1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ireland Stat Fiachra Kennedy Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit Department of Public Expenditure & Reform.

Advertisements

Forest Service Management Systems (MS) for Forest Highways (FH) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.

Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.

1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.

HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.

December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.

Medication Safety Standard 4 Part 1- Introduction Margaret Duguid, Pharmaceutical Advisor Graham Bedford, Medication Safety Program Manager Standard 4.

HSM Implementation Tools Safety Analyst

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.

New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.

Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.

Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.

Quality Improvement Capacity for Impact Project (QICIP) Pre-Review Conference Call Competitive Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA March 25,

Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.

Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.

Adjusting EPLC to your Project Colleen Robinson & Teresa Kinley Friday, February 6, 2009.

DOE OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY Renewable Energy Project Development and Finance Framework: The 5 Step Process 1.

Transit Capital & Operating Priorities Municipal Capital Project Priorities Municipal Policy Document Related Planning Activities 2 VIA 2040 Plan COSA.

Planning, Organizing, and Managing a Small Business.

Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.

AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.

GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.

AANDC Presentation at the OFNTSC Southern Tribal Council Meeting Chippewas of Rama, Ontario October , 2012.

U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.

GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.

Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safety Investment Program (SIP) Policies for Oregon Literature Review Findings.

MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.

FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) AASHTO National Connected.

NGA Federal Facilities Task Force Brief Update & Key Topics for Meeting May 16, 2002 Washington DC Jerry Boese Ross & Associates Environmental Consulting,

NEKIA Business Development Progress Report Board of Directors Meeting May 7,2003.

Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.

CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.

2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.

A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.

Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.

Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.

Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.

1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.

All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.

All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.

Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.

Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,

1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 3 – Safety Management Process – Other Steps CEE 763.

Weighted Guidelines Cost Efficiency Factor. Cost Efficiency Provides additional profit $ for reduction in costs on the “pending” contract Range is 0 –

Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.

Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.

CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.

1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.

Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.

1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.

Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.

King County Bridges and Roads Task Force Summary of Interviews with Task Force Members Presented by Triangle Associates, Inc. For King County and the Bridges.

PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.

Roles and Responsibilities (Tab 3). Roles and Responsibilities 2 At the end of this module, participants will be able to: Distinguish between the roles.

LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.

Pedestrian Facility Improvement Program

Cost Efficiency Factor

Chelan County Transportation Element Update

Using CMF’s in Benefit/Cost Analysis and Project Prioritization

Choosing the Right Project

Infrastructure Strategy 1: Implement roadway improvements that compensate for impacts of aging on safe driving Strategy 2: Implement improvements to.

GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points

Process and Procedure Documentation

Clark County, WA Safety Management Program

Presentation transcript:

1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process

Objective Develop the list of high-priority safety improvement projects – For locations identified in Step 2 – Using the most appropriate countermeasure indentified in Step 3 2 Element 1, Step 4: Prioritize Projects

Outcome Safety project for each “at-risk” candidate location. The roll-up of the individual projects creates the systemic safety program for the agency’s system. 3 Element 1, Step 4: Prioritize Projects

Data Needs A basic understanding of your agency’s priorities, practices, and policies as they relate to project and program development. Current information relating to expected implementation costs and estimated crash reduction associated with the various safety improvement strategies. 4 Element 1, Step 4: Prioritize Projects

Element 1: Step 4 5 Element 1, Step 4: Prioritize Projects

Element 1: Step 4, Task 1 Create A Decision Process Purpose: Create a decision process to select countermeasures – May consider traffic, geometric, crash history when setting criteria Provide a measure of consistency for applying countermeasures for “at-risk” locations. Element 1: Step 4, Task 1 6

Element 1: Step 4, Task 1 Create A Decision Process Process: 1.Identify information (and their criteria) that will be used to determine when is countermeasure an option. 2.Create a decision process using the criteria for each focus crash type and/or facility type. Element 1: Step 4, Task 1 7

Decision Process – Segments 8 Element 1: Step 4, Task 1

Decision Process - Rural Intersections 9 Element 1: Step 4, Task 1

Element 1: Step 4, Task 2 Develop Safety Projects Purpose: Select countermeasures for safety investments and determine how to efficiently bundle projects in a design package for contract letting. Element 1: Step 4, Task 2 10

Element 1: Step 4, Task 2 Develop Safety Projects Process: 1.Apply the decision process (Step 4, Task 1) to identify a specific countermeasure(s) for each “at- risk” site. 2.At each site, document countermeasure(s) selected, estimated implementation cost, and a summary of the risk factor scoring. 3.Decide how to efficiently bundle various projects together into one design package for contract letting. Element 1: Step 4, Task 2 11

Example Project Summary Sheets 12 Rural Intersection Urban Intersection - Corridors Element 1: Step 4, Task 2

Element 1: Step 4, Task 3 Prioritize Safety Project Implementation Purpose: Identify implementation order. Process: 1.Prioritize the projects into an order for implementation. – Other considerations: funding, other programmed projects, time required to develop project plans, amount of public outreach needed, etc. Element 1: Step 4, Task 3 13

Prioritize Safety Projects Element 1: Step 4, Task 3 14