WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Processes ECOSYSTEM DEFINITION
Advertisements

Overview of Alaska Ecosystem Indicators Relative to EAM/EAF Objectives
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
Leonie Robinson ODEMM Project Coordinator ODEMM perspective on MSP Joint project meeting Edinburgh, Sep 2011.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
The Discovery Corridor Concept and its Applicability January 13/14, 2004 workshop St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, N.B.
DEEPFISHMAN Stakeholder workshop Brussels, June 2009 DEEPFISHMAN Stakeholder worskshop Brussels June 2009 Data availability.
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION Summary of MSFD Requirements; EU project management arrangements; Descriptors of most.
DEEPFISHMAN Stock assessment (WP 4) and Biological Reference Points (WP 5) Phil Large.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status Descriptor 7 – Hydrographical Conditions Dr Alejandro Gallego Marine Scotland.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Building the knowledge base for the implementation/ monitoring of biodiversity strategies Breakout group discussion 1.
OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT MARINE ECOSYSTEMS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND OTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENTS Transform Aqorau Scientific Symposium of the Reykjavik.
1 Fisheries sustainability – CFP directions, MSFD descriptors and CSI Poul Degnbol Head of ICES advisory programme / ETC/W Marine and Coastal EEA/EIONET.
MSFD - POMS Consultation Descriptor 1 – Biodiversity Descriptor 4 – Food Webs Descriptor 6 – Sea-floor integrity Simon Greenstreet, Marine Scotland Science.
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
2nd Meeting of the MariFish Bycatch and Discards Scientific Committee Madrid, 5-6th October 2009 Work Package 7: Collaborative Research Programmes Thematic.
Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
CHALLENGES TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. 1.Status & Trends : selected indicators Reported landings State of stocks Fleet size EmploymentFoodTrade.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
Monitoring marine litter, a part of the joint Norwegian/Russian ecosystem survey in the Barents Sea Bjørn Einar Grøsvik 1, Elena Eriksen 1, Tatiana Prokhorova.
Hans Frost Hans Lassen Søren Anker Pedersen EEA 6 March EURECA’s ‘Fish Behind the Net’ (FBtN) – Spotmeter.
1 The IMAGE project I ndicators for fisheries MA naGement in E urope A specific targeted research project under the European Commission 6 th framework.
Nautilus (Dr M. Norman, Museum Victoria) Butterfly fish & Yellowback Fusiliners (R.Thorn) Soft coral and diver (M. Ball) Tiger Anemone (L. Wiseman) Whale.
Mediterranean regional case study – WP 7 Dr Costas Papaconstantinou Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Institute for Marine Biological Resources GSRT.
The management of small pelagics. Comprise the 1/3 of the total world landings Comprise more than 50% of the total Mediterranean landings, while Two species,
DEEPFISHMAN Stakeholder workshop Brussels, June 2009 DEEPFISHMAN Stakeholder worskshop Brussels June 2009
Comparison between ECAP indicators and what EMODnet can offer in the Mediterranean Sea Intro Oostende, Belgium, 21st September 2015 Giordano Giorgi*, in.
Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.
WP220 – Marine ecosystems and fisheries Tony Beeching Cefas.
Science requirements for implementing EBM Rob Stephenson DFO, St. Andrews Biological Station.
Ocean Biodiversity Informatics (OBI) 2004 Marine Biodiversity Data – clearing house, data center or what? Adi Kellermann (presented by Julie Gillin) International.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Structure and Function of Marine Ecosystems Steven Murawski Ph.D. Director, Office of Science & Technology National Marine Fisheries Service  Challenges.
Projected changes to coastal fisheries. Based on......
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
26 February 2014 Views to practical support on management of HELCOM biodiversity data by an EU Service contract Hermanni Kaartokallio (SYKE) EEA workshop.
Fishing and Habitat Integrity Leonie Dransfeld D3+ workshop April 2014.
EMODnet Biology Kick-off Meeting – VLIZ, Oostende September 2013 EMODnet Biology Work Package 2 Mark Costello & Dan Lear
BalticBOOST Theme 3 WS, Copenhagen, 2-3 June 2016
Pascal Lorance & Verena Trenkel, Ifremer, France
Deltares, Delft, Netherland
DEEPFISHMAN Kick-off meeting Nantes May 2009.
EC FP7 - Cooperation Theme 6: Environment (incl. climate change)
Ecosystem-Based Management for the Northeast US Continental Shelf
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
EU Biodiversity Strategy in context
Marine Litter Workshop, Feb 23th, Athens
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
European Commission DG Environment
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
D1 Species Conclusions.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Conclusions Group 3 Parallel sessions 2 and 3
Morning session: discussion on spatial scales
Presentation to the 2nd MSFD Descriptor 3+ Meeting
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
MEDCIS Workshops - Litter, 23rd February 2018, Athens
1.
OSPAR biodiversity assessments Intermediate Assessment 2017
Leonie Dransfeld MI Ireland
Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 3+
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
By-catch work at ICES Lara Salvany,
Presentation transcript:

WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates - Identification of indicators

WP6 contributors/objectives Ifremer6 Cefas5 Imperial1 IPIMAR4 MI3 HCMR5 IEO1 MRI7 Participants + Case studies - review impacts - explore trends (landings/catch/surveys) - options for invertebrates biodiversity - selection of biodiversity indicators - spatial scale: Case study Objectives

WP6 deliverables D6.1 Relevance of commercial catch data (18) D6.2 Biodiversity indicators: trends, monitoring evaluation of information (24) D6.3 Patterns of distributions from survey (from some CSs)

Links with Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Descriptors of MSFD: –1 - Biological diversity is maintained. [...] quality and occurrence of habitats [...] distribution and abundance of species are in line with [...] geographic and climatic conditions –4 - Marine food web [...] normal abundance and diversity [...] –6 - Sea-floor integrity [...] structure and functions [...] safeguarded [...] benthic ecosystems [...] not adversely affected –10 - [...] marine litter do not cause harm

Example: descriptor marine litter –10 - [...] marine litter do not cause harm

MSFD descriptors addresed in WP6 1: biological diversity (species diversity metrics) 4: food web, not addressed (*) 6: sea floor: can be addressed with VMS (availability?) – proportion of the seafloor impacted? – use of EU-CoralFISH results 10: marine litter: no data. –Define protocol for on-board observations in the long term monitoring strategy ? part of task 7.3: Prototype short- and long-term management and monitoring framework for deep-water fisheries and stocks in the NE Atlantic (*) preys mainly mesopelagic with little data

List of indicators Taxonomic distinctness, other diversity metrics from surveys Simple indicators (landings/catch/survey) : –S (richness) –proportion of large species, small species, chondrichthyans, vulnerable species (e.g. from observer data), etc –Discard rate –Number of discarded species Invertebrates : –Is it a matter of monitoring diversity or conservation of VMEs ? –Relevant spatial scale –Footprint approach: distribution of fishing effort frozen to current (VMS) ? Catch: on-board observations

Links with other WPs WP5: BRPs and HCRs – Fish diversity and invertebrates in HCRs Include in HCRs ? Use as constraint to choose HCRs with lesser diversity impact ?.... WP7: Managements strategies –If footprint approach for invertebrates/VMEs, how to integrate in management strategies ? –How to account for fish species diversity in MS ? –...