What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Julie Fredericks Teachers Development Group.  Definition and Purpose  What is a mathematical justification and what purposes does mathematical justification.
CCSSM National Professional Development Standards for Mathematical Practice Ellen Whitesides Director, Common Core State Standards Projects.
Mathematical Practices 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and.
Presented at the CaMSP Learning Network Meeting Sacramento, CA April 4, 2011 Compiled and Presented by Susie W. Håkansson, Ph.D. California.
Developing Number and Operations through Reasoning, Sensemaking and Connections Minnesota Council of Teachers of Mathematics April 27, 2013 Linda Gojak,
An Overview of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Practice for use with the Common Core Essential Elements The present publication was developed.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason.
CCSSM National Professional Development Fraction Domain Sandi Campi, Mississippi Bend AEA Nell Cobb, DePaul University Grade 3.
Effective Math Questioning
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Number Talks Math Institute Summer Activating Strategy Discussion: Which common errors would you expect to see? =
Correlating Go Math & Standards for Mathematical Practices
Support Math Reasoning By Linking Arithmetic to Algebra Virginia Bastable GSDMC 2013.
K – 12 Common Core California Standards in Mathematics Considerations for English Learners Presented by: Natalie Albrizzio Secondary Math Specialist Ventura.
April 15,  Given a presentation on Common Core Math, participants will be able to incorporate at least one mathematical practice idea into a lesson.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. ARGUMENTATION PRE-WRITE (~15 MINS) When done, please make sure your name is on it and put into the Table.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Discourse and Mathematics: Get Connected! Rosann Hollinger and Bernard Rahming Milwaukee Public Schools April 27, 2012 NCTM Annual Meeting Philadelphia.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Writing and Reasoning in Mathematics Constructing Viable Arguments August 22, 2012 Patrick Callahan Co-Director, California Mathematics Project.
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Welcome to Common Core Math Night Grades K - 6. Fortune 500 Survey On Needed Workforce Skills  Critical Thinking/Problem Solving  Oral and Written Communication.
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
Bridging Practices Among CT Mathematics Educators MSP Grant – Summer Workshop June 23, 2014 WELCOME!! Please look at the hanging chart for your table number.
Building Community within the Mathematics Classroom Unit of Study 0 Global Concept Guide: 1 of 1.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Mathematical Practices.  Goals today: ◦ Become familiar with the Mathematical Practices and what they mean and look like in instruction ◦ Addition.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Standards of Mathematical Practice
Argumentation Day 4 Math Bridging Practices Monday August 18, 2014.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Standards of Mathematical Practice.
Sunnyside School District
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Do Now Table Dilemma Square tables at Giovanni’s Pizza seat 4 people each. For bigger groups, square tables can be joined. Tables can be pushed together.
Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Standards of Mathematical Practice.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Module 6 Conceptual Lessons.
Making an Impact in a Diplomas Now Mathematics Classroom.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, March 7th - 4pm Eastern Time Reasoning & Explaining in the Practices Presented by Sara Delano Moore,
Welcome to …. Agenda Standards for Mathematical Practice 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 Adding a One Task Standards for Mathematical Practice 5 Standards for Mathematical.
Welcome to …. Agenda Hand Shake Problem Standards for Mathematical Practice 2 Standards for Mathematical Practice 3 Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Vacaville USD September 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and Effective Questions Word Problems Ratios and Proportions.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Practice Standards.
Iris M. RiggsKelli Wasserman CSUSBMathematics Consultant Orchestrating Discussion: Fractions on the Number Line California Mathematics Conference Palm.
Presented by Heather Sparks, NBCT 2009 Oklahoma Teacher of the Year June 4, 2012.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
More Than Mistakes (construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of
Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Module 1 Bridging Math Practices Math-Science Partnership Grant.
Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Session 1 Bridging Math Practices was funded by a grant from the CT State Department of Education.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Going Deeper with Practice and Content
Module 5: Feedback to Advance Student Argumentation
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Building Community within the Mathematics Classroom
Focus on Implementation- Classroom Discourse
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math
Cultivating Math Conversation Through Questioning
Practice 1- Make Sense of Problems and Persevere in Solving Them
Presentation transcript:

What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University) ATOMIC December 8, 2015 Session 4

As an example, create an argument for the following. This may help you think through what a mathematical argument is… When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Think 1)Is this statement (claim) true? 2)What’s your argument to show that it is or is not true? What is a mathematical argument? Introduce yourself to your neighbor Share some ideas from what you wrote WARM UP!

One way to think about arguments Another way to think about arguments… THIS IS NOT WHAT WE MEAN! avoid, avoid, avoid

A mathematical argument It is… ◦ A sequence of statements and reasons given with the aim of demonstrating that a claim is true or false It is not… ◦ Solely an explanation of what you did (steps) ◦ A recounting of your problem solving process ◦ Explaining why you personally think it’s true for reasons that are not necessarily mathematical (e.g., popular consensus; external authority, etc. It’s true because John said it, and he’s always right.)

Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

THE SUM OF TWO CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS IS ODD Let’s consider When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd.

Discuss: What is each student’s argument? Which argument(s) show the claim is true? How are they similar? How are they different?

When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Micah ’ s Response 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and = 25 and 25 is an odd number and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number.

When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Roland’s Response The answer is always odd. A number + The next number = An odd number There’s always one left over when you put them together, so it’s odd.

When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Angel ’ s Response Consecutive numbers go even, odd, even, odd, and so on. So if you take any two consecutive numbers, you will always get one even and one odd number. And we know that when you add any even number with any odd number the answer is always odd. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number.

When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Kira’s Response Consecutive numbers are n and n+1. Add the two numbers: n + (n+1) = 2n + 1 You get 2n + 1 which is always an odd number, because an odd number leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. (2 goes into 2n + 1 n times, with a remainder of 1)

Comments on the approaches Example-based (Micah) Pictorial (Roland) Narrative (Angel) Symbolic/algebraic (Kira)

Summary Take-aways Mathematical argument: logical chain to show it is true or false There are many ways to construct an argument! Requires using understandings of consecutive numbers and odd/even numbers, or more generally, key math ideas. Empirical – good beginning; not enough. Need to address question: Why MUST it be so? ◦ Counter example

NUMBER TALK -- THINK! 16 x 25 When you have a strategy for finding the answer, show me one finger in front of you. Keep thinking. If you get a second strategy, show 2 fingers. What’s the difference between giving an explanation of one’s steps and giving a mathematical argument?

Explanation of Steps Argument I took 16 and split it into 10 and 6. I multiplied 10 by 25, and I multiplied 6 by 25. And then I added those 2 numbers together. I took 16 and split it into 10 and 6 because I need to find 16 groups of 25, and so I can find 10 groups of 25 and then add to it 6 more groups of 25. So I multiplied 10 by 25 and 6 by 25. I added those two numbers together to give me 16 25s total, which is what I need. Explanation of Steps vs Argument Student Work 16 = x 25 = x 25 = = 400

Summary Take-aways Arguments are beyond sharing steps and showing your work Arguments include the reasons (warrants, connectors) that link student’s work to a claim (the claim, answer, what is true) Student Work Claim, Answer, Result Reasons (warrants)

ARGUMENTATION AS SOMETHING STUDENTS DO IN THE CLASSROOM

Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Constructing viable arguments use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. make conjectures, including reason inductively about data build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures analyze situations by breaking them into cases recognize and use counterexamples justify their conclusions communicate them to others respond to the arguments of others distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades.

Welcome to Argumentation in Grade 3 Students have worked on a sorting task with the focus on “Is it a Half?” These video clips are from one lesson in the middle of the school year, about two weeks into a unit on fractions The purpose of the lesson was to understand half in many different ways The lesson task is available at:

ARGUMENTATION IN ACTION Is It A Half? Sarah Brown’s 3 rd -Grade Class

IS IT A HALF Lesson Plan “At the beginning of the class, we brainstormed a list of things that were “a half.” Students said things like half and apple, half moon, half full. I paired them up for this activity not by ability but to be sure there would be some kind of give-and-take with pair because I wanted the argumentation to come out and not one person doing everything. The students communicated orally with their partners to complete this activity. Students had about minutes to work on this. Then we came together for a whole group discussion.”

Questions for Clip 1 Guiding Questions a. What did Sarah do to support argumentation? b. What norms and routines were in place to support the students’ participation in argumentation? c. What was the student’s argument?

Clip 2 The class is asked if they agree or disagree. The student looks to support from her partner.

Questions for Clip 2 Guiding Questions a. What norms and routines were in place to support the students’ participation in argumentation? b. What is the role of the teacher? c. What do you think students learned as a result of this exchange, or would learn as a result of exchanges like this?

Establishing Norms and Routines to Support Argumentation

Sharing Tools/Supports Types of tasks that support argumentation Modifications of tasks ◦ Show your work vs. Defend Refer to task repository ◦ Argumentation doesn’t need to be something new Graphic organizers It’s not ‘one more thing.’ It’s making what you do better.

Turn and Talk 3 things you discovered about argumentation. 2 things you might do in your classroom or professional work. 1 question you still have.

? Questions ?

Sarah Brown Madelyn Williams Colonnese Jillian Cavanna Megan Staples This work was supported by a Math-Science Partnership Grant from the CT State Department of Education. Bridging Practices among Connecticut Mathematics Educators (BPCME) was a collaborative project among UConn, Manchester Public Schools, Mansfield Public Schools, and Hartford Public Schools.