Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014."— Presentation transcript:

1 Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014

2 A Mathematical Argument It is… – A sequence of statements and reasons given with the aim of demonstrating that a claim is true or false It is not… – (Solely) an explanation of what you did (steps) – A recounting of your problem solving process – Explaining why you personally think it’s true for reasons that are not necessarily mathematical (e.g., popular consensus; external authority, etc. It’s true because my John said it, and he’s always always right.)

3 Point of Clarification What’s 7 + 11? (a) 7 + 11 is 18 because 7 + 1 is 8 and 8 plus10 is 18. This is more retelling steps. (b) 7 + 11 is 18 because 11 is 10 plus 1. I added the 1 onto the 7, to get 8, and then I did 10 plus 8 instead. This is a mathematical argument. It is given to support the claim that 7 + 11 is 18.

4 Argumentation Students offer a mathematical reason for why their method is correct Students offer a logical argument to show how they know that their result is correct Student work : When talking about calculations such as: “I multiplied the cost of one package by 7 because that’s how many packages are needed for 14 days.”

5 Point of Clarification Having students generate arguments can happen every day in your class! I would argue it should ha ha ha What can you make an argument for? Any well formulated claim about something in math that could be determined true or false – no matter how bit or small.

6 Point of Clarification “Arguments in math” – need a claim, need evidence, need to know how the evidence shows the claim true (or false). “Arguments in the courtroom” – need a claim (guilty or not?), need evidence, need to know how the evidence shows the claim true (or false) “Arguments among friends” “Debates”

7 Language to help us think about and talk about mathematical arguments

8 Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim Data/Evidence Warrant

9 Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim Data/Evidence Warrant THE ARGUMENT

10 Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim 7 is an odd number Data/Evidence 2 does not divide 7 evenly Warrant Definition of odd/even An even number is a multiple of 2; An odd number is not a multiple of 2.

11 Example 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and 5 + 6 = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and 12 + 13 = 25 and 25 is an odd number. 1240 and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and 1240 +1241 = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Micah ’ s Response

12 Example 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and 5 + 6 = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and 12 + 13 = 25 and 25 is an odd number. 1240 and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and 1240 +1241 = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Claim Micah ’ s Response

13 Example 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and 5 + 6 = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and 12 + 13 = 25 and 25 is an odd number. 1240 and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and 1240 +1241 = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Claim Micah ’ s Response Data/Evidence 3 examples that fit the criterion Warrant Because if it works for 3 of them, it will work for all

14 J: I am a British Citizen B: Prove it J: I was born in Bermuda ?

15 Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim I am a British citizen Data/Evidence I was born in Bermuda Warrant A man born in Bermuda will legally be a British citizen

16 Note: What “counts” as a complete or convincing argument varies by grade (age- appropriateness) and by what is “taken-as- shared” in the class (what is understood without stating it and what needs to be explicitly stated). Regardless of this variation, it should be mathematically sound.

17 Applying Toulmin’s: Ex 1 Which is bigger: 73 – 26 or 76 – 26 – 3? a. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3. I add 3 to 73 and then take 3 away at the end. b. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3. If I add 3 to 73 and then take 3 away at the end, I’ve added nothing overall, so the answer is the same. c. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3 because 73 – 26 is 47 and 76 – 26 – 3 is also 47.

18 Applying Toulmin’s: Ex 1 Which is bigger: 73 – 26 or 76 – 26 – 3? a. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3. I can add 3 to 73 and then take 3 away at the end. b. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3. If I add 3 to 73 and then take 3 away at the end, I’ve added nothing overall, so the answer is the same. c. 73 – 26 is the same as 76 – 26 – 3 because 73 – 26 is 47 and 76 – 26 – 3 is also 47. Data/evidence included; Missing warrant Warrant included too! Warrant – I did the math. Not “explanatory”

19 Applying Toulmin’s: Ex 2 Which is bigger? 4 +(x+3) 2 or π a. Pi, because you can’t figure out what 4+(x+3) 2 is b. 4+(x+3) 2 because 4 is bigger than pi and (x+3) 2 is always positive a. 4+(x+3) 2 because 4 is bigger than pi and (x+3) 2 is always positive, so you’re adding a positive value to 4.

20

21 GROUP PICTURE in Atrium LUNCH


Download ppt "Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google