Mission The Center for Educational Leadership (CEL) is dedicated to eliminating the achievement gap that continues to divide our nation’s children along.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Summer Institute 2014 Technology Integration Matrix Laurie Kirkland.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Elementary School Counselor
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
The Road to Powerful Instructional Practice Through the 5D+™ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Alaska Staff Development Network April 10, 2013 Copyright © 2013.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
LVSN+ September Welcome Back! Name, current leadership role, district. Something you would like to share about your summer or the start of the.
EVIDENCE WITH 5D+ FOR FITNESS/HEALTH, PERFORMING ARTS, CTE AND SPECIAL EDUCATION STACEY KRUMSICK, ICFFS DEBBIE LINDGREN & MARTY NEYMAN-HEALTH & FITNESS.
Ohhhhh, Christopher Robin, I am not the right one for this job... The House on Pooh Corner, A.A. Milne.
Council of the Great City Schools Annual Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Developing and Measuring Principals’ Ability to Analyze Instruction and Lead.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
December 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.
An Administrator Evaluation System Curriculum Leaders Institute Cohort 5 Day 8.
Developing the Leadership Expertise to Improve Instruction: A Two-part Equation: Improvement of self and others.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
OPEN HOUSE, SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 Newfane Elementary School.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Resources to Support Teachers NAME LOCATION DATE.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics 8/18/14.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
October 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
Enumclaw High School August 30, 31 and September 1, 2011.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Fall River Public Schools Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support ELL Initiatives & RETELL.
Administrators Academy August 15, College Prepared and Career Ready.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
 Effective monitoring of adult actions – teaching and leadership – strongly linked to gains in student achievement  “Implementation gap” between intention.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Broward Cadre Directors: Learning Through Practice.
Learning Management System
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Scaling up EBPs and HLPs
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
NJCU College of Education
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Cooperating Teacher Training
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Effective After-School Programs Presented by
Presentation transcript:

Mission The Center for Educational Leadership (CEL) is dedicated to eliminating the achievement gap that continues to divide our nation’s children along the lines of race, class, language and disability.

CEL Foundational Ideas Applied to Instructional Frameworks If students are not learning, they are not being afforded powerful learning opportunities. Teaching is a highly complex and sophisticated endeavor. Practice of sophisticated endeavors only improves when it is open for public scrutiny. Improving practice in a culture of public scrutiny requires reciprocal accountability. Reciprocal accountability implies a particular kind of leadership to improve teaching and learning. Leaders cannot lead what they don’t know. Foundational Ideas – 5 min debrief as a whole group Important ideas to touch on: If students are not learning… research is clear about the role of instruction and teaching in student learning. Teaching is a highly complex … teachers don’t become teachers because they couldn’t become doctors and lawyers and couldn’t do anything else. Teaching is a complex endeavor: an art and a science. Practice of sophisticated endeavors … unlike most professions education is characterized by privacy – i.e. the day after a college or professional sports game, the medical profession Improving practice …if we are going to ask our teachers to be accountable for what students are learning, we must be accountable for what teachers are learning Reciprocal accountability implies ... Instructional leadership to build the capacity of teachers to continuously reflect on and improve their practice has its own skill set. Leaders cannot lead … this addresses the anatomy of teaching and learning. We have learned much about this in the last 20 years and continue to learn how to build teacher’s capacity. These ideas also reflect and underscore the importance of an instructional framework - without a framework... how does a school, district and community come to agree and implement what powerful learning opportunities look and sound like? how does a teacher or principal articulate their strong instructional practices in a way that others can understand and emulate?

An Instructional Framework is: a set of descriptions of teaching behaviors. linked to improved student learning. based on research and the work of practitioners. P10P1000026.JPG0002P1000026.JPP1000026.JPGG P 3 min What is an instructional framework? Research is clear about the importance of the teacher in student achievement. As a result, we need a common language that describes: what powerful instruction looks and sounds like in the classroom the focus of the collaboration and planning that goes into bringing powerful learning to fruition Encourages teacher’s to continually improve their instructional practice It is the beginning of professional standards for our work – other professions have standards, if we are a profession we need them too

The 5D instructional framework as the foundation and support for: Observation and analysis of teaching and learning. Evidence-based conversations. Collaborative, inquiry stance. Implementing an evaluation system that is truly about teachers’ growth requires big shifts in what teachers and leaders know and what they do as well as big shifts in our educational culture. TEACHER EVAL AN EXTENSION OF OUR WORK Our work ties nicely with the shift in teacher evaluation that puts new emphasis on the role of observation, evidence and co-inquiry with teachers. The work of teacher evaluation is an extension of CEL’s work over the last decade. We know how complex and sophisticated high quality teaching really is and so we work educators to support their observation and analysis of teaching and learning, helping educators understand what good teaching looks like. We have worked with leaders to hone their ability to have evidence-based conversations about their classroom observation—specific AND generalizable We have worked with leaders on how to support teachers’ growth and how to work collaboratively with teachers so that capacity building for instructional improvement is a shared process among teachers and administrators.

The 5D instructional framework as a tool: A “lens” for classroom observations. A guide for teachers. A reference during lesson planning and staff meetings about instructional practices. The entry point into the teacher evaluation rubric.

The 5 Dimensions of Teaching and Learning Instructional Framework Purpose Student Engagement Curriculum & Pedagogy Assessment for Student Learning Classroom Environment & Culture 6

The 5D Instructional Framework The format: Dimension Subdimension The Vision Guiding Questions 7

The 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Inquiry-based growth model, not a check list Joins instructional leaders and teachers in co-learning Shared and common vision of high quality teaching Accessible and actionable Classroom observations, teacher and student artifacts, continuous conversation Equity is embedded in each dimension 1 min Philosophy behind the work… The 5 D isn’t a checklist. Good teaching is too complex to be reduced to a single set of behaviors that are constantly observable. Leaders are learners - principals and teachers model learning for students by using an inquiry process. The framework was created for leaders to lead around instructional practice, using growth and inquiry It is both accessible and actionable for teachers and principals – worked hard to get the framework onto 1 page using language The guiding questions support inquiry and growth The “snapshot” of teacher practice is turned into a movie as a result of the data that is brought in to the process. Guided by a Theory of Action: Improvement of the instructional core is the key variable in student achievement. Collaborative adult learning is the vehicle. This is done with and though people. The work is about the practice, not the person This is a leadership and system responsibility and imperative. (we are responsible and accountable to each other and for student achievement)  

Preparing for 5D+ Evaluation Training Read Chapters 1-3 of Leading for Instructional Improvement by Fink and Markholt. Consider how the work in your district reflects the research described in these chapters.