Understanding and Interpreting Sales View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D. 3435 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 452-5130  (310)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding and Interpreting Sales View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203 Santa Monica, CA (310) (310)
Advertisements

Understanding and Using Your DEVELOPMENTVIEW360 Report
Understanding and Interpreting Manager View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203 Santa Monica, CA (310) (310)
Understanding and Using Your Executive View 360 Report Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203 Santa Monica, CA (310) (310)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Interpreting the People Skills Report. Why a multi-rater? Helps you understand others’ perceptions of your behavior. These are neither “right” or “wrong”—they.
360-degree Look at Me The Leadership Effectiveness Inventory (LEI)
Emotional Intelligence View 360 Administration and Interpretation.
Mary Jo Sariscsany Assessing Health- Related Fitness and Physical Activity 13 chapter.
Gathering Performance Information: Overview
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.
Chapter 08 Performance Management Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Human Resource Management:
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Hay Group Pathfinder TM The On-line Development Tool.
“LEADS”: Leadership Enhancement And Development System.
360-degree feedback Briefing for Participants Full Circle Feedback
Washington State Prevention Summit Analyzing and Preparing Data for Outcome-Based Evaluation Using the Assigned Measures and the PBPS Outcomes Report.
Administration and Interpretation of the Managerial Inbasket Simulation Kenneth M. Nowack Ph.D th Street Suite 2  Santa Monica, CA (310)
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Welcome to the Information Session on Leadership Competency Models
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Using Talent Accelerator to Maximize the Impact of 360 Degree Feedback Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Senior Team Briefing Implementing 360 Degree Feedback.
HRM-755 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF LECTURE: TWENTY SIX 1.
Improving Management Effectiveness HR Chally Employee selection tool.
Momentor How-To Guide 1 Maximizing the Benefits of using Momentor for Coaching.
TeamView/ th Street Suite 2 Santa Monica, CA 
Performance Management
Module 1 Introduction to SRL. Aims of the Masterclass Understand the principles of self regulated learning (SRL) and how they apply to GP training Develop.
Understanding and Interpreting the Transformational Leadership Questionnaire Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA.
High Performance Development Model 360 Degree Feedback Process Respondent Orientation.
1 WRS Feedback Overview. 2 Agenda Introduction to WRS Assessment Feedback Report Developmental Planning Best Practices Summary/Wrap Up.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Understanding and Interpreting the Transformational Leadership Questionnaire Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA.
Momentor for 360s How-To-Guide 1 Maximizing the benefits of using Momentor.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Understanding and Interpreting Sales Manager View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA (310)
Understanding and Interpreting Sales Manager View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA (310)
…A goal setting and evaluation tool to help coaches be more successful 3435 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA (310)  (310)
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments Summary of Scope & Methodology A. Levin © SYNERGY Consulting Services Corporation, 1999.
Performance Management
August 10, 2004 “Best in Class” Leadership Coaching Program at CSAA.
 2013 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved. Executive Dimensions® Orientation Template Executive Dimensions® This template is designed.
360 By Design® Orientation Template
360 Degree Feedback Process Development Planning Session.
360 Feedback A Tool For Improving Individual And Organizational Effectiveness.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Understanding and Using Your Leader View 360 Report Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA (310) 
Performance Appraisal Basics MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Joint Warfare Analysis Center 360 Degree Feedback Process Rater Orientation.
STS International, Inc. PERSONAL LEADERSHIP A framework for exploring and evaluating Leadership Competency for the 21 st Century. COMMUNICATION Visioning.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Indistar® Tools for Coaching And Using Coach’s Critiques.
© Copyright  People at Work Project - Overview  People at Work Project - Theoretical Underpinnings  People at.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
After-Session Actions
2016 Year-End Performance Management
Skills for Success! Strategy & Implementation Guide
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Emotional Intelligence View 360
Chapter 8 Performance Management and Employee Development
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Interpreting Sales View 360 Kenneth M. Nowack, Ph.D Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 203  Santa Monica, CA (310)  (310) Fax

Sales View 360 Presentation Outline  Sales View 360 Online Process  Understanding and Using Your Sales View 360 Results  Translating Awareness into Behavior Change: Talent Accelerator  Next Steps/Questions

Consultative Sales Skill Model

Sales View 360 Online Process

 Sales View 360 is a comprehensive 360- degree feedback tool for rigorous, in-depth report of strengths and developmental needs aimed at sales and account representatives  Sales View 360 is ideal for use in sales coaching and training programs, and to support the developmental section of corporate performance evaluation systems What is Sales View 360?

Sales View 360 Online Process

Participant Invitation

Nominating Raters

Online Assessment

Editing and Submitting Completed Assessment

Interpreting Your Sales View 360 Feedback Report

Emotional Reactions to Feedback: GRASP Model G rin or Grimace R ecognize or Reject A ct or Accept S trategize & P artner Emotional Reaction Cognitive Reaction Commitment Reaction Behavioral Reaction

Sales View Competencies/52 Questions Sales  Consultative Sales Orientation  Service Focus  Sales Planning/Territory Management Intrapersonal Leadership  Achievement Striving  Adaptability/Resilience  Problem Solving  Self-Development Interpersonal Leadership  Enabling Trust  Demonstrating Trust  Conflict Resolution  Influence/Negotiation  Listening  Oral/Written Communication

 Measures 13 Competencies/52 Questions:  Sales  Interpersonal  Intrapersonal  Online Administration  Reliable and Valid Scales  Comprehensive Summary Feedback Report Sales View 360 Features

 Sales View 360 Competency Definitions and Conceptual Model  Self-Awareness/Social Awareness Comparison Graphs  Overall Competency Graphs (self and other comparisons)  Most Frequent/Least Frequent Behavior Summary  Summary of Average Scores by Rater Category with Statistical Measure of Rater Agreement  Written Comments by Raters  Developmental Action Plan Sales View 360 Report

KEY POINTS  All raters are anonymous except for the “manager”  Online administration uses passwords to protect confidentiality (Internet administration)  No line or bar graphs are shown unless at least two raters respond in a rater category (anonymity protection)  The summary feedback report is shared only with the respondent and is intended for development purposes only  The respondent decides how much of the summary feedback report he/she wants to share with others Confidentiality of the 360 Feedback Process

Self-Other Perceptions: What Are Others Really Rating? PEERS REPORTS BOSS Performance Interpersonal Factors Leadership Potential

 Self-Other Comparisons  Graphical Comparisons “Johari Window”  Most and Least Frequently Observed Behaviors  Summary of Average Scores  Statistical Measure of Rater Agreement  Written Comments Sales View 360 Feedback Report Components

Sales View 360

KEY POINTS  Sale View 360 uses average scores based on the 1 to 5 “positive response” frequency scale (Almost never, Infrequently, Sometimes, Frequently, Almost Always)  The bar graphs summarize self and other perceptions on each of the 13 separate competencies  The legend to the right of the graph will summarize average score and number of raters for each category  Range of scores for each rater group are graphed Sales View 360 Graphs Self-Other Perceptions

Sales View 360 provides a snapshot of self/social awareness in a series of graphs highlighting four areas: 1. Potential Strengths (Low Self Ratings & High Other Ratings) 2. Confirmed Strengths (High Self Ratings & High Other Ratings) 3. Potential Development Areas (High Self Ratings & Low Other Ratings) 4. Confirmed Development Areas (Low Self Ratings & Low Other Ratings) Sales View 360 Awareness View Section

Sales View 360 Self-Awareness View

Sale View 360 Self-Other Perceptions

KEY POINTS  The “Most Frequent” section and “Least Frequent” section summarizes those competencies and behaviors that were most frequently/least frequently observed by various rater groups  The number in the first column corresponds to the average score for all raters providing feedback (1 to 5 scale)  The “Most Frequent” should be considered as perceived strengths to leverage and build on  The “Least Frequent” should be considered as possible behaviors to practice more frequently Sales View 360 Most Frequent/Least Frequent Section

KEY POINTS  Each Sales View 360 question is summarized and categorized in its appropriate competency  Average scores across all raters are reported for each competency and question  A statistical measure of rater agreement based on the standard deviation is reported as a percentage—a score less than 50% suggests that the raters providing feedback had enough disagreement to warrant a cautious interpretation of the average score reported (e.g., raters had diverse perceptions and rated the participant quite differently on that question or competency) Sales View 360 Behavior Summary

KEY POINTS  Three open ended comments: Doing More, Doing Less, Doing Differently  Comments are randomly listed by all raters who volunteered to share written perceptions to two open- ended questions (perceptions of strengths and development areas)  Comments are provided verbatim from the online questionnaire—no editing  Some comments are specific, behavioral and constructive—others may be less useful or hard to understand  It is important to focus on themes that emerge, rather than, to dwell on any one individual comment Sales View 360 Written Comments Section

Sales View 360 Feedback Report Questions to Consider  Do I understand my Sales View 360 feedback report?  Does it seem accurate/valid?  Is the feedback similar or different for the different rater groups?  Are the areas perceived by others for development relevant to my current or future position?  Am I motivated to change?

Sales View 360: Next Steps  Review your Sales 360 feedback report  Thank your invited raters and share something you learned from their feedback  Use Talent Accelerator to identify specific developmental goals & draft a development plan  Meet with your manager to discuss your plan  Implement your development plan  Track and monitor progress  Measure progress on the development plan using the ViewSuite Pulse mini-evaluation  Re-assess Sales View 360 in months

Conscious Incompetence Conscious Competence Unconscious Incompetence Unconscious Competence Talent Accelerator Behavior Change Model Feedback from Assessments Talent Accelerator and Coaching and Pulse Mini-360 Evaluation

 Development Resource Library: Comprehensive source of readings, websites, media, and suggestions to facilitate your development  Feedback Reports: Electronic copy of your assessment summary report.  Development Suggestions: Tips and developmental suggestions and tips to enhance your effectiveness  Development Journal: Opportunity for participants to maintain a confidential journal to reflect on their reactions and feelings about his/her developmental journey.  Development Planning “Wizard”: Walks you through your assessment and provide a structured way to select developmental competencies  Automated Reminders: Select how often you want the system to send you reminders about due dates on your development plan (Preference Tab). Components of the Talent Accelerator

 Users are sent an with a unique username/password to allow access to Talent Accelerator  Access to Talent Accelerator is for a 12-month period  Upon log in users will have an electronic copy of his/her assessment report and begin to use the development “wizard” to identify one or more competency areas to focus on those behaviors that are most important  At any time users can access the Competency Resource Library to find readings, articles, websites, developmental suggestions, media, blogs, podcasts and other resources targeted to the specific developmental areas of interest  Once the developmental action plans are finalized, users can go in Talent Accelerator and update progress and set new goals Talent Accelerator Process

Description  Is not a reassessment of the initial 360 feedback assessment  Provides a metric of actual behavior change  Provides coaches and organizations with a tool to demonstrate the value of their 360 degree and coaching interventions View Suite 360 Pulse Mini-360 Survey Evaluation

View Suite 360 Pulse Online Evaluation Report

360° Feedback Selected References  Nowack, K. (2009). Leveraging 360 feedback to facilitate successful behavior change. Consulting Psychology: Practice and Research, 61,  Nowack, K. (2005). Longitudinal evaluation of a 360 degree feedback program: Implications for best practices. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, March  Nowack, K. (1999). 360-Degree feedback. In DG Langdon, KS Whiteside, & MM McKenna (Eds.), Intervention: 50 Performance Technology Tools, Jossey-Bass, Inc., pp  Nowack, K., Hartley, G, & Bradley, W. (1999). Evaluating results of your 360-degree feedback intervention. Training and Development, 53,  Nowack, K. (1999). Manager View/360. In Fleenor, J. & Leslie, J. (Eds.). Feedback to managers: A review and comparison of sixteen multi-rater feedback instruments (3 rd edition). Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.,  Wimer & Nowack (1998). 13 Common mistakes in implementing multi-rater systems. Training and Development, 52,  Nowack, K. & Wimer, S. (1997). Coaching for human performance. Training and Development, 51,  Nowack, K. (1997). Congruence between self and other ratings and assessment center performance. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12,  Nowack, K. (1994). The secrets of succession. Training & Development, 48,  Nowack, K. (1993). 360-degree feedback: The whole story. Training & Development, 47,  Nowack, K. (1992). Self-assessment and rater-assessment as a dimension of management development. Human Resources Development Quarterly, 3,