IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad 0.329 m 3.67 mrad 60 m 10 20 30 0.188036 m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e - 325 GeV p.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
Advertisements

M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
E.C. Aschenauer for the group.  Optimize the IR design to be able to integrate  the luminosity monitor  the lepton polarimeter  the low Q 2 -tagger.
EIC Detectors Tanja Horn Tanja Horn, CUA Colloquium Tanja Horn, EIC Detectors, INT10-3 INT10-3 “Science Case for an EIC”, Institute for Nuclear Theory,
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
Joanne Beebe-Wang 1/10/10 1 MeRHIC IR & Detector MeRHIC Interaction Region & Detector Integration Joanne Beebe-Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory EIC.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
1 EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook June 27, 2014 Request for these slides: Comment on “EIC working group activities at Jefferson Lab, and how people could.
1 News from eRHIC Matt Lamont, Thomas Ullrich, William Foreman, Anders Kirleis, Michael Savastio, Elke Aschenauer and the CAD-eRHIC Team E.C. AschenauerEIC-Convener.
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
EIC Detector Overview Tanja Horn Tanja Horn, EIC Detector Overview, EIC Advisory Committee 2011 Electron-Ion Collider Advisory Committee, Jefferson Laboratory,
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 11.
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: arXiv:
E.C. AschenauerPSTP-2013, Charlotesville, VA1. The Pillars of the eRHIC Physics program E.C. AschenauerPSTP-2013, Charlotesville, VA 2 Wide physics program.
POETIC 2012 Indiana University R. D. McKeown 12 GeV CEBAF.
1 EIC Update R. D. McKeown Presentation to EICAC April 10, 2011 (Thanks to R. Ent, A. Hutton, H. Montgomery, M. Farkhondeh, others)
Common Detector R&D Plan for MeRHIC & MEIC E.C. JLab, November
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
Some thoughts about the IR-Design and Si-tracking E.C. AschenauerEIC Tracking R&D Meeting, March
MEIC Detector Rolf Ent MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
1 EIC EW Meeting, W&M, VA, May 2010 E.C. Aschenauer.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
Electron Ion Collider A. Accardi, R. Ent, V. Guzey, Tanja Horn, C. Hyde, A. Prokudin, P. Nadel-Turonski, C. Weiss, … + CASA/accelerator team LRP 2007 JLab.
Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Detector & Interaction Region Concepts for DES and SIDIS Pawel Nadel-Turonski Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA EICC meeting, January 10–12, 2010, Stony.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Overview of IR Design V.S. Morozov 1, P. Brindza 1, A. Camsonne 1, Ya.S. Derbenev 1, R. Ent 1, D. Gaskell 1, F. Lin 1, P. Nadel-Turonski 1, M. Ungaro 1,
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Current eRHIC IR Design  Important features  10 mrad crossing angle Needs to be integrated into the current STAR and upgrades Important for luminosity.
EIC Overview Rolf Ent Nuclear Chromo-Dynamic Studies with a Future EIC Workshop at Argonne National Laboratory April 07-09, 2010 (mainly accelerator.
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Detector Here, we will only discuss a multi-purpose high-luminosity ep detector, not a dedicated lower-luminosity ep/eA detector as.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
BeAST Detector (Brookhaven eA Solenoidal Tracker) Alexander Kiselev for the BNL EIC taskforce Berkeley EIC User Group Meeting Jan’2016.
Some thoughts to stimulate Discussion E.C. Stony Brook, January
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle New Design: for eRHIC with CEC: 20 x 325 with b* of 5cm: 1.4x10 34 cm -2 s -1 as the the luminosity does.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Interaction Region and Detector
MEIC Interaction Region & Tagging
IR- and Detector Design Considerations
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
JLEIC Detector Simulation Forward Ion Detection
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
A brief Introduction of eRHIC
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
Specifications for the JLEIC IR Magnets
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Introduction and Workshop Charge
Update on JLEIC Interaction Region Design
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Overview Slides for JLEIC Presenters
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
HE-JLEIC Luminosity Estimate
Presentation transcript:

IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad m 3.67 mrad 60 m m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e GeV p 125 GeV/u ions eRHIC - Geometry high-lumi IR with β*=5 cm, l*=4.5 m and 10 mrad crossing angle E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle Week 11 m Spinrotator

A detector integrated into IR E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle Week 12 ZDC FPD  for ERL solution need not to measure electron polarization bunch by bunch  need still to integrate luminosity monitor  need still to integrate hadronic polarimeters, maybe at different IP FED space for e-polarimetry and luminosity measurements

Can we detect DVCS-protons and Au break up p E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle Week 13  track the protons through solenoid, quads and dipole with hector  beam angular spread 0.1mrad at IR  Quads +/- 5mrad acceptance  Proton-beam: p’ z > 0.9p z  100 GeV: p t max < 0.45 GeV  t max < 0.2 GeV 2  Detector: acceptance starts Θ > 50mrad  need more work to find a way to cover intermediate range  solution could be to do the same as for the electrons swap the dipole and quads dipole and quads proton track  p=10% proton track  p=20% Equivalent to fragmenting protons from Au in Au optics (197/79:1 ~2.5:1) proton track  p=40%

Downstream dipole on ion beam line ONLY has several advantages Downstream dipole on ion beam line ONLY has several advantages – No synchrotron radiation – Electron quads can be placed close to IP – Dipole field not determined by electron energy – Positive particles are bent away from the electron beam – Long recoil baryon flight path gives access to low -t – Dipole does not interfere with RICH and forward calorimeters Excellent acceptance (hermeticity) Excellent acceptance (hermeticity) solenoid electron FFQs 100 mrad 0 mrad ion dipole w/ detectors (approximately to scale) ions electrons IP detectors ion FFQs 2+3 m 2 m exclusive mesons ° recoil baryons 4 on 30 GeV Q 2 > 10 GeV 2 Make use of a 100 mr crossing angle for ions! Slides Rolf Ent Jlab: Detector/IR cartoon E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle Week 14