First Action Interview Pilot Program Legal Secretaries & Administrators Conference June 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patent Prosecution June 2013 June 13, 2013.
Advertisements

Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office Bob Olszewski, Director TC 2900 United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association RCE Practice: Pilot Programs and Delays in Examination Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP.
1 How to survive an IRS project audit!. The IRS wants to ensure that the federal subsidy provided by the interest exclusion on bonds is properly applied.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
1 Patent Operations: Updates & Highlights Austin Intellectual Property Law Association Austin, TX March 23, 2010.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Accelerated Examination Bennett Celsa (TC 1600: QAS)
John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program Patents – Past, Present and Future.
Kevin Deardorff Assistant Division Chief, Decennial Management Division U.S. Census Bureau 2014 SDC / CIC Conference April 2, Census Updates.
Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Green Technology Petition Pilot Robert W. Bahr. 2 Green Tech: Discussion Points 1. Authority and Overview: resources / overview 2.Petition Requirement:
Boston Patent Law Association Joseph Rolla – Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
Chapter 5 Selecting and Developing Staff. Objectives: §1. List and explain the elements of a Job Description. §2. List the elements of a good system or.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
Patent Quality Assurance Program. 2 Office of Patent Quality Assurance (OPQA) Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Office of Patent Quality Assurance.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Accelerated Examination Program Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600.
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
Customer Partnership Meeting John Doll Commissioner for Patents.
Program Compliance Review Overview IFTA Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada July 21-22, 2006 Presented by Dick Beckner Debora Meise Jay Starling.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
November 29, Global Intellectual Property Academy Advanced Patents Program Kery Fries, Senior Legal Advisor Mark Polutta, Senior Legal Advisor Office.
Human Capital Office Cultivating Talent, Diversity and Service Servicewide New Employee Ambassador Program NTEU Briefing.
1 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership June 1, 2010 Valencia Martin-Wallace – Director, Technology Center 2400.
State Program Review Process Presented by GSFC Compliance Team.
1 EXPEDITED EXAMINATION. 2 Expedited Examination: Index MPEP § Petition To Make Special (1) Applicant ’s Age or Health (2) Patent Prosecution Highway.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100 United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C U.S. Patent Claims By James A. Larson.
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Patent Prosecution May PCT- RCE Zombie 371 National Stage PCT Applications –Not Allowed to file an RCE until signed inventor oath/declaration is.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
2007 Revisions to Japanese Patent Law. 2 #1 Period for Filing Divisional Applications (A) BeforeBefore AfterAfter Notice of Allowance Divisional Application.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Prosecution Lunch October Bits and Pieces from the Patent Side Crowing about reduction in pending cases –From 750K a year ago to about 708K now.
1. Video Conference Interviews 2 Sean Hagan Director of the Midwest Regional United States Patent and Trademark Office Webinar for Knobbe Martens January.
Presentation to the Local Authorities Revenue Management Association – October 2012 The role of the Office of the Information Commissioner.
Sudhanshu C. Pathak Resource Supervisor Denver Satellite Office USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Office Examiner Interview Practice NAPP Annual.
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent August 2016
Claims and Continuations Final Rule
Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting, March 15, 2005
First Action Interview Pilot Program
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
Boston Patent Law Association Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

First Action Interview Pilot Program Legal Secretaries & Administrators Conference June 18, 2009

First Action Interview Pilot Program Pilot Program Objectives: Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the merits Advance examination of applications once taken up in turn Facilitate resolution of issues for timely disposition of an application

First Action Interview Pilot Program Some of the current criteria: –Utility applications assigned to certain classes and art units Including national stage applications under 35 USC 371 Excluding design, plant, and reissue applications –The application contains: No more than three independent and twenty total claims; and No multiple dependent claims –The request to participate in the pilot program must be filed before the mailing of a first Office action on the merits The Office is considering an expansion of the pilot (requests stopped being received 10/21/08)

Overview of the process First Action Interview Pilot Program 1 st Action Interview Request Improper Request Pre-Interview Communication Letter Requesting no Interview Applicant Initiated Interview Request First-Action Interview Office Action Interview Summary Interview OR Amendment - Case returns to normal processing ApplicantUSPTOApplicant & USPTO Applicant USPTO Applicant 30 days 30 day extension available 30 days 60 days FOAM* * FAOM – first action on the merits

Sample Pre- Interview Communication found at es/pac/dapp/opla/preognotice/f ai_example_1.pdf

First Action Interview Pilot Details Applications Eligible for the Pilot 1.Subject Matter Eligibility –Two technology areas in TC2100 Computer networks (now in TC2400) Database and File Management 2.Filing Date Eligibility –Each technology area had filing date requirements  Overall, approximately 5500 applications were eligible.

First Action Interview Stats as of 5/29/ Requests to join the pilot were received –This represents approx 9% of eligible applications 376 Pre-Interview Communications mailed 285 Interviews held 240 First-action interview Office actions mailed

First Action Interview Stats as of 5/29/09 88 applications have been allowed –26 allowed without/before pre-interview communication –46 allowed after pre-interview communication but before FAI Office action –16 allowed after FAI Office action Thus, so far, 23% of applications are allowed prior to First-Action on the merits –Typical first-action allowance rate in 2100 is approx 3.9% (excluding CONs and RCEs)

First Action Interview Pilot Next Steps Expand pilot into other technology areas –POPA agreed to a limited expansion Automate more of the application processing and tracking Consider allowing extensions of time to respond to Pre-Interview Communication Give applicants the opportunity to waive the First-Action Interview Office Action Surveying the applicants

Overview of the process First Action Interview Pilot Program 1 st Action Interview Request Improper Request Pre-Interview Communication Letter Requesting no Interview Applicant Initiated Interview Request First-Action Interview Office Action Interview Summary Interview OR Amendment - Case returns to normal processing ApplicantUSPTOApplicant & USPTO Applicant USPTO Applicant 30 days 30 day extension available 30 days 60 days FOAM* * FAOM – first action on the merits

Interview First-Action Interview Office Action Interview Summary Amendment - Case returns to normal processing Applicant waives FAI Office Action Final Rejection Interview Summary First Action Interview Pilot Program – process change

First Action Interview Pilot Program Contacts –Joseph Weiss –Andrew Hirshfeld –Wendy Garber –John Follansbee