Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation
Advertisements

Classical Relativity Galilean Transformations
Classical Doppler Shift Anyone who has watched auto racing on TV is aware of the Doppler shift. As a race car approaches the camera, the sound of its engine.
Theory of Special Relativity
P1X*Dynamics & Relativity : Newton & Einstein Chris Parkes October 2005 Special Relativity Postulates Time Dilation Length Contraction Lorentz Transformation.
Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Einstein’s.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations
SPECIAL RELATIVITY -Postulates of Special Relativity -Relativity of time –> time dilation -Relativity of length –> length contraction © 2005.
Lorentz Transformation
1 Length contraction Length measured differs from frame to frame – another consequence of relativistic effect Gedankan experiment again!
1 2.1The Need for Ether 2.2The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3Einstein’s Postulates 2.4The Lorentz Transformation 2.5Time Dilation and Length Contraction.
Event P is shown by a small x. At what time (in the primed frame) does P occur? A] at ct’=1 B] at ct’=2 C] at ct’=3 D] at ct’=4.
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
PH 301 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 2. Review Outline  length contraction  Doppler  Lorentz  Consequences of Einstein’s postulates  Constancy of speed.
Life in the fast lane: the kinematics of Star Trek.
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
Time Dilation, Length Contraction and Doppler
Life in the fast lane: the kinematics of Star Trek.
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity
1 PH300 Modern Physics SP11 1/27 Day 5: Questions? Time Dilation Length Contraction Next Week: Spacetime Relativistic Momentum & Energy “I sometimes ask.
Announcements Homework: Supplemental Problems 2 nd Project is due at the final exam which is Tuesday May 5 at 1:30 – 3:30pm. A list of potential projects.
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations defining velocities as: u x = dx/dt, u y = dy/dt, u’ x = dx’/dt’, etc. it is easily shown that: With similar relations.
Module 3Special Relativity1 Module 3 Special Relativity We said in the last module that Scenario 3 is our choice. If so, our first task is to find new.
2.1The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3Einstein’s Postulates 2.4The Lorentz Transformation 2.5Time Dilation and Length Contraction.
Introduction to special relativity
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
Special relativity.
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4. Lorentz transformation 5. Consequences.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition The Twin Paradox Space-time.
Module 4Relativity of Time, Simultaneity & Length1 Module 4 Relativity of Time, Simultaneity and Length As written, the Lorentz transformation equations.
Special Relativity The Failure of Galilean Transformations
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4.Lorentz transformation Einstein’s special.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Education Physics Deparment UNS
Consequences of Lorentz Transformation. Bob’s reference frame: The distance measured by the spacecraft is shorter Sally’s reference frame: Sally Bob.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Physics Lecture 2 1/26/ Andrew Brandt Monday January 26, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Special Relativity 2.Galilean Transformations 3.Time.
Module 6Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light1 Module 6 Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light The term aberration used here means deviation. If a light.
The Theory of Special Relativity. Learning Objectives  Einstein’s two postulates in his theory of special relativity: The principle of relativity. (Same.
Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
Chapter 39 Relativity. A Brief Overview of Modern Physics 20 th Century revolution 1900 Max Planck Basic ideas leading to Quantum theory 1905 Einstein.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. Inertial frame Fig1. Frame S’ moves in the +x direction with the speed v relative to frame S.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Galilean Transformation Do we need Ether? Michelson-Morley Experiment Einstein’s.
Galileo’s Relativity: Text: The laws of mechanics are the same in all inertial reference frames. More general: The laws of mechanics are the same in all.
X’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive.
Lecture 5: PHYS344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
PHYS344 Lecture 6 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
PHYS 342: More info The TA is Meng-Lin Wu: His is His office hour is 10:30am to 12pm on Mondays His office is Physics.
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
Administrative Details: PHYS 344
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
The complete Lorentz Transformations Including the inverse (i
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Lecture 4: PHYS 344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
Classical Physics “Inertial Reference Frame” (Section 5.2):
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity
Newtonian Relativity A reference frame in which Newton’s laws are valid is called an inertial frame Newtonian principle of relativity or Galilean invariance.
Einstein’s Relativity Part 2
M.Sc. Integrated Phsics (Ist Semester) Special Theory of Relativity
RELATIVITY III SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
The Galilean Transformation
Chapter 37 Special Relativity
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
Presentation transcript:

Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with system K’ moving to the right along the x axis. A flashbulb goes off at the origins when t = 0. According to postulate 2, the speed of light will be c in both systems and the wavefronts observed in both systems must be spherical. K,K’

Derivation (con’t) Spherical wavefronts in K: Spherical wavefronts in K’: Note: these are not preserved in the classical transformations with

1) Let x’ = (x – vt) so that x = (x’ + vt’) 2) By Einstein’s first postulate: 3) The wavefront along the x,x’- axis must satisfy: x = ct and x’ = ct’ 4) Thus ct’ = (ct – vt) and ct = (ct’ + vt’) 5) Solving the first one above for t’ and substituting into the second... Derivation (con’t)

Derivation of the Lorentz transformation The simplest linear transformation Principle of relativity Consider expanding light come is spherical, then light travels a distance Divide each equation by c Substitute t from the lower to the upper equation Solve for

Find transformation for the time t’ We had

The complete Lorentz Transformations Including the inverse (i.e v replaced with –v; and primes interchanged)

Remarks 1) If v << c, i.e., β ≈ 0 and ≈ 1, we see these equations reduce to the familiar Galilean transformation. 2) Space and time are now not separated. 3) For non-imaginary transformations, the frame velocity cannot exceed c.

Einstein

2.5: Time Dilation and Length Contraction Time Dilation: Clocks in K’ run slow with respect to stationary clocks in K. Length Contraction: Lengths in K’ are contracted with respect to the same lengths stationary in K. Consequences of the Lorentz Transformation:

Time Dilation To understand time dilation the idea of proper time must be understood: The term proper time,T 0, is the time difference between two events occurring at the same position in a system as measured by a clock at that position. Same location (spark “on” then off”)

Not Proper Time spark “on” then spark “off” Beginning and ending of the event occur at different positions Time Dilation

Frank’s clock is at the same position in system K when the sparkler is lit in (a) and when it goes out in (b). Mary, in the moving system K’, is beside the sparkler at (a). Melinda then moves into the position where and when the sparkler extinguishes at (b). Thus, Melinda, at the new position, measures the time in system K’ when the sparkler goes out in (b). Time Dilation with Mary, Frank, and Melinda

According to Mary and Melinda… Mary and Melinda measure the two times for the sparkler to be lit and to go out in system K’ as times t’ 1 and t’ 2 so that by the Lorentz transformation:  Note here that Frank records x 2 – x 1 = 0 in K with a proper time: T 0 = t 2 – t 1 or with T ’ = t’ 2 - t’ 1

1) T ’ > T 0 or the time measured between two events at different positions is greater than the time between the same events at one position: time dilation. 2) The events do not occur at the same space and time coordinates in the two system 3) System K requires 1 clock and K’ requires 2 clocks. Time Dilation: Moving Clocks Run Slow

Length Contraction To understand length contraction the idea of proper length must be understood: Let an observer in each system K and K’ have a meter stick at rest in their own system such that each measures the same length at rest. The length as measured at rest is called the proper length.

What Frank and Mary see… Each observer lays the stick down along his or her respective x axis, putting the left end at x ℓ (or x’ ℓ ) and the right end at x r (or x’ r ). Thus, in system K, Frank measures his stick to be: L 0 = x r - x ℓ Similarly, in system K’, Mary measures her stick at rest to be: L’ 0 = x’ r – x’ ℓ

What Frank and Mary measure Frank in his rest frame measures the moving length in Mary’s frame moving with velocity. Thus using the Lorentz transformations Frank measures the length of the stick in K’ as: Where both ends of the stick must be measured simultaneously, i.e, t r = t ℓ Here Mary’s proper length is L’ 0 = x’ r – x’ ℓ and Frank’s measured length is L = x r – x ℓ

Frank’s measurement So Frank measures the moving length as L given by but since both Mary and Frank in their respective frames measure L’ 0 = L 0 and L 0 > L, i.e. the moving stick shrinks

A “Gedanken Experiment” to Clarify Length Contraction

2.6: Addition of Velocities Taking differentials of the Lorentz transformation, relative velocities may be calculated:

So that… defining velocities as: u x = dx/dt, u y = dy/dt, u’ x = dx’/dt’, etc. it is easily shown that: With similar relations for u y and u z:

The Lorentz Velocity Transformations In addition to the previous relations, the Lorentz velocity transformations for u’ x, u’ y, and u’ z can be obtained by switching primed and unprimed and changing v to –v:

2.7: Experimental Verification Time Dilation and Muon Decay Figure 2.18: The number of muons detected with speeds near 0.98c is much different (a) on top of a mountain than (b) at sea level, because of the muon’s decay. The experimental result agrees with our time dilation equation.

Figure 2.20: Two airplanes took off (at different times) from Washington, D.C., where the U.S. Naval Observatory is located. The airplanes traveled east and west around Earth as it rotated. Atomic clocks on the airplanes were compared with similar clocks kept at the observatory to show that the moving clocks in the airplanes ran slower. Atomic Clock Measurement