Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
CP violation: review and perspectives Tagir Aushev (ITEP)
B  D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
CPV measurements with Belle/KEKB Stephen L. Olsen Univ. of Hawai’i Feb 17, 2003 LCPAC meeting at KEK.
A. BondarModel-independent φ 3 measurement August 6, 2007Charm 2007, Cornell University1/15 γ/φ 3 model-independent Dalitz analysis (Dalitz+CP tagged Dalitz.
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 1 Lausanne –  measurements with Guillaume Thérin LPNHE – Paris Lausanne BaBar Measurements of  detector at SLAC.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Aug 6, Charm γ/φ 3 Impact from CLEO-c Using CP-Tagged D→K S,L ππ Decays Eric White - University of Illinois Qing He - University of Rochester for.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
7th February Determination of γ from B ± →DK ± : Input from CLEOc Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
B  and  2 /  3 results from the B factories May 20, 2006 Sheldon Stone Syracuse Nobu Katayama (KEK)
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
1 Disclaimer This talk is not for B physics experts. Taipei101 If you did it, you may check s during my talk. B0B0 B0B0.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
CP VIOLATION at B-factories A.Bondar (Budker INP,Novosibirsk) Measurements of large CPV in b  c c s modes Search for New Physics: CPV in b  s penguin.
LHCb status of CKM  from tree-level decays Stefania Ricciardi, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Stefania Ricciardi,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Fernando Martínez-Vidal, On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Measurements of the CKM angle  at BaBar.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
CP violation at B-factoris Introduction  1 /   2 /   3 /  Vub, D mixing, Bs Conclusion Pavel Krokovny KEK, Tsukuba, Japan KEK.
David Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BaBar Collaboration CKM phase and CP Violation in B Decays August 14, 2007 Daegu, Korea.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
1 Trees, penguins and boxes at LHCb Prospects for CP violation measurements at LHCb Tristan du Pree (Nikhef) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration 14 th.
Wouter Verkerke, UCSB CP Violation Measuring matter/anti-matter asymmetry with BaBar Wouter Verkerke University of California, Santa Barbara.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
F. Martínez-Vidal IFIC – Universitat de València-CSIC (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration)  from B ±  D (*)0 [K S     ]K (*)±  in BaBar Outline.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure  Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
ВД в эксперименте по измерению масс
Measurements of g and sin(2b+g ) in BaBar
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
γ/φ3 determination with B D0(*)K(*) Dalitz analysis
f3 measurements by Belle
B DK strategies in LHCb (part II)
Study of the suppressed decay B-DK- and B-D(*)CPK- decays at Belle
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Measurements of sin(2b + g) / sin(2f1 + f3)
Presentation transcript:

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Methods Methods Results Results Summary Summary

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Unitarity triangle Using unitarity requirement: sin2φ 1 (β) is measured with a good accuracy at B-factories. Measurement of all the angles needed to test SM.

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Relative phase: ( B –  DK – ), ( B +  DK + ) includes weak ( γ/φ 3 ) and strong ( δ ) phase. B +  D 0 K + decay If D 0 and D 0 decay into the same final state, Need to use the decay where V ub contribution interferes with another weak vertex. B –  D 0 K – : Amplitude ratio:

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Gronau-London-Wyler Gronau-London-Wyler method СР eigenstate of D -meson is used ( D CP ). CP-even : D 1  K + K –, π + π – CP-odd : D 2  K S π 0, K S ω, K S φ, K S η … for D 1 for D 2 Additional constraint: СР-asymmetry:  A 1,2 of different signs 4 equations (3 independent: ), 3 unknowns [Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 483] [Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 172]

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya GLW method (Belle)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya GLW method (Belle) Belle results (253 fb -1 ) hep-ex/ BD1KBD1K 1.13 ±0.16± ±0.14±0.05 BD2KBD2K 1.17±0.14± ±0.14±0.05 BD*1KBD*1K 1.41±0.25± ±0.22±0.04 BD*2KBD*2K 1.15±0.31± ±0.30±0.08 B ±  DK ± decay: B ±  D*K ±, D*  Dπ 0 decay: B +  D 1 K + B -  D 1 K - B +  D 2 K + B -  D 2 K - GLW analyses alone do not constrain γ/φ 3 significantly yet, but can be combined with other measurements and provide information on r B

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya GLW method (BaBar) BaBar results (211 fb -1 ) Phys.Rev. D73, , Phys.Rev. D72, B  D CP+ K 0.90±0.12± ±0.13±0.04 B  D CP- K 0.86±0.10± ±0.13±0.03 B  D CP+ K* 1.96±0.40± ±0.19±0.08 B  D CP- K* 0.65±0.26± ±0.40±0.12 B ±  DK ± decay: B ±  DK* ±, K* ±  K S π ± decay: r B 2 =-0.12±0.08(stat)±0.03(syst) r B 2 =0.30±0.25

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method D. Atwood, I. Dunietz and A. Soni, PRL 78, 3357 (1997); PRD 63, (2001) Enhancement of СР-violation due to use of Cabibbo-suppressed D decays B –  D 0 K – - color allowed D 0  K + π – - doubly Cabibbo-suppressed B –  D 0 K – - color suppressed D 0  K + π – - Cabibbo-allowed Interfering amplitudes are comparable 

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya ADS method (Belle) B + -> D 0 [K +  - ]  + B + -> D 0 [K -  + ]  + Peaking background from B + -> K +      decay. Using D sidebands to subtract it. After subtraction the signal yield is events

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya ADS method (Belle) Belle results (357 fb -1 ) hep-ex/ Suppressed channel not visible yet: Using r D =0.060±0.003, for maximum mixing ( φ 3 =0, δ=180° ): r B <0.18 (90% CL)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya B → D 0 K B → D *0 K (D *0 → D 0  0 ) B → D *0 K(D *0 → D 0  ) PRD 72 (2005) ADS method (BaBar) Suppressed channel not visible r B <0.23 (90% CL) for B  DK r B <0.16 for B  D*K Bondar & Gershon PRD70,091503(2004)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya D 0 K* + D 0 K 48 o <  <73 o For maximum mixing (  /φ 3 =0, δ=180°): r B 90% C.L. 1-CL GLW ADS combination 11 22 33 rBrB  [0,  ] & (  D +  B )  [0,2  ] rB=rB= DK*, GLW+ADS Constraints on r B (BaBar)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya ADS method (BaBar) B->D[K +  -  0 ] K hep-ex/ (ICHEP 06)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya ADS method (BaBar) B->D[K +  -  0 ] K hep-ex/ (ICHEP 06) r DK <0.039 (95% CL) r B <0.185 (95% CL)

Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, NagoyaSummary The statistics is not enough for measure the φ 3 /  using ADS and GLW methods The statistics is not enough for measure the φ 3 /  using ADS and GLW methods However these approaches can provide constrain for r B and can be used combined with Dalitz analysis method However these approaches can provide constrain for r B and can be used combined with Dalitz analysis method There are perspectives for improving the result with larger data set There are perspectives for improving the result with larger data set