TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
BESIII Offline Software Overview Weidong Li & Yajun Mao BESIII Collaboration Meeting, Beijing 12 January 2006.
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
Status of MC Simulation Huaimin Liu BESIII Collaboration meeting IHEP, Beijing, Jan. 12, 2006.
K1.8 meeting Report from E05 group Toshiyuki Gogami 26 Dec 2014.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Jiawen Zhang, IHEP, 2008, April 10, frascati Status of BEPCII/BESIII and Physics preparation Jiawen Zhang 2008/4/7—10 , PHIPSI08, Frascati.
Time of Flight Counter BESIII International Review Sep. 16, 2002 Heng Yuekun
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Time of Flight Analysis Progress on TOF Software Frank Geurts for the TOF group.
The BESIII Offline Software Weidong Li Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Workshop on the cooperation of PRC-US in HEP 16 June 2006.
BESIII MC Release notes & planned development Dengzy, Hem, Liuhm, Youzy, Yuany Nov. 23, 2005.
BESIII Detector Simulation with Geant4 Huaimin Liu, Guofu Cao IHEP, Beijing 12 th Geant4 Collaboration Workshop Hebden Bridge (UK), September, 2007.
Plastic scintillators for the g-RISING experiments Nami Saito.
Status of Aerogel detector for high pT upgrade at PHENIX Budget from US-J project for next two years : (1) 400 liters of Aerogel (2) 600 photomultiplier.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
BESIII Simulation Status Z.Y. Deng M. He H.M. Liu Y.J. Mao Z.Y. You Y.Yuan BES Annual Meeting June 1, 2005.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Col. Meeting 2006/01/12.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
BESIII Track Extrapolation & Matching Wang Liangliang EPC IHEP.
RICH Simulation in LHCb LHC Detector Simulation Workshop S.Easo, RAL, On behalf of LHCb–RICH group.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
TOFp Status Report Introduction: system overview Functional requirements Analysis status –track extrapolation & matching –start time –stop time –identified.
Current Status of MDC Track Reconstruction MdcPatRec Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CLAS12 Workshop Jefferson Lab February 23, 2016 Time-of-Flight Software Status Jerry Gilfoyle, Evgeny.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Focusing Aerogel RICH Optimization A.Yu.Barnyakov, M.Yu.Barnyakov, V.S.Bobrovnikov, A.R.Buzykaev, V.V.Gulevich, S.A.Kononov, E.A.Kravchenko, A.P.Onuchin.
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Particle Identification (PID) at HIEPA Experiment
“Performance test of a lead glass
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
KM2A Electron Detector Optimization
Calibration, Simulations, and “Remaining” Issues
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of-Flight Detector
The time-of-flight reconstruction & calibration
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Particle identification —TOF detector of BESIII
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
MUC simulation and reconstruction
BESIII TOF Digitization
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )

Outline  TOF reconstruction software status  TOF primary calibration introduction  A Geant4 simulation of the TOF model test-beam  Summary

 Measure the flight time of charged particles.  Comparing the measured time against the predicted time.  Particle identification. BESIII Design TOF Physics Target : Particle ID

Barrel TOF Endcap TOF

TOF Reconstruction Principle

TOF Reconstruction Software Feature  Experience from Belle TOF reconstruction  C++ code  Developed in the Gaudi framework (Boss)

 Main class TofRec TofSys TofGeom TofCalib TofData TofTrk TofHits TofRec TofSys TofGeom TofCalib TofData TofTrk TofHits  Barrel Tof BTofSys BTofMod BTofCnt BTofScint BTofPhotoTube BTofDat BTofCal BTofSys BTofMod BTofCnt BTofScint BTofPhotoTube BTofDat BTofCal  Endcap Tof ETofSys ETofMod ETofCnt ETofScint ETofPhotoTube ETofDat ETofCal TOF Reconstruction Class Design

TOF Reconstruction Process

Current Status  All the code has been debugged in the Boss4.1, a primary version has been put to the CVS web.  MDC reconstructed track and the extrapolated track are replaced by the MC track truth.

TOF Reconstruction Code Test  Use MC data to do the test  A example : 1000 events electron data (single track )  Reconstruction process as showed above  Primary reconstructed result Now The efficiency of the matching hits and tracks is 100%

χ for Different Charged Particles χ 2 for Different Charged Particles

TOF Primary Calibration TOF Primary Calibration  Time calibration  Attenuation length calibration  Effective velocity calibration

Calibration Software Status  Some program has been developed  Mainly use ROOT  Use the MC data to do the calibration

Time Calibration Result Before Calibration After Calibration σ=125 ps σ=83 ps

Attenuation Length Calibration Effective Velocity Calibration Bulk attenuation length: 4 m

TOF Model Test-beam Setting Chart Target C :  10×80mm Magnet to choose particle’s momentum Cherenkov MWPC 80mm×80mm TOF Model S1S1 S2S2 In one room Pb wall T 02 T 01

A Geant4 Simulation of the TOF Test-beam  Geant4 is a detector simulation toolkit.  It can model the optics of the scintillator.  The processes include refraction and reflection at medium boundaries, bulk absorption and Rayleigh scattering.  It is ideal to simulate the TOF

A Geant4 Simulation of the TOF Test-beam  The simulation program has been finished and used  The detector construct as the test-beam  PMT response is simulated

Simulate Comparison Different thickness scintillator  BC408 4 cm  BC408 5 cm  BC408 6 cm Different reflectivity wrap material  Al r = 82 %  ESR r = 98 %

Different Size Simulation Result Why 5 cm has the best time resolution?

ADC Comparison ADC 4 cm < 5 cm < 6 cm 275.7±1.3 pc 282.7±1.3 pc 288.5±1.3 pc

Pulse Rise Time Comparison Rise time 4cm<5cm<6cm ±0.005 ns ±0.005 ns ±0.005 ns

ADC 6 cm > 5cm > 4cm Rise time 4 cm < 5cm < 6cm So σ 5cm < σ 6cm < σ 4cm σ 5cm < σ 6cm < σ 4cm

Different Reflectivity Simulation  ESR r = 98 %  Al r = 82 %  Npe ESR > Al σ Al < σ ESR ?

ADC Comparison ADC Comparison ADC Al < ESR ±1.3 pc ±1.7 pc

3.736±0.005 ns Pulse Rise Time Comparison ADC ESR>Al but Rise time Al<ESR but Rise time Al<ESR So σ Al < σ ESR So σ Al < σ ESR 3.956±0.006 ns

Summary  TOF reconstruction software has been developed, and there is a primary version.  Primary TOF calibration has been done.  A Geant4 simulation of the TOF test-beam has been done, Some experiment result can be explained by simulation.

Next to do  More TOF reconstruction work  A complete TOF calibration software development  Calibration methods study  More detailed simulation work

Thank you !