce the advantage.

Disadvantages of the plan Describe some feature of the Government plan. Relate that feature to some effect Show how that effect (disadvantage) is worse than the problem the Government claims to solve.

Counterplan Present an alternative course of action. Show why your proposed course of action is a true alternative – Why should your alternative preclude the Government’s plan of action? Does the counterplan solve the problem outlined by the Government? Does the counterplan avoid some of the disadvantages of the Government’s plan?