Emily H. van Zee Corinne Manogue National Science Foundation DUE-9653250, 0231194 DUE-0088901, 0231032.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 3 LITERACY GUIDED WRITING Autumn 2007.
Advertisements

Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary 1 What’s the Focus? An Introduction to Algebraic Reasoning Ruth Beatty and Cathy Bruce 1.
Flipping the Classroom. Presenter Information Mary K Abkemeier Fontbonne University Chair, Department of Math and CS
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Navigating the Language of Math: Using Active Reading Strategies
Developing Programs to Reach Bilingual Audiences.
Roslyn Middle School Math Department Back to School Night
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Literacy in Math Reading and Writing to Learn Basics.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Reflective practice Session 4 – Working together.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Strategies for Efficient Scoring Jeanne Stone, UC Irvine PACT Conference October 22, 2009.
FROM CONCRETE TO ABSTRACT Basic Skills Analysis Hypothesis Proof Elementary Matrices and Geometrical Transformations for Linear Algebra Helena Mirtova.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
PROBLEM SOLVING VIA FUNCTIONS TASKS Day 2. REFLECTING ON FUNCTIONAL THINKING  Go to mscsummercourses2013.wikispaces.com and then to the Problem Solving.
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT LESSONS Region 5 Mathematics Network Conference September 16, 2013.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Welcome to the 2010 OMSP Summer Experience!. Who is in the Room? Bremerton Cape Flattery Chimacum North Mason Port Angeles Quillayute Valley Our Lady.
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 13, 2009 Learning to.
PVNC MATH 3 PROJECT DIGGING DEEPER WITH DIFFERENTIATION Session 2.
Descriptions of Pedagogical Strategies Faculty may not know how to implement unusual pedagogical strategies. The wiki provides an easy way both to describe.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
7/19/2010http://physics.oregonstate.edu/portfolioswiki Teaching Students to “Think Like a Physicist” Paradigms in Physics Corinne Manogue
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
The “Sandwich” Approach to Professional Development: Knowledge Creation Though Lesson Study Rebecca Perry, Catherine Lewis, Aki Murata, Lesson Study Group.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
Using a Model Teaching Activity to Help Teachers Learn to Use Comparison in Algebra Kristie J. Newton, Temple University Jon R. Star, Nataliia Perova Harvard.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Welcome Mentor Certification Training Year Two Session F Sign in & wear your nametag. Greet each other Grab a bite to eat Sit anywhere you want Tell the.
6 th G R A D E © Prepared by the LAUSD Secondary Math Unit, 2008 Welcome.
Application of UDL ‘way of thinking’ UDL-PCG Webinar 5 May 6, 2013.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
PARADIGMS IN PHYSICS REVISING THE UPPER-DIVISION CURRICULUM The Paradigms in Physics Project at Oregon State University has reformed the entire upper-division.
Paradigms in Physics Name the Experiment Corinne A. Manogue David Roundy Emily van Zee.
Learning type: Acquisition
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Why did the water stick together during the water Olympic lab?
Math Curriculum “The philosophy of the Core Plus Mathematics Program is that students are working in groups to identify, investigate, and explore the.
Elementary Engineers: Using Stories to Engage in the Design Process
Review of TTLP Insert comments for another assigned group within their Google doc (be certain to include your name) Read the comments made on your TTLP.
10 Reasons and Ways to Video Record Your Teaching
The Learner Centered Classroom
More information than you ever thought you wanted to know!
Paradigms 2.0: Supporting Collaborative Departmental Change
Numeracy Skills Framework
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Introducing Mathematics
Welcome to Day Five.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Welcome to Day Three.
Professional Learning
Engineering Mathematics-I Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Prompt: Describe examples of transformations encountered in real life
RAYAT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA’S S.M.JOSHI COLLEGE HADAPSAR, PUNE
Welcome to Day Seven.
Presentation transcript:

Emily H. van Zee Corinne Manogue National Science Foundation DUE , DUE , DUE , Oregon State University Department of Physics Department of Science and Mathematics College of Science Compare and Contrast Wrap-Up Discussion #1 Typical Beginning of Class Sessions Students pick up small whiteboards as they enter & sit at tables in small groups Instructor - Uses props to visually represent concept or process -Welcomes student questions and comments - Asks small whiteboard questions Pedagogical Strategies Video record class sessions Discuss priorities with instructor Transcribe high priority segment Watch video of segment together Record video interpretation session Type instructor’s comments into transcript Ask questions to prompt reflection as needed Preparation Articulate reasons for selection Summarize physics context Long version: - Provide “blow-by-blow” account - Interweave instructor comments Short version: - Narrow long version to high priority topics with enough context to be comprehensible Construction Small Group Collaborations Compare and Contrast Wrap-Up Discussion #2 Issues. Looking for Patterns Resources on Wiki A wiki documents our reforms for ourselves and others through links on the National Science Digital library. Information includes instructor’s guides for individual activities, rational and tips for different strategies, links to classroom video, and detailed narratives of specific examples. Geometric Interpretation of Transforming Vectors Documenting and Interpreting Ways to Engage Students in ‘Thinking Like a Physicist’ What does it mean to engage students in ‘thinking like a physicist’? How can instructors learn how to do this? How can instructors who are attempting to do this share their successes and challenges with others? Narrative Interpretations Provide Examples of Discussions Document - What was said by students and instructor -How instructor thinks about Structuring discussions Interpreting what students say Forming questions and comments in response Small group activity: Use given matrix to transform common set of given vectors; Represent transformed vectors graphically Wrap-up Discussion: Students examine similarities and differences in what the different groups did and found Small groups work together on large whiteboards at their tables and/or whiteboards on the walls Instructor & TA move from group to group - Assist as needed - Monitor and shape progress - Become aware of successes and challenges Wrap-Up Discussions Instructor guides students in thinking together about challenging aspects of the topic they have just explored through the small group activity Main idea emerges from the wrap-up discussion rather than the activity itself Students experience what it is like to deduce a result from looking at many examples – the experience that many professional theoreticians have Students discuss the determinant and what it means geometrically Students come to realize that an eigenvector is a vector whose direction is not changed when multiplied by a vector Algebraic Interpretation of Transforming Vectors Small group activity: Solve for eigen- vectors and eigenvalues of particular matrices Wrap-up Discussion: Students examine similarities and differences in what the different groups did and found Students gain a deeper understanding of the relations between geometric and algebraic representations of eigenvectors Students experience nuances in solving set of linear algebra problems, particularly those involving degeneracy Prompting Expectations I: What do you expect to happen along the z axis?” S: “Nothing.” I: “Nothing, you expect the z axis to be unchanged” (S: (eigenvector) I: therefore you expect it to be an eigenvector, yes!”