The Role of Background O 3 in the NAAQS Review George T. Wolff Air Improvement Resource, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on WestJump model runs Mike Barna May 13, 2013 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Advertisements

Template Source Attribution and Source Sensitivity Modeling Studies with CMAQ and CAMx Prakash Karamchandani 1, Jeremiah Johnson 1, Tejas Shah 1, Jaegun.
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments—Round 2 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY(CMAQ) 1.  FY2013 = $9.8 million for NE  New CMAQ Guidance, November 12, 2013  Purpose of the CMAQ Program is to.
BIOGENIC AEROSOLS AND AIR QUALITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA BOND John Bartzis.
University of Leicester CityZen Contributions
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Smog/Acid Rain R&D Mid-term review October
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Recent Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
The Southeast Michigan Air Quality Study Group (SEMAQS) George Wolff - AIR, Inc. Joan Weidner - SEMCOG Chuck Hersey - SEMCOG.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
OZONE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY Contractor Technical & Business Systems, Inc. Environmental Research Associates.
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015.
1 Results of 2010/2015 Post-CAIR Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling August 2005 OAR/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG.
Hemispheric transport of ozone pollution and the nonlinearities GMI meeting UC Irvine March 17, 2008 Shiliang Wu, Harvard Bryan Duncan, NASA / GSFC Arlene.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Phase II -- Task Source Apportionment Modeling Study Design University.
The Impact of Short-term Climate Variations on Predicted Surface Ozone Concentrations in the Eastern US 2020 and beyond Shao-Hang Chu and W.M. Cox US Environmental.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
How Tribes Use Models Part 1 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
WAQS Source Apportionment Modeling Update Ralph Morris IWDW/WAQS Technical Committee January 12, 2016 Fort Collins, Colorado 1.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Why care about methane Daniel J. Jacob. Global present-day budget of atmospheric methane Wetlands: 160 Fires: 20 Livestock: 110 Rice: 40 Oil/Gas: 70 Coal:
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Modeling Options for Proposed BART Rule Two roles for modeling in proposed BART rule > Does a potential BART-eligible.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
Alternative title slide
Alternative title slide
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
EPA is proposing a new NAAQS standard between 60 – 70 ppb
Contributions from different sources to regional relationship of O3 and CO/CH2O Ye Cheng.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Bryan Duncan, Arlene Fiore, Oliver Wild, Daniel Jacob
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Impacts on CMAQ Peak Ozone Predictions from using Different BEIS Biogenic Emissions Options April 22, 2019.
Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop Report
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

The Role of Background O 3 in the NAAQS Review George T. Wolff Air Improvement Resource, Inc.

History of Background O – 40 ppb based on U.S. measurements in clean air 2007 – All US air is contaminated. Must be modeled by zeroing out NA anthropogenic emissions = Policy Relevant Background =PRB = 15 – 35 ppb 2012 – USB = 20 – 45 ppb – CMAQ with US anthropogenics zeroed out – CAMx with source apportionment

CMAQ and Zeroing Out US Limitations – Not realistic – Alters atmospheric chemistry in non-linear fashion Better Alternative – Run unperturbed base case – Zero out all non US contributions and US biogenic emissions – Difference provides impact of USB

CAMx with Source Apportionment CAMx with APCA (Anthropogenic Precursor Culpability Assessment Tool) – Underestimates impact of USB – Assigns culpability to anthropogenic sources for control strategy development – Does not propagate effect of USB throughout US – Does not track source of “odd oxygen” – Need different tracking tool to determine impact of USB

How APCA Works VOC + NO x → O 3 (biogenic) (US anthropogenic) (US anthropogenic) O 3 + NO → NO 2 + sunlight → NO + O (Canada) (anthro) O + O 2 → O 3 (US anthro)

How APCA Works O 3 + VOC → aldehyde + sunshine → ∙OH (Canada) (US anthro) ∙OH + NO x + VOC →→→ 10 O 3 ( US anthropogenic) (US anthropogenic)

CAMx Need accounting procedure to track the sources of odd oxygen associated with USB across the country to determine impact of USB and ambient ozone

Even though USB estimates are biased low, they are significant

On days with MDA8 > 60 ppb

For All Days