Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress Jamie Malone Marty Guthrie U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Verification Requirements Program Integrity Final Rule.
Advertisements

§§668.16(e), (f) and  The institution must establish a reasonable SAP policy  WHAT MUST A RESONABLE POLICY CONTAIN? ◦ The policy must.
Verification - Definition  Process of verifying accuracy of Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) data  Regulations define:  Whose application.
Featuring Elena Olivier & Yolanda Cleveland. SSatisfactory Academic Progress SSchool must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress.
Final Regulations Published 10/29/10.  Repeating Coursework  Ability to Benefit rules  Validity of High School Diploma  Gainful Employment  Definition.
Session #37 A Student Eligibility Toolkit: New Guidance for Decisions You Make Marty Guthrie Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education.
S ATISFACTORY A CADEMIC P ROGRESS FASFAA Region V Spring Workshop April 1, 2011 Nova Southeastern University Presented by Anh Do, St. Thomas University.
SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Gregory Martin U.S. Department of Education Session FF-09.
Satisfactory Academic Progress 2012 All Directors Training Tim Bonnel Chancellor’s Office.
MASFAA Conference November 7, Satisfactory Academic Progress2 Authority Provisions of New SAP Regulations School Requirements Definitions, Terms.
Jamie A. Malone | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Foreign Schools Satisfactory Academic Progress Session 38.
With CONSUELA MITCHELL YOLANDA CLEVELAND. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards.
Satisfactory Academic Progress –Managing the Components Qualitative (grade-based) and Quantitative (time-based) measures.
SAP SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS PASFAA CONFERENCE OCTOBER, LANCASTER, PA.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education PASFAA Conference – Oct Pittsburgh, PA a.
SAP Satisfactory Academic Progress Schools must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include  Qualitative  Quantitative.
Verification 2012 New Aid Officer Workshop Consuela Mitchell Director of Student Financial Aid Services Tarrant County College-NE Campus Application.
Student Financial Aid. FAFSA UPDATES The Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, will provide a new option for dependent applicants.
You May, You Must, You Don’t Have to, You Cannot A Verification Quiz Kathy Tipton Guilford Technical Community College NCASFAA/SCASFAA Fall 2006 Conference.
Session #26 General Provisions and Non-Loan Program Issues - Student Carney McCullough Marty Guthrie U.S. Department of Education.
 Federal Financial Aid is financial assistance provided to students who fill out the FAFSA application and meet the requirements. Financial aid can include:
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students! 2 FSA Assessments: A Key to Compliance & Improvement Session #: S106.
Hosted by Yolanda Cleveland. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include.
Verification 1. Verification - Definitions  Subsidized student financial assistance programs Verification applies to Title IV programs where eligibility.
Jeff Baker Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education Federal Update October 26, 2012.
Jeff Baker U.S. Department of Education 2012 Software Developers Webinar #3 Policy Update.
2012 OrACRAO Meeting Sunriver Resort, Sunriver, Oregon Kathy Campbell, Dean of Enrollment Services and Financial Aid, Chemeketa Community College; Mike.
VERIFICATION Carney McCullough Office of Postsecondary Education.
SHARI AREHART Operations Analyst James Madison University.
MASFAA 2013 October 6 th – 9 th, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana Satisfactory Academic Progress Tara Piantanida-Kelly, USA Funds.
SAP Components 3 Components to SAP  Minimum Grade Point Average  Undergraduate Students: 2.0  Graduate Students: 3.0  Completion Rate  Each student.
Cathleen Wright Director of Financial Aid Texas Lutheran University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.
Satisfactory Academic Progress SAP – it’s not just for making syrup anymore!
Verification Marianna Deeken Virginia Hagins Session #34.
PASFAA Conference, Harrisburg PA Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman |
Verification Virginia Hagins U.S. Department of Education Session FF-07.
The New & Improved SAP Rules Rick Shipman Director of Financial Aid Michigan State University October, 2011 Grand Rapids, Michigan.
44 th NYSFAAA Conference “On Track for Excellence” Satisfactory Academic Progress Thomas J. Dalton, Excelsior College & Curt Gaume, Canisius College.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) U.S. Department of Education NJASFAA 2011 Sandy Santana a.
Verification Nebraska Association of Student Financial Aid administrators.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © 2013 NASFAA Verification Module 4.
RMASFAA 2012 SAP. SAP – a new beginning? (RMASFAA 2012) So, it’s been a year: what have you learned? Takeaways? Full Implementation?
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Eastern Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education May 2012.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education WVASFAA Conference Morgantown, WV April 2011.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) 1. What we will cover… 2 Changes in Federal Regulations SAP Policy Requirements Maximum Credits/Timeframe SAP Reviews.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Managing the Components & Monitoring Compliance.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
Verification, Tax Transcript Woes & Pell Lifetime Eligibility Limits Jo Lopez Front Range Community College.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © 2015 NASFAA Verification Module 4.
Presented By: Ma. Isabel Woods Texas A&M International University.
Financial Aid 201 August 8, 2012 Mary Kay Freshour Associate Director of Financial Aid Otterbein University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Keep Your Students on the Path to Completion.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
Student Eligibility A NASFAA Authorized Event Presented by [Name of Presenter/Association] [Location] [Date], 2016.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
The Must & may of SAP Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards (SAP)
Director of Financial Aid NASFAA National Chair
TASFAA 2018 Honoring the Past & Building the Future
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
TASFAA 2017 Education Is Key
SAP: Must or may 2018 new aid officer workshop Danchees Ingram
SAP Who? & R2T4 What? Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
Don’t let SAP get you into sticky situations!
Office of Student Financial Aid UT Southwestern Medical Center
Session #26 General Provisions and Non-Loan Program Issues - Student
Session GS2 Verification and Conflicting Information, Identification, and Resolution Carney McCullough and Jeff Baker U.S. Department of Education.
Presentation transcript:

Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress Jamie Malone Marty Guthrie U.S. Department of Education

Today’s Agenda Resources Verification Regulations Federal Register Notice Satisfactory Academic Progress Dear Colleague Letter Questions? 2

Resources For information, consult: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), published 6/18/10 –Describes all changes to current reg Final Rule, published 10/29/10 –Responds to comments and describes changes to NPRM –Not a comprehensive review of all reg changes 3

Verification Regulations 4

Verification Effective date delayed until July 1, 2012 – award year Institutions may need time to make changes to their institutional processing systems 5

Verification: General Changes Emphasizes updating requirements through change to subpart heading Removes references to individual programs Defines “subsidized student financial assistance programs” and “unsubsidized student financial assistance programs” 6

Verification: General Changes Subsidized— –Eligibility uses EFC –Verification applies –Pell Grant, FSEOG, FWS, Perkins, Direct Subsidized Loan Unsubsidized— –Eligibility does not use EFC –Verification does not apply –TEACH Grant, Iraq & Afghanistan Service Grant, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, Direct PLUS Loan 7

Verification: General Changes Uses “FAFSA information” instead of “application” Defines “specified year” as base year or year prior to base year –Allows for option of using income data from a different year –No plans to exercise this option at this time 8

Verification: General Changes Must complete verification prior to exercising professional judgment Codifies long-standing policy in regulations 9

Verification: Selection Eliminates 30% limit Department targeting error-prone items to select applications to verify Institutions must verify all applicants we select 10

Verification: Selection Institutions must continue to resolve conflicting information they believe is inaccurate Institutions keep flexibility to select additional information or applications for verification 11

Verification: Exclusions Removes certain exclusions Clarifies provisions applicable to— –Applicants –Parents of dependent applicants –Spouses of independent applicants Lists specific situations when parent’s or spouse’s information is not subject to verification 12

Verification: Updating Applicant required to update all changes in dependency status throughout the award year, except changes resulting from a change in the applicant’s marital status Applicant’s responsibility, not institution’s 13

Verification: Updating FAA may require applicant to update marital status to address inequity or to reflect more accurately the applicant’s ability to pay Documentation not required if the information has not changed during subsequent verification of household size and number in college 14

Verification: Items to Verify Annual Federal Register notice –Items to verify –Documentation Initially, will include the current five data elements 15

Verification: Documentation Specified as acceptable in annual Federal Register notice Retained current documentation requirements with technical changes Added option to retrieve electronic data from IRS 16

Verification: Documentation For applicants with tax filing extension –May require completed tax return when filed –Must re-verify AGI and taxes paid, when/if the tax return is submitted 17

Verification: Documentation Tax return not signed by the tax filer –Must be signed, typed, printed, or stamped by the tax preparer and –Contain the preparer’s SSN, EIN or PTIN 18

Verification: Interim Disbursements Technical and conforming changes May make a disbursement after completing verification but prior to receiving a corrected valid SAR or valid ISIR if the changes would not change the amount of aid 19

Verification: Interim Disbursements To avoid liability, must ensure necessary corrections are submitted to ED Valid SAR or valid ISIR required before disbursement can be made for all Title IV programs 20

Verification: Deadlines Require institutions to follow cash management procedures for Direct Loans Removed the requirement to pay Pell Grant on the higher EFC 21

Verification: Fund Recovery Requires institutions to reimburse program account if disbursement made without receiving corrected valid SAR or ISIR Requires recovery of overpayments that occur from interim disbursements for students employed under the FWS Program 22

Verifications: Corrections Removed $400 tolerance Require all corrections over $25 to be submitted Require all corrections of nondollar items 23

Federal Register Notice 24

Federal Register Notice Published Spring/Summer 2011 Describes verification items Outlines acceptable documentation Lists other verification resources 25

Satisfactory Academic Progress Regulations 26

Satisfactory Academic Progress Previously, SAP requirements and references were included in 3 regulatory sections –Administrative capability §668.16(e) –Student eligibility §668.32(f) –Satisfactory progress § Now all requirements are in § with cross references in §§668.16(e) and (f) 27

SAP: New Regulations New regulations provide— Continued flexibility for institutions to establish their SAP policies Additional flexibility for institutions that monitor SAP more often than annually Definitions for “warning” and “probation” In general, a student who is not making SAP is no longer eligible for Title IV aid 28

SAP: Policy Requirements Specified in § and include— Measurement of student’s progress at each evaluation— –Can take place each payment period, annually, or less often than each payment period –Must occur at the end of a payment period 29

SAP: Policy Requirements GPA that a student must achieve at each evaluation (qualitative standard) Pace of progression at each evaluation (quantitative standard) 30

SAP: Details on Standards Qualitative standard: required GPA –For programs more than 2 academic years: at the end of 2 years, at least a 2.0 or academic standing consistent with requirements for graduation Quantitative standard: pace at which a student must progress to complete within the maximum timeframe –Calculate by dividing cumulative successfully completed hours by cumulative hours attempted 31

SAP: Policy Requirements How student’s GPA and pace are affected by incompletes, withdrawals, repetitions, or transfers of credits Must count transfer hours accepted toward completion of the student’s program as both hours attempted and hours completed 32

SAP: Defined Terms Must incorporate the terminology used in these regulations Must explain terms and use consistently with these regulations Must make sure conditions of each term are clear to students 33

SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Financial Aid Warning Status assigned to a student who fails to make SAP at an institution that evaluates SAP at the end of each payment period Student may continue to receive Title IV aid for one payment period No appeal necessary 34

SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Financial Aid Probation Status assigned by an institution to a student who fails to make SAP, who has appealed, and has had eligibility for Title IV aid reinstated May impose conditions for student’s continued eligibility to receive Title IV aid 35

SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Maximum timeframe For an undergraduate program—basically 150% of the published length of the program For a graduate program—a period defined by the institution that is based on the length of the educational program 36

SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Appeal Process by which a student who is not meeting an institution’s SAP policy petitions the institution for reconsideration of the student’s eligibility for Title IV aid 37

SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Appeal (more) Must specify the conditions under which a student may appeal including— –Why the student failed to make SAP; and –What has changed that will allow the student to make SAP at the next evaluation 38

SAP: Frequency of Review Regulations are organized by frequency of SAP evaluation— –At the end of each payment period, or –Less frequently 39

SAP: Payment Period Review Evaluating at each payment period: If student fails to make SAP, student— Loses eligibility for Title IV aid May be placed on Financial Aid Warning for one payment period Must make SAP or may be placed on Financial Aid Probation after a successful appeal 40

SAP: Payment Period Review Evaluating SAP each payment period (more) After Financial Aid Probation, student— –Must be making SAP, or –Must be successfully following an academic plan 41

SAP: Academic Plans About academic plans— Not regulated General or specific Flexibility to address student situation Appeal needed to implement or change 42

SAP: Annual Review Evaluating less frequently: If student fails to make SAP, student— Loses eligibility for Title IV aid May be placed on Financial Aid Probation after an appeal After Financial Aid Probation, must be making SAP or successfully following an academic plan 43

SAP: Notifications Notifications Results of SAP review that impact the student’s eligibility for Title IV aid Specific elements required to appeal SAP, if appeal process is used Process for reestablishing eligibility for Title IV aid, if no appeal process is used 44

SAP: Questions People asked about… Using different rates of assessment for different classes of students Evaluating one factor at end of each payment period and another annually Implementing SAP for the 2011 summer crossover payment period 45

SAP Dear Colleague Letter Expected in summer 2011 Will include questions and answers clarifying the SAP provisions in the 10/29/10 regulations 46

47 Contact Information We welcome your feedback. You may contact us at: Phone: Fax: Phone: Fax: