Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Laurence Carson, University of Edinburgh on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond EW 2014 Constraining the CKM Angle γ at LHCb.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
CP Violation Reach at Very High Luminosity B Factories Abi Soffer Snowmass 2001 Outline: Ambiguities B  DK B  D*     etc. B  D*  a 0   etc. (“designer.
A. BondarModel-independent φ 3 measurement August 6, 2007Charm 2007, Cornell University1/15 γ/φ 3 model-independent Dalitz analysis (Dalitz+CP tagged Dalitz.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
1/4/2008 LHCb Tuesday Meeting 1 Global fits to γ and the impact of CLEO-c Jim Libby and Guy Wilkinson (University of Oxford)
Aug 6, Charm γ/φ 3 Impact from CLEO-c Using CP-Tagged D→K S,L ππ Decays Eric White - University of Illinois Qing He - University of Rochester for.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
7th February Determination of γ from B ± →DK ± : Input from CLEOc Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
Laurence Carson, Beauty Charmless Hadronic B Decays at LHCb Laurence Carson, University of Glasgow (on behalf of the LHCb collaboration) 12 th International.
7/4/08 Flavour physics at CLEO-c - Jim Libby 1 Jim Libby (University of Oxford) On behalf of the CLEO-c collaboration  Introduction to CLEO-c  Measurements.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Strong Phase Measurements – Towards g at CLEO-c Andrew Powell (University of Oxford) On behalf of the CLEO-c collaboration D measurements relevant to determining.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
LHCb status of CKM  from tree-level decays Stefania Ricciardi, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Stefania Ricciardi,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Fernando Martínez-Vidal, On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Measurements of the CKM angle  at BaBar.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
30th October 2007 LHCb Tuesday Meeting 1 Model independent determination of γ from B ± →D(K 0 S π + π − )K ± Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
LHCb  Extraction with B s →D s K and B d →D (*)  Guy Wilkinson University of Oxford March 17,2005 Physics Motivation and Observables Experimental Essentials.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Hadronic B→DX Decays at LHCb and CDF Laurence Carson, Imperial College on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CIPANP 2012, St. Petersburg,FL.
Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Prospects for at LHCb William Reece Imperial College London Physics at the LHC, 3 rd October 2008.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
WGV Summary g from B to charm decays
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Status of mixing and CP-violation measurements at LHCb
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
ВД в эксперименте по измерению масс
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
f3 measurements by Belle
Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity
B DK strategies in LHCb (part II)
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Presentation transcript:

Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb2/20 Introduction  plays a unique role in flavour physics —Can be measured via both tree and loop processes Trees —Benchmark Standard Model reference point Loops —Sensitive to New Physics Very impressive measurements from the B factories To fully test SM and unitarity need —   ~ few % precision —measurements in B , B 0 and B s systems K.Trabelsi CKM 2008 V.Sordini CKM 2008

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb3/20 LHCb High statistics —  bb ~ 500  b at 14 TeV — ℒ ~ 2 x cm -2 s -1 —10 12 bb per 2 fb -1 (1 year) —All B species (B 0, B s, B c,  b …) Excellent tracking system —VELO and tracking detectors —Mass resolution,  B(D) ~15 (7) MeV —B vertex resolution,  z  ~ 200  m —Proper time resolution,    ~ 40 fs Excellent particle identification —2 RICH detectors —  separation over p ~2  100 GeV Trigger —High p T hadron trigger at L0 VELO First real tracks RICH HPDs

 with trees B  DK Strategies Time integrated analyses based on: “ADS”: Atwood, Dunietz, Soni; Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3257; Phys Rev. D63 (2001) “GLW”: Gronau, London, Wyler; Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 483; Phys. Lett. B265 (1991)172. “Dalitz” or “GGSZ”: Giri, Grossman, Soffer, Zupan, Phys. Rev. D (2003)

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb5/20 B  DK Strategies Measure  through interference in decays Provided and decay to common final state Common parameters CKM angle  Amplitude ratio, r B Strong phase difference,  B colour-suppressed colour-allowed colour-suppressed

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb6/20 B   D(hh)K  (ADS+GLW) 6 rates, 5 parameters   r B = 0.10  B = 130 o (PDG) D decay parameters: r  = (PDG)   = -158 o (ADS formalism requires -180 o phase shift w.r.t published result) Constraints from CLEO-c PRL 100(2008) LHCb LHCb ModeSig. Yield*B/S B +  D   (fav.) 28k0.6 B +  D   (sup.) B +  D(   3k1.2 B +  D(  )K  1k3.6   ( o )   ( o ) ICHEP 2008 Sensitivity 2 fb -1 *All signal yields presented are for 2 fb -1

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb7/20 B 0  D(hh)K *0 (ADS+GLW) 6 rates, 5 parameters   r B 0 = 0.40  B 0 (scan) D decay parameters: r  = (PDG)   = -158 o (ADS formalism requires -180 o phase shift w.r.t published result) Constraints from CLEO-c PRL 100(2008) LHCb LHCb ModeSig. YieldB/S B 0  D(   (fav.) 3.4k[0.4,2.0] B 0  D(   (sup.) O(500)[2.0,13.0] B 0  D(   O(500)[0,0.4] B 0  D(   O(100)[0,14.0]  B 0 ( o )   ( o ) ICHEP 2008 Sensitivity 2 fb -1 68% 95%

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb8/20 B   D   (ADS) Br(D  K3  ) = 8.1% c.f. Br(D  K  )=3.89% 4 rates Multi-body final state —Integrate over ALL phase space —“Coherence factor” R  r  = (PDG) Constraints ModeSig. YieldB/S B +  D     31k0.7 B +  D     LHCb LHCb R K3π  K3π ( o ) Prelim: arXiv: CLEO-c Atwood and Soni, PRD (2003) Sensitivity 2 fb -1

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb9/20 B   D  s       (“Dalitz”)  s     Dalitz plots contain a CP-violating contribution from the B  and B  interference which is sensitive to . Two analysis methods: —Unbinned fit based on amplitude model —Model independent binned fit using results from  (3770) on D decays Giri et. al., PRD 68 (2003) ; Bondar and Poluektov, EPJ C47 (2006) 347; hep-ph/ ;arXiv: LHCb 2 fb -1

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb10/20 B   D  s       (“Dalitz”) Signal yield ~ 5k (total) per year B   D  s        background suppressed with max. momentum cut (good for RICH pid) Dominant physics background B  D  s      X plus random “  ” ~ 16% prob. of picking up “  ” from underlying event or other B. LHCb Background typeB/S B   D  s       < (90% c.l.) B  D*X+K < 0.05 (90% c.l.) DK-signal< 0.09 (90% c.l.) DK-random 0.35  0.03 Loose K pid 2 fb -1

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb11/20 B   D  s       (“Dalitz”) Amplitude Fit: Generate and fit events assuming isobar model. —Models of BaBar [PRL 95 (2005) ] and Belle [hep-ex/ ] give consistent results. —Total error will include model uncertainty, currently ~ 7 o [BaBar PRD 78 (2008) ] Binned Fit: Removes model dependence by relating bins of Dalitz plot to experimental observables —Slight degradation in statistical precision —Residual error on  from CLEO-c statistics ~1-2 o [Asner, ICHEP 08] (o)(o) rBrB (o)(o) Amp. Fit Binned Fit LHCb LHCb Sensitivity 2 fb -1 Amplitude fit, model error 7 o Binned fit, CLEO-c error 2 o Fit assumes pure combinatorial background same level as DK-random

 with trees Time Dependent B  Dh  Strategies B s  D s K: Aleskan, Dunietz and Kayser, Z. Phys. C54 (1992) 653. B 0  D  and B s  D s K “Uspin Approach”: Fleischer, Nuc. Phys. B671 (2003) 459.

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb13/20 BsDsBsDs Measure  s from interference between mixing and decay amplitudes. Large interference effects  s input from B s  J/  (   s ~ 0.03 mrad for 2 fb -1 see A.Satta talk) Include B s  D s  (20x Br) to determine  m s and tagging dilution Simultaneous fit to B s  D s  and B s  D s  decay time distributions (tagged and untagged) B s →D s - K + LHCb LHCb ModeSig. yieldB/S B s  D s  6.2k0.7 B s  D s  140k0.2 Sensitivity2 fb fb -1        m s (ps -1 ) Input parameters:  ,  m s = 17.5 ps -1

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb14/20 B 0  D  Measure  d analogous to B s  D s   d input from B 0  J/  s  (   d = 0.02 mrad for 2 fb -1 see ? talk) Problems —Interference small —8 fold ambiguity (  small) Potential solutions —“Conventional approach”: compare with other channels e.g. B 0  D   —“Uspin approach”: B 0  D  and B s  D s  LHCb LHCb ModeSig. yieldB/S B s  D s  6.2k0.7 B  D  1340k0.22 Sensitivity2 fb fb -1      for        for   Input :   Uspin approach shows very promising results.  30% Uspin breaking    2 fb -1 (  stat.  30% Upsin breaking)

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb15/20  with trees : Global Sensitivity Perform global fit to B  DK with common parameters. Include results from B 0 and B s time dependent analyses.  B  ( o )   for 0.5 fb -1 ( o )   for 2 fb -1 ( o )   for 10 fb -1 ( o ) LHCb Input measurements: B   D 0 K  D 0   (LHCb ) D 0  (LHCb ) D 0  s   (LHCb ) B 0  D 0   D 0  (LHCb ) Time dependent measurements: B 0  D  (LHCb ) B s  D s  (LHCb ) Parameters (input value): B   D 0 K   (60 o ) r B – ratio of magnitude of diagrams (0.1)  B – strong phase difference (130  ) B 0  D 0   analogues: r B 0 (0.4),  B 0 (scan) D  decay parameters for ,  : r , r  well known (PDG)   (  158    (144 o ) R  – coherence factor Constrained by CLEO-c “Conventional” approach used for B 0  D  (     with 2 fb -1 ) to avoid large correlations with B s  D s K.

 with loops New physics in B  hh and B  hhh modes B 0   and B s  : “Uspin Approach”, Fleischer, Phys. Lett B458 (1999) 306. B          and B    s      : “Dalitz Approach”, Bediaga, Guerrer and Miranda, Phys Rev D (2007).

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb17/20 B 0   and B s   Measure  from interference between mixing and tree and penguin decay diagrams Demonstrates excellence of RICH pid LHCb ModeSig. yield (untagged) B/S (incl. bb) B 0   36k0.5 B s   36k0.15 B 0   140k< 0.06 B s   10k1.9 W  hypothesis m hh (GeV/c 2 )  hypothesis m hh (GeV/c 2 )

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb18/20 B 0   and B s   Fit CP asymmetries of B 0  and B s  events —4 observables: Parameters —  —penguin to tree amplitude ratio d  e    d  e   —Input  d and  s Weak Uspin constraint —d   d   20%,     indep. Measures  and tests Uspin symmetry Sensitivity2 fb fb -1   ( o ) 105  d     ( o ) 95   ( o ) 178 LHCb fb -1 B s   (ps)

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb19/20 B         and B 0   s     Measure  from a Dalitz analysis of B   K      and B 0  K s     decays —K* resonance (dominant contributions) Extract penguin contribution from B   K      —Use Dalitz anistropy to measure CP asymmetry including phase differences Dalitz analysis of B 0 / B 0  K s     —Untagged analysis possible since B 0 and B 0 interference regions do not overlap Promising results:   ~5 o with 2 fb -1 G.Guerrer CKM 2008 ModeSig. yieldB/S B +  K  494k0.3 B 0   s  90kt.b.d. W I II III IV m 2  m 2  I CP III no-CP

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb20/20 Summary LHCb offers exciting prospects for a precision measurement of   with trees —Standard Model benchmark —External input from CLEO-c of upmost importance —A combined sensitivity of   ~2-3 o is expected with 10 fb -1 of data —Many channels still to be investigated D    D  s  D  s  D (   (   s  D s (     etc  with loops —Sensitive to New Physics —B  hh analysis can measure  (   ~ 5 o with 10 fb -1 ) and test Upsin symmetry —B  hhh very promising first studies —Other channels to investigate: B d  , B s   B s  K    etc First challenge: reconstruct hadronic final states with real data….. coming soon

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb21/20 Backup Slides

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb22/20 B Tagging

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb23/20  with trees : Global Sensitivity Weight (in %) of each contributing analysis with 2 fb -1 for two values of  B 0 Sensitivity of B 0  D 0 K* 0 improves by a factor of two in going from  B 0 =45  180 o. Residual dependence remains in global fit, but diluted due to other measurements. Analysis  B 0    B 0   B   D 0 (hh)K , B   D 0 (  )K  2538 B   D 0 (  s  )K  1225 B 0  D 0 (hh)K *0 448 BsDsKBsDsK 1624 B0DB0D 35 LHCb

3/10/08Prospects for gamma at LHCb24/20 B         and B 0   s     G.Guerrer CKM 2008