Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Energy spectrometer cavity BPM Royal Holloway, University of London S. Boogert, G. Boorman University of Cambridge M. Slater, M. Thomson & D. Ward University.

Advertisements

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.

Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.

DDC Signal Processing Applied to Beam Phase & Cavity Signals

Monitoring the length of the bunches in the ESRF storage ring using microwave cavity pick ups.

Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.

Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.

UPC participation in the development of BPMs for the TBL of the CTF3 Yuri Kubyshin WORKSHOP ON THE FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER Gandía, December 3, 2005.

Measuring 3 rd Euler Angle 1 st : Rotate around Z Axis by Phi 2 nd : Rotate around Y' Axis by Theta. 3 rd : Measure angle from X' axis to the Decay Particle.

Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.

High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,

1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.

1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.

BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,

Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.

FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.

WP9 : Cavity BPM spectrometry Royal Holloway S. Boogert & G. Boorman University College London D. Attree, A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu & M. Wing Cambridge University.

NanoBPM Signals Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004 Toyoko Orimoto Yury Kolomensky Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory & University.

Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.

#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.

C/S-band cavity BPMs A. Aryshev (KEK), S. T. Boogert G. Boorman, F. Cullinan, J. Frisch, A. Heo, Y. Honda, J.Y. Huang, S.J. Hwang, N. Joshi,

#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.

Cavity BPM processing and hardware upgrade plans A. Lyapin, S. Boogert, E. Yamakawa.

1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.

Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.

Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.

Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.

Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,

Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:

IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.

Summary of Booster Dampers Systems Dave McGinnis December 7, 2010.

Results on recent technology developments at ATF - Beam extraction study by a Fast Kicker - N. Terunuma, KEK LER11, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2011/Oct/5.

BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.

FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.

FILTERS. Filter The purpose of a filter is to pass signals of certain frequencies,

Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.

Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.

A Possibility of Constant Energy Extraction at ATF2 A.Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Daresbury Laboratory Warrington UK FONT Meeting.

Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF.

1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.

IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.

Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.

1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.

BPM for FF test (ATF2) Vladimir Vogel KEK 2nd Nano Workshop, KEK, December 12, 2004.

Gustavo Cancelo Analysis of the phase shift error between A and B signals in BPMs BPM project.

ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.

FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.

Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.

Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,

Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam

1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.

1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –

Report and plan of the tilt monitor Daisuke Okamoto Tohoku University.

1 ATF2 Q-BPM Magnet Movers & 1 st Pulse Calibration Progress from May 7-11 J. May, D. McCormick, T.Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH)

LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.

Crab Cavities Failure Mode: Machine Protection Matrix Goals: Identify the most critical failure cases Design mitigation methods Make machine protection.

S-band processing electronics R. Ainsworth (summer student), S. Boogert, G. Boorman (Royal Holloway) A. Lyapine (University College London) Weekly ATF2.

Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.

Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich

Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK

NanoBPM Progress January 12, 2005 Steve Smith.

CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM

> 50 dB ≤ 500 MHz Non-intercepting beam position measurement

Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP

Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date

NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University

SLAC - End Station A ILC testrun – April '06 ...

小型X線源の性能確認実験計画高輝度・RF電子銃研究会広島大学高エネルギー加速器研究機構浦川順治

Presentation transcript:

Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London, ATF team. January 13, 2011

 Data was acquired during the machine operation in multi bunch(train) mode for FONT shift in December o Bunch separation,  t b : 154 ns o Number of bunches, n : 3  Cavity parameters  Only one mover scan was recorded to minimize any disturbance in on going operation. ParameterDipole cavityReference cavity Cavity used for calculationQM13FFREF1 DirectionY IF frequency (GHz) Decay time constant  (ns) System information

Block diagram : Process flow

Signal Processing Raw signal Processed Amplitude Processed Phase Colour convention: Bunch1 Bunch2 Bunch3 Normalization:

IQ : Without bunch subtraction Bunch No  (rad) |  | (rad) Rotation Angle: o BPM is moved along Y axis at 200, 100, 0, 0  m positions respectively. o I & Q are calculated in a similar way as single bunch calibration, without any bunch subtraction. o With change in mover position, I&Q from 1 st bunch moves along a straight line in IQ plane passing through (0,0) o Steps along straight lines in IQ plane from 2 nd and 3 rd bunches shows the behaviour expected from a cavity BPM. o IQ signal from a bunch is polluted by the decayed signal from previous bunches.

IQ : After bunch subtraction Bunch No  (rad) |  | (rad) Rotation Angle: Bunch Subtraction: o i & q signals from BPM and reference cavities are subtracted separately before normalization. o Decayed i & q from previous bunch is subtracted from current bunch. o Subtracted signal is then normalized. o Phase difference between bunches becomes even.

Phase difference between bunches o One of the reason can be the difference in frequency between BPM and reference cavity. It will generate certain phase difference over a period of time. o The difference in frequency is 1.2MHz., the bunch separation of 154ns will generate phase difference of rad, which agrees with observation. o If BPM and reference cavities have different frequency and decay constant, then their effects can be removed by normalizing with following general equation. BPM Reference

 Position scan was recorded for BPM during multi-bunch operation mode.  IQ plots, for each bunch, point towards a single point in plane. That indicates that the system is working as a beam position monitor in multi- bunch mode as well.  Observed difference in phase, between bunches, is in agreement with its theoretical explanation derived till date.Conclusions Future work  More data will be recorded for different BPMs over different position range.  Jump in IQ phase between bunches is being studied.  Results will be scanned over range of parameters, such as the digital filter bandwidth and data extraction sample points.  Ultimate goal is to make BPM system online in multi-bunch mode as well.