John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8621 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD
Advertisements

Parts of typical slab formwork
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
University Health Building Thesis Final Presentation
Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Thesis Advisor: Dr.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
3711 Market Street 3711 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Zachary Yarnall l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Professor.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Jonathan Coan AE Senior Thesis April 10, 2012 Weill Cornell Medical Research Building New York, NY Images courtesy of Ennead Architects.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Game Day Building Post Tensioned Redesign AE Senior Thesis Spring 2009 Matthew Haapala BAE/MAE Structural Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Hanagan.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
The Odyssey Condominium Aaron Snyder Arlington, Virginia
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Joe Sharkey Structural Option Christiana Hospital 2010 Project Newark, DE.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Mountain Hotel Urban Virginia Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Professor Kevin Parfitt Benjamin Borden Structural Option.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Christopher Simmons l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Dr. Ali M. Memari Baltimore Hilton Convention Center Baltimore.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
N EW Y ORK, N EW Y ORK 100 Eleventh Avenue © Tyler E. Graybill | Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Presentation | April 12, 2010 Faculty.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Discovery Communications Headquarters Silver Springs, MD Josh Woolcock Structural Option Architectural Engineering Pennsylvania State University.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
AE Senior Thesis 2009 U.S. Pharmacopeia Headquarters Consolidation Rockville, MD Analysis and Design of a Mild Reinforced One way slab with Post Tensioned.
Student Health Center Jacob Brambley - AE (structural option)
The Executive Tower NW Washington DC Sean T Howard Structural Emphasis Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan æ Class of 2006 (Roof of the Federal Building, Chicago.
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
Arlington Gateway Hotel 801 North Glebe Road Arlington, Virginia Michael Gray Penn State University AE Senior Thesis Presentation 2005.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Lecture 39 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Ryan Johnson - Structural Option
FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller Senior Thesis, Spring 2006
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Presentation transcript:

John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Typical Floor

Existing Conditions 10-1/2” Concrete flat plate with 2-1/2” drop panels 10-1/2” Concrete flat plate with 2-1/2” drop panels 12”x24” columns 12”x24” columns Spread footing foundations Spread footing foundations Concrete shear wall lateral force resisting system Concrete shear wall lateral force resisting system 11 stories above grade 11 stories above grade 10’-3” typical floor to floor height 10’-3” typical floor to floor height Designed under IBC 2003 Designed under IBC 2003

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

New Proposal Replace original 10-1/2” normally reinforced slab with thinner post-tensioned slab Replace original 10-1/2” normally reinforced slab with thinner post-tensioned slab lower seismic base shear lower seismic base shear more economical system more economical system Examine behavior: Examine behavior: new lateral response new lateral response punching shear conditions, slab deflection punching shear conditions, slab deflection Footings, lateral force resisting system Footings, lateral force resisting system Analyze new cost and schedule associated with flooring system switch Analyze new cost and schedule associated with flooring system switch

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

PT slab is more economical Slimmer slab profile (8” vs. 10.5”) Slimmer slab profile (8” vs. 10.5”) Punching shear predicted to be ok Punching shear predicted to be ok Banded tendons spanning East-West Banded tendons spanning East-West Uniform tendons spanning North-South Uniform tendons spanning North-South Loading:40 psf (live) Loading:40 psf (live) 100 psf (dead) 28 psf (partitions, m/e/p) 168 psf

Column Adjustments

Tendon Profiles, Latitudinal 8” slab, cover requirements limit profile drape 8” slab, cover requirements limit profile drape Tendons calculated to balance 90% of the dead load Tendons calculated to balance 90% of the dead load 9 strands in exterior longitudinal spans 9 strands in exterior longitudinal spans 12 strands in interior spans 12 strands in interior spans

Tendon Profiles, Longitudinal 3 strands per tendon 3 strands per tendon Tendons spaced at 3’-0” to 4’-0” o.c. Tendons spaced at 3’-0” to 4’-0” o.c. End profiles terminated at center of slab End profiles terminated at center of slab Coordinate with slab openings/penetrations Coordinate with slab openings/penetrations

PT investigation continued 12” x 24” columns adequate for punching shear in all locations 12” x 24” columns adequate for punching shear in all locations Punching shear was found to be ok for worst case column,  Vc=110k>Vu=57k Punching shear was found to be ok for worst case column,  Vc=110k>Vu=57k Long term deflection is within appropriate limits Long term deflection is within appropriate limits Maximum deflection: Maximum deflection: positive – 0.6” positive – 0.6” negative – 0.2” negative – 0.2”

Slab Stresses at Midspan f b at jacking: 146 psiAllowable: 0.6f’c i =1800psi f b at jacking: 146 psiAllowable: 0.6f’c i =1800psi f t at jacking: -292 psiAllowable: 3√f’c i =164psi f t at jacking: -292 psiAllowable: 3√f’c i =164psi f b at service: 370 psiAllowable: 0.45f’c=2250psi f b at service: 370 psiAllowable: 0.45f’c=2250psi f t at service: -780 psiAllowable: 6√f’c=424psi f t at service: -780 psiAllowable: 6√f’c=424psi f’c=5000 psi f’c=5000 psi f’c i =3000 psi f’c i =3000 psi All conditions meet code, slab is ok All conditions meet code, slab is ok

Other considerations Overall building weight reduced by 11% Overall building weight reduced by 11% Seismic base shear decreased by 11% with weight savings, from 594k to 530k Seismic base shear decreased by 11% with weight savings, from 594k to 530k lateral system redesign unnecessary lateral system redesign unnecessary 70k reduced axial load on worst case column, footings were found to be same size or very similar 70k reduced axial load on worst case column, footings were found to be same size or very similar footing redesign unnecessary footing redesign unnecessary Wind drift decreased by 0.8” Wind drift decreased by 0.8” Seismic drift decreased by 1.5” Seismic drift decreased by 1.5”

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Presentation Outline Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Proposal Proposal Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Structural Depth – PT Slab Investigation Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact Construction Breadth – Cost and Construction Impact

Cost savings of $156,760 Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor+$360,570 Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor+$360,570 Decreased cost for rebar-$111,800 Decreased cost for rebar-$111,800 Decreased cost for slab-$380,000 Decreased cost for slab-$380,000 Other savings-$25,530 Other savings-$25,530 $ 156,760 This equates to a savings of approximately $172,100 after location and inflation are considered

Cost savings of $156,760 Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor+$360,570 Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor+$360,570 Decreased cost for rebar-$111,800 Decreased cost for rebar-$111,800 Decreased cost for slab-$380,000 Decreased cost for slab-$380,000 Other savings-$25,530 Other savings-$25,530 $ 156,760 This equates to a savings of approximately $172,100 after location and inflation are considered Savings equivalent:24,586 engineering computation pads (200 page tablet)

Schedule Changes +6.1 extra days per floor to place & stress tendons +6.1 extra days per floor to place & stress tendons -2.6 less days per floor for rebar placement -2.6 less days per floor for rebar placement -2.5 less days per floor for slab placement labor -2.5 less days per floor for slab placement labor=1 1 extra day per floor to change floor systems, 11 extra days total 1 extra day per floor to change floor systems, 11 extra days total

Conclusion – PT system recommended Pros: Pros: eliminate drop panels eliminate drop panels max slab deflection = L/580 max slab deflection = L/580 save $172,100 save $172,100 decreased drift from wind and seismic due to less severe P-delta effects decreased drift from wind and seismic due to less severe P-delta effects Cons: Cons: slab shrinks, cracks due to prestress slab shrinks, cracks due to prestress can be treated with pour stops can be treated with pour stops schedule elongated by 11 days schedule elongated by 11 days maintenance of tendons maintenance of tendons increased coordination needed increased coordination needed

Distinguished Speaker Series In case you missed it, encore showings will take place tonight at the following locations: In case you missed it, encore showings will take place tonight at the following locations:

Distinguished Speaker Series In case you missed it, encore showings will take place tonight at the following locations: In case you missed it, encore showings will take place tonight at the following locations: Bill Pickles’ Tap Room10:00 pm Bill Pickles’ Tap Room10:00 pm The All American Rathskeller10:30 pm The All American Rathskeller10:30 pm The Phyrst11:00 pm The Phyrst11:00 pm Café 210 West11:30 pm Café 210 West11:30 pm The Saloon12:00 am The Saloon12:00 am Zeno’s Pub12:30 am Zeno’s Pub12:30 am The Shandygaff1:00 am The Shandygaff1:00 am Mad Mex1:30 am Mad Mex1:30 am

Thanks! OTO Development OTO Development Hope Furrer Associates, Inc. Hope Furrer Associates, Inc. All AE faculty All AE faculty Online thesis mentors, all options (even CM) Online thesis mentors, all options (even CM) Everyone else who was involved Everyone else who was involved