Sampling Decision System Daniel Kurz Department of Statistics, University of Klagenfurt in semiconductor manufacturing using Virtual Metrology Cristina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multistep Virtual Metrology Approaches for Semiconductor Manufacturing Processes Presenter: Simone Pampuri (University of Pavia, Italy) Authors: Simone.
Advertisements

Autonomic Scaling of Cloud Computing Resources
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Rutgers CS440, Fall 2003 Review session. Rutgers CS440, Fall 2003 Topics Final will cover the following topics (after midterm): 1.Uncertainty & introduction.
Bayesian posterior predictive probability - what do interim analyses mean for decision making? Oscar Della Pasqua & Gijs Santen Clinical Pharmacology Modelling.
COLLABORATIVE FILTERING Mustafa Cavdar Neslihan Bulut.
Sample size optimization in BA and BE trials using a Bayesian decision theoretic framework Paul Meyvisch – An Vandebosch BAYES London 13 June 2014.
CUSTOMER NEEDS ELICITATION FOR PRODUCT CUSTOMIZATION Yue Wang Advisor: Prof. Tseng Advanced Manufacturing Institute Hong Kong University of Science and.
0 Pattern Classification All materials in these slides were taken from Pattern Classification (2nd ed) by R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork, John.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
Predictive Automatic Relevance Determination by Expectation Propagation Yuan (Alan) Qi Thomas P. Minka Rosalind W. Picard Zoubin Ghahramani.
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California
Basics of Statistical Estimation. Learning Probabilities: Classical Approach Simplest case: Flipping a thumbtack tails heads True probability  is unknown.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2006 Hypothesis testing.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2005 Hypothesis testing.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 3 Common probability distributions.
Thanks to Nir Friedman, HU
Bayesian Classification with a brief introduction to pattern recognition Modified from slides by Michael L. Raymer, Ph.D.
The Chi-square Statistic. Goodness of fit 0 This test is used to decide whether there is any difference between the observed (experimental) value and.
HMM-BASED PSEUDO-CLEAN SPEECH SYNTHESIS FOR SPLICE ALGORITHM Jun Du, Yu Hu, Li-Rong Dai, Ren-Hua Wang Wen-Yi Chu Department of Computer Science & Information.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Determining Sample Size
WSEAS AIKED, Cambridge, Feature Importance in Bayesian Assessment of Newborn Brain Maturity from EEG Livia Jakaite, Vitaly Schetinin and Carsten.
Confidence Intervals (Chapter 8) Confidence Intervals for numerical data: –Standard deviation known –Standard deviation unknown Confidence Intervals for.
Statistical Decision Theory
August th Computer Olympiad1 Learning Opponent-type Probabilities for PrOM search Jeroen Donkers IKAT Universiteit Maastricht.
West Virginia University Towards Practical Software Reliability Assessment for IV&V Projects B. Cukic, E. Gunel, H. Singh, V. Cortellessa Department of.
Computational Intelligence: Methods and Applications Lecture 12 Bayesian decisions: foundation of learning Włodzisław Duch Dept. of Informatics, UMK Google:
Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Lan Guo Lane.
Randomized Algorithms for Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering
Linear Discriminant Analysis and Its Variations Abu Minhajuddin CSE 8331 Department of Statistical Science Southern Methodist University April 27, 2002.
Statistical Decision Theory Bayes’ theorem: For discrete events For probability density functions.
Chapter 3: Maximum-Likelihood Parameter Estimation l Introduction l Maximum-Likelihood Estimation l Multivariate Case: unknown , known  l Univariate.
Michael Isard and Andrew Blake, IJCV 1998 Presented by Wen Li Department of Computer Science & Engineering Texas A&M University.
Learning to Detect Events with Markov-Modulated Poisson Processes Ihler, Hutchins and Smyth (2007)
Multi-Speaker Modeling with Shared Prior Distributions and Model Structures for Bayesian Speech Synthesis Kei Hashimoto, Yoshihiko Nankaku, and Keiichi.
Bayesian Statistics and Decision Analysis
Ch15: Decision Theory & Bayesian Inference 15.1: INTRO: We are back to some theoretical statistics: 1.Decision Theory –Make decisions in the presence of.
1 A Comparison of Information Management using Imprecise Probabilities and Precise Bayesian Updating of Reliability Estimates Jason Matthew Aughenbaugh,
Bayesian Prior and Posterior Study Guide for ES205 Yu-Chi Ho Jonathan T. Lee Nov. 24, 2000.
- 1 - Overall procedure of validation Calibration Validation Figure 12.4 Validation, calibration, and prediction (Oberkampf and Barone, 2004 ). Model accuracy.
1 Optimizing Decisions over the Long-term in the Presence of Uncertain Response Edward Kambour.
Designing Factorial Experiments with Binary Response Tel-Aviv University Faculty of Exact Sciences Department of Statistics and Operations Research Hovav.
Bayesian Speech Synthesis Framework Integrating Training and Synthesis Processes Kei Hashimoto, Yoshihiko Nankaku, and Keiichi Tokuda Nagoya Institute.
- 1 - Calibration with discrepancy Major references –Calibration lecture is not in the book. –Kennedy, Marc C., and Anthony O'Hagan. "Bayesian calibration.
MPS/MSc in StatisticsAdaptive & Bayesian - Lect 91 Lecture 9 Bayesian approaches for quantitative responses 9.1 Proof-of-concept studies outside oncology.
Sampling considerations within Market Surveillance actions Nikola Tuneski, Ph.D. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Faculty of Mechanical Engineering.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Decision Analysis.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 4 Mathematical Foundations I: Probability Theory (Ch2)
Gaussian Process Networks Nir Friedman and Iftach Nachman UAI-2K.
Parameter Estimation. Statistics Probability specified inferred Steam engine pump “prediction” “estimation”
Pattern Classification All materials in these slides* were taken from Pattern Classification (2nd ed) by R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork, John Wiley.
Rick Walker Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk 1 Evaluation of Out-of-Tolerance Risk in Measuring and Test Equipment Rick Walker Fluke - Hart Scientific.
Introduction It had its early roots in World War II and is flourishing in business and industry with the aid of computer.
Outline Historical note about Bayes’ rule Bayesian updating for probability density functions –Salary offer estimate Coin trials example Reading material:
REC Savannah, Febr. 22, 2006 Title Outlier Detection in Geodetic Applications with respect to Observation Imprecision Ingo Neumann and Hansjörg.
A Collapsed Variational Bayesian Inference Algorithm for Latent Dirichlet Allocation Yee W. Teh, David Newman and Max Welling Published on NIPS 2006 Discussion.
Ch 1. Introduction Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Updated by J.-H. Eom (2 nd round revision) Summarized by K.-I.
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 8 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 8: Chapter 4: Statistical Inference,
Chapter 3: Maximum-Likelihood Parameter Estimation
Probability Theory and Parameter Estimation I
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Special Topics In Scientific Computing
OVERVIEW OF BAYESIAN INFERENCE: PART 1
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 4
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
More Parameter Learning, Multinomial and Continuous Variables
CS639: Data Management for Data Science
Presentation transcript:

Sampling Decision System Daniel Kurz Department of Statistics, University of Klagenfurt in semiconductor manufacturing using Virtual Metrology Cristina De Luca Infineon Technologies Austria Jürgen Pilz Department of Statistics, University of Klagenfurt 8th IEEE International Conference on Automation, Science and Engineering (CASE) 2012 Seoul, South Korea 8/21/2012

Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. Contents Motivation and background ¬ Sampling Design and Virtual Metrology (VM) The Sampling Decision System (SDS)  SDS Foundations ¬ The decision-theoretical control chart model ¬ Handling Virtual Metrology information  SDS Principles ¬ The Expected Value of Measurement Information (EVofMI) ¬ The Two-Stage Sampling Decision Model ¬ The Multivariate SDS  SDS Extensions ¬ Wafer Quality Risk Values ¬ SDS Reliabillity and Bayesian Covariance Updating Experimental Results Conclusion and Outline 8/21/2012Page 2

Motivation Cost-intensive and time-consuming measurement operations ¬ Only a certain part of production can actually be measured ¬ Statical measurement rules Control Chart based Sampling Designs Page 3Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. Virtual Metrology (VM) Skipping of lot/wafer measurements Predictions of real metrology outcomes Sampling Decision System (SDS) Virtual measurement Wafer Sampling Decision 8/21/2012

Modeling a Sampling Decision System Motivation: make use of virtual measurements in order to obtain wafer-fine sampling decisions Wafer measurements are taken in order to control output-quality of some process operation Classical - control chart: (exchangeability assumption) Now: additional (prior) information on by means of VM: Consequences of wrong decisions Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. Decision-theoretical control chart model Page 48/21/2012

The control chart in a decision-theoretical framework Actions: States of nature/wafer: Loss function : Basic questions: ¬ What do we expect to gain from a measurement with respect to a certain decision situation? ¬ Is it worth to take a measurement or is it possible to decide on the status of the wafer just based on obtained VM information? Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved.Page 58/21/2012

The Expected Value of Measurement Information (EVofMI) Obtain optimal decision based on the virtual measurement by means of prior expected loss: Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. virtual measurement IC/OOC prior probabilities prior expected loss prior decision value (prior risk) Page 68/21/2012

The Expected Value of Measurement Information (EVofMI) Obtain optimal action after observing sample mean by means of Bayes decision rule: Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. posterior distribution IC/OOC posterior probabilities posterior expected loss posterior decision value (Bayes risk) Page 7 8/21/2012

The Expected Value of Measurement Information (EVofMI) The Value of Measurement Information: Actually: we have to decide before is available if it is needed or not The EVofMI: Sampling rule using measurement loss factor : Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. marginal (prior predictive) distribution EVofMI Page 88/21/2012

The Two-Stage Sampling Decision Model The decision tree: Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. Backwards induction Sampling rule Page 98/21/2012

Extensions of the Sampling Decision System SDS for multivariate virtual measurements: ¬ Consideration of the status of several wafer sites and abnormal variations ¬ Assessment of IC probabilities with respect to multivariate control ellipsoids ¬ Multivariate generalizations of marginal and posterior distribution for Wafer Quality Risk: ¬ Computation of an expected quality loss exploiting virtual measurements and an inverted normal loss function Wafers At Risk and cumulated decision values (avoiding too long skipping periods) Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved.Page 108/21/2012

VM Reliability and Bayesian Covariance Updating Conjugate Wishart prior distribution for VM precision matrix: Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. initially computed VM covariance matrix Updated VM precision matrix Updated degrees of freedom : Bayesian learning Wishart posterior distribution Page 11 real measurement 8/21/2012

Some experimental results Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. PRODUCER3-A1PRODUCER3-A2 PRODUCER3-B1PRODUCER3-B2 PRODUCER3-C1 Page 12 VM precision Process parameters 8/21/2012

EVofMI Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. PRODUCER3-A1PRODUCER3-A2 PRODUCER3-B1PRODUCER3-B2 PRODUCER3-C1 Page 138/21/2012

The Two-Stage Sampling Decision Model Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. PRODUCER3-A1PRODUCER3-A2 PRODUCER3-B1PRODUCER3-B2 PRODUCER3-C1 Page 148/21/2012

Wafer quality risk Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. PRODUCER3-A1 PRODUCER3-A2 PRODUCER3-B1PRODUCER3-B2 PRODUCER3-C1 Real wafer measurement information Bayesian covariance updating Effect on future decisions Page 158/21/2012

Process drift simulation Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved. Process scenario EVofMI Two-stage sampling decision model Page 168/21/2012

Conclusion and outline SDS evaluates if it is possible to decide on the status of some wafer (process) with respect to the virtual measurement ¬ Stable process phases: skipping of a large number of real wafer measurements ¬ Process abnormalities: can be detected earlier (wafer-fine VM data) real wafer measurements suggested New sampling principle: measure nothing except those wafers/lots that are really needed to be measured SDS performance improves with accuracy of VM system Copyright © Infineon Technologies All rights reserved.Page 178/21/2012

Thank you for listening!