1 EPA RIDE Review Expanded Steering Committee Meeting December 11-12, 2006 Betsy Smidinger USEPA/OECA R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Compliance Monitoring Strategy CMS Michael Pjetraj RCO.

Advertisements

Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program

Fox Valley OperatorsAssociationCMOM Capacity Management Capacity ManagementOperationMaintenance January 2011 C apacity M anagement O peration & M aintenance.

Environmental Streamlining Task Force Water Quality Ordinance April 5, 2012.

ADEQ Regulatory Process

Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.

Pesticide Container-Containment Regulations: FIFRA 19(f)(2) Determinations of Adequacy.

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia,

Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit Overview of Requirements, Recommended Changes, and Assistance Needed March 12, 2009.

1 Module 1 Overview of the APDES Permitting Program Seattle, Washington April 24-25, 2012.

Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.

What is it and what can it do for me?

National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.

Staying on Top of Permits & Public Comments Public Comments Policy Track: Sunday, February 28, :30 pm.

NPDES Electronic Reporting: Notices of Intent and Discharge Monitoring Reports Moderator: Andy Battin, U.S. EPA Presented by: John Dombrowski, U.S. EPA.

Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.

Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.

PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)

MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.

Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,

Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.

The Use of Environmental Management Systems in Permitting Decisions National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 May 10, 2006 Christine Steagall SC Department.

Storm Water: Federal Enforcement and Compliance for Phase II MS4.

Electronic Reporting: Notices of Intent and Discharge Monitoring Reports Moderator: Andy Battin, U.S. EPA Presented by: John Dombrowski, U.S. EPA Alison.

WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.

EMS in Agriculture and Agribusiness - United Egg Producers XL Project.

EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.

NYSDEC Efforts to Promote Environmental Excellence John M. Vana New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Pollution Prevention Unit Presented.

Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.

CFO and CAFO Regulatory Issues IN Pork Producers January 30, 2007.

Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.

Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.

THE HOW’S AND WHY’S BEHIND THE WPLCS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Turning WPLCS into PARIS.

1 US EPA Straw Proposals for Modifying the 12/2005 draft Policy Statement Jim Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management, OW Expanded Steering Committee.

1 Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Bill Rensmith, Windsor Solutions, Inc. Mike Beaulac, Michigan DNRE Tony Jeng, enfoTech & Consulting Integrated.

1 The Resource Workgroup’s RIDE Data Entry Estimate Model Expanded Steering Committee Meeting December 11-12, 2006 Betsy Smidinger US EPA/OECA.

1 What Program Requirements Drive Data Needs James Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management Office of Water US EPA Expanded Steering Committee.

1 Overview of EPA Straw Proposals to Reduce State Burden and EPA’s Reactions to States’ Alternative Approaches David Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting.

Compliance Monitoring and the Integrated Compliance Information System Getting the most out of ICIS 2/2007 NPDES Inspector Workshop.

1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.

Meeting Data Needs of CWA NPDES Program Through a Modernized PCS Michael Stahl, Director Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.

1 Quick Update for NOB On ICIS-NPDES and Possible NOB Role NOB Conference Call September 13, 2006 David Hindin Office of Compliance, OECA.

1 Quick Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division August 30/31, 2005 State EPA.

1 The Changing NPDES Enforcement and Compliance Program The Program The Policies ICIS-NPDES David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting Data.

ICIS-NPDES: PCS Modernization Background Briefing for Catherine McCabe, OECA’s Deputy Assistant Administrator December 29, 2005 Attendees: DH, MS, CM and.

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

1 Brief Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division October 26, 2005 SHORTER VERSION.

ICIS-NPDES: PCS Modernization Background Briefing for Granta Nakayama October 7, 2005.

STREAMLINING STORM WATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH USE OF AN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM April 8, 2004 Presented by John W. Hart 30 th Environmental.

Compliance Monitoring - Inspection. Compliance Monitoring Re-design Compliance Monitoring - Major re-design recently Significant changes were made to.

DRAFT USEPA Office of Compliance Update: 90 CWA Action Plan, State Review Framework, & OECA National Priority Selection Presentation to NACAA Chris Knopes.

1 Understanding the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement Betsy Smidinger, Deputy Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance Office of.

Question to Answer? What is eDMR Why eDMR? Who can use eDMR? What are advantages of eDMR? How does eDMR work? How can facilities sign up?

Municipal Code Title 16 Update: Liquid and Industrial Waste Disposal Board of Water Commissioners November 10, 2014 Item 5.

Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.

NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

David A. Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division, OC

Entering Informal Enforcement Actions

Compliance Monitoring Activities State Inspections

Session: Enforcement Actions

Stormwater Management Program

FORMAL ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

Final Order The Final Order is a very important section that must be completed. In this area, you will put the issuance date, and the requirements that.

Pesticides Dashboard and ECHO

Single Event Violations

ICIS-NPDES Defining What We Need

ICIS-NPDES Expanded Steering Committee Meeting EPA Opening Remarks

What we’ll cover: How EPA enforces the Clean Air Act, including permits Roles for tribal governments in enforcing NSR permits.

DOING MORE WITH LESS Shellie Chard-McClary

Region 4 Air Directors Spring Meeting May 20, 2015

Presentation transcript:

1 EPA RIDE Review Expanded Steering Committee Meeting December 11-12, 2006 Betsy Smidinger USEPA/OECA R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

2 Outline Background on RIDE EPA RIDE Review Process Findings of EPA’s RIDE Review Summary of EPA’s RIDE Review R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

3 Background on RIDE Six NPDES Data Requirements Workgroups  36 state participants representing 21 states  Identified: Data Requirements for the modernized system. Subset of data critical for each area considered in this effort.  Data Requirements Workgroup recommendations sent out for Regional and State review and comment (April 30, 2002). Reviewed by PCS Steering Committee Approved by PCS Modernization Executive Council Process resulted in 332 required data elements for ICIS-NPDES. R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

4 EPA RIDE Review Process Program experts from the Office of Water and Office of Civil Enforcement reevaluated RIDE list from national CWA program management perspective. Shared list of potential elements for deletion from RIDE with Regions for regional CWA program management perspective. OW and OC Office Directors briefed on review findings. List of RIDE under consideration for deletion distributed to Expanded Steering Committee on December 1, R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

5 Findings of RIDE Review 65 elements may not be necessary for EPA national NPDES program management.  41 elements EPA may consider not requiring to be entered in ICIS-NPDES. These data element would still be available in ICIS- NPDES for optional data entry.  24 elements that do not apply to states but are federal-only elements required to be entered by USEPA. These data elements would not be required to be entered by the states. R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

6 Findings of RIDE Review 24 Conditionally Required RIDE Elements  These data elements are only required to be entered under certain circumstances.  RIDE are separately listed since data entry is infrequent. Example: When entering the type of animal for a CAFO permit, if “Other” is selected, then the type of animal must be entered in a separate field. R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

7 Findings of RIDE Review 8 System Required RIDE may not be necessary for EPA national NPDES program management.  System required means the ICIS software requires the data to be entered for the record to be saved.  All system-required elements are included in RIDE.  ICIS software changes necessary to remove these from RIDE. R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements

8 Summary of EPA’s RIDE Review # of Data Elements December 2005 RIDE List332 EPA RIDE Review considered for deletion % reduction from December 2005 RIDE Required ICIS-NPDES Data Elements Clarification on 24 conditionally-required data elements. Additional 8 system required data elements which may not be necessary for EPA national NPDES program management but would need an ICIS software change to be dropped from RIDE.

9 Additional 113 Special Regulatory Elements (was 156) RIDE after EPA’s Review Core Data Requirements # of Data Elements Facility25 (was 75) Permitting73 (was 75) (was 37) Compliance Monitoring35 (was 37) (was 39) Enforcement21 (was 39) (was 176) Total 154 (was 176) Core Data Requirements # of Data Elements Facility25 (was 75) Permitting73 (was 75) (was 37) Compliance Monitoring35 (was 37) (was 39) Enforcement21 (was 39) (was 176) Total 154 (was 176) Biosolids CAFOs CAFOs CSO/SSOs 20 CSO/SSOs 20 Pretreatment 22 Pretreatment 22 Storm Water Storm Water 16 Total RIDE was 332, now is 267 for States NOTE: 145 RIDE elements are system required 49 (was 7) 6 (was 33) (was 39) (was 57)

10 RIDE Review and Data Entry Frequency ICIS-NPDES Data Type (# of RIDE) Sub-Areas Customary Entry Frequency Additional Permit Component Information Facility (25) Basic Information, Contacts, Addresses, Latitude, Longitude Once/ permit cycle N/A Permit (73) Basic Information, Narrative Condition, Permit Schedule, Permitted Feature, Limit Once/ permit cycle Biosolids, CAFO,CSO, Stormwater, Pretreatment, SSO (113) Compliance Monitoring (35) Inspections Once/ year or less DMRs Once/ month/ limit Violations Variable Enforcement (21) Basic Information, Milestones, Sub-activities, Final Orders, Penalties, Compliance Schedules, Complying Actions, Injunctive Relief, Supplemental Environmental Projects Variable N/A

11 EPA RIDE Review EPA has identified a significant portion of RIDE data elements for deletion consideration.  WENDB: 206 Data Elements  RIDE: 332 Data Elements – 65 proposed for deletion = 267 Data entry estimate model will provide additional perspective on resources. R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements