1 Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Chapter 2: Logic & Incidence Geometry Back To the Very Basic Fundamentals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry Chapter 2 Terms.
Advertisements

Discrete Math Methods of proof 1.
Introduction to Proofs
Conditional Statements
Proofs, Recursion and Analysis of Algorithms Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 2 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesProofs,
Axiomatic systems and Incidence Geometry
The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods
Induction and recursion
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
So far we have learned about:
EE1J2 – Discrete Maths Lecture 5 Analysis of arguments (continued) More example proofs Formalisation of arguments in natural language Proof by contradiction.
2-5: Verifying Segment Relationships
Fall 2002CMSC Discrete Structures1 Let’s proceed to… Mathematical Reasoning.
Mathematical Induction Assume that we are given an infinite supply of stamps of two different denominations, 3 cents and and 5 cents. Prove using mathematical.
Adapted from Discrete Math
Unit 2 Reasoning & Proof.
WARM UP EXERCSE Consider the right triangle below with M the midpoint of the hypotenuse. Is MA = MC? Why or why not? MC B A 1.
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
Valid Arguments Decide if each argument is valid. If the stones are rolling, they are not gathering moss. If the stones are not gathering moss, they are.
CSCI 115 Chapter 2 Logic. CSCI 115 §2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations.
Geometry as a Deductive System or Structure. D Inductive Reasoning – observe specific cases to form a general rule Example: Little kid burns his hand.
Mathematical Structures A collection of objects with operations defined on them and the accompanying properties form a mathematical structure or system.
A Brief Summary for Exam 1 Subject Topics Propositional Logic (sections 1.1, 1.2) –Propositions Statement, Truth value, Proposition, Propositional symbol,
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 4 ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF.
Mathematical Arguments and Triangle Geometry
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Methods of Proofs PREDICATE LOGIC The “Quantifiers” and are known as predicate quantifiers. " means for all and means there exists. Example 1: If we.
Properties of Equality
10/17/2015 Prepared by Dr.Saad Alabbad1 CS100 : Discrete Structures Proof Techniques(1) Dr.Saad Alabbad Department of Computer Science
Homework Review notes Complete Worksheet #1. Homework Let A = {a,b,c,d}, B = {a,b,c,d,e}, C = {a,d}, D = {b, c} Describe any subset relationships. 1.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
2.3Logical Implication: Rules of Inference From the notion of a valid argument, we begin a formal study of what we shall mean by an argument and when such.
MAT 360 Lecture 4 Projective and affine planes. Undefined terms  Point  Line  Incidence.
INDUCTIVE REASONING AND CONJECTURE. DEFINITIONS Conjecture: a best guess based on known information. Inductive Reasoning: using specific examples to arrive.
1 CMSC 250 Discrete Structures CMSC 250 Lecture 1.
1 Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Chapter 2: Logic & Incidence Geometry Back To the Very Basic Fundamentals.
Conjecture: an educated guess
Naïve Set Theory. Basic Definitions Naïve set theory is the non-axiomatic treatment of set theory. In the axiomatic treatment, which we will only allude.
1 Discrete Structures – CNS2300 Text Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H. Rosen (5 th Edition) Chapter 3 The Foundations: Logic and Proof,
Methods of Proof Dr. Yasir Ali. Proof A (logical) proof of a statement is a finite sequence of statements (called the steps of the proof) leading from.
Lesson 1.7/1.8 Deductive Structure and Statements of Logic Objective: Recognize that geometry is based on deductive structure, identify undefined terms,
Chapter 2 Symbolic Logic. Section 2-1 Truth, Equivalence and Implication.
Inverse, Contrapositive & indirect proofs Sections 6.2/6.3.
2.3 Methods of Proof.
Week 4 - Friday.  What did we talk about last time?  Floor and ceiling  Proof by contradiction.
Chapter 5. Section 5.1 Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Proof Methods , , ~, ,  Instructor: Hayk Melikya Purpose of Section:Most theorems in mathematics.
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
Section 2.1 Conditional Statements
Deductive Structure and Statements of Logic
Y. Davis Geometry Notes Chapter 2.
Chapter 2 Sets and Functions.
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
2 Chapter Introduction to Logic and Sets
Sets and Logic…. Chapter 3
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Deductive Structure and Statements of Logic
A Brief Summary for Exam 1
(1.4) An Introduction to Logic
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Computer Security: Art and Science, 2nd Edition
Elementary Number Theory & Proofs
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Logic Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements.
Mathematical Reasoning
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Chapter 2: Logic & Incidence Geometry Back To the Very Basic Fundamentals

2 Theorems and Proofs A mathematical theorem is a conditional statement of the form: If H, then C. (In symbols: H  C) A mathematical proof is a list o statements, along with a justification for each statement, ending with the conclusion expected.

3 Logic Rules (1) Rule 1:The following are the six types of justifications allowed for statements in proofs: 1. By hypothesis By axiom By theorem By definition By (previous) step By rule... of logic

4 Logic Rules (2) Rule 2: Indirect Proof [redutio ad absurdum (RAA)] : To prove a statement H  C, assume the negation of statement C (RAA hypothesis and deduce an absurd statemtent, using H if needed. To prove: H  C 1. Assume H  ~C (Symbol for negation of C: ~C) 2. Use this idea to arrive at a contradiction to H or some other known theorem, definition or axiom. ( Symbol for contradiction:  )

5 Logic Rules (Some of DeMorgan’s Laws) (3) Rule 3: The statement ~(~S) means S. Rule 4: The statement ~[H  C] is the same statement as H & ~C. (& and  mean “and”) (Alternate symbols: H  ~C) Rule 5: The statement ~ [S 1  S 2 ] means the same thing as [~ S 1  ~S 2 ]. (  means “or”) A contradiction (absurd statement) is a statement of the form S  ~S. (  )

6 Logic Rules: Quantifiers (1) (4) Quantifiers are of two types: –Universal: For all x …, For any x …, For every x…, If x is any… (Symbol:  x) (Note: For all… x does NOT imply the existence of anything!) –Existential: There exists an x…, For some x…, There are x…, There is an x… (Symbol:  x) Statements involving quantifiers: If S is a statement that says something about x, written S(x), and it is quantified, we write for example:  x S(x) or  x S(x). …

7 Logic Rules: Quantifiers (2) (5) Rule 6: The statement ~[  x S(x) ] means the same as  x ~S(x). Rule 7: The statement ~[  x S(x)] means the same as  x ~S(x).

8 Logic Rules: Implication (6) Rule 8: If P  Q and P are several steps in a proof, the Q is a justifiable step. Conditional Statement: P  Q (If P, then Q.) –Its converse: Q  P –Its inverse: P  ~Q (negation) –Its contrapositive: ~Q  ~P Logically equivalent: P  Q. “P if and only if Q” P is logically equivalent to Q. (P and Q are the same thing!)

9 Logic Rules: Tautologies (6) Rule 9: Statements that are true strictly because of their form and not what individual parts might “say”. A) [ [P  Q ]  [Q  R] ]  [P  R] (Transitive) B) [P  Q]  P, or, [P  Q]  Q (Inclusive) C) [~Q  ~P]  [P  Q] (Contrapositive)

10 Logic Rules (7) Rule 10: (The Excluded Middle) For every statement P, P  ~P is a valid step in a proof. Rule 11: (Proof by cases) Suppose the disjunction of statements S 1  S 2  …  S n is already a valid step in a proof. Suppose that the proofs of C are carried out from each of the case assumptions S 1, S 2 … S n. Then C can be concluded as a valid step in the proof.

11 Incidence Geometry (1) Incidence Axioms I-1:For every point P and for every point Q not equal to P there exists a unique line l incident with P and Q. I-2:For every line l there exist at least two distinct points that are incident with l. I-3:There exist three distince points with the property that no line is incident with all three of them.

12 Incidence Geometry (2) Incidence Propositions P-2.1: If l and m are distinct lines that are not parallel, then l and m have a unique point in common. P-2.2: There exist three distinct lines that are not concurrent. P-2.3: For every line there is at least one point not lying on it. P-2.4: For every point there is at least one line not passing through it. P-2.5: For every point P there exist at least two lines through P.

13 Example 5: Isomorphism -- 1) one and only one element goes to each member of the other set. 2) All elements in the range are used up.

14 Projective and Affine Planes A projective plane is a model of the incidence axioms having the elliptical property (any two lines meet) and such that every line has a t least three distinct points lying on it. An affine plane is a model of incidence geometry having the Euclidean parallel property

15 Equivalence Relations An equivalence relationship ”~” between two objects “a and b” is a relationship with these three properties: 1. a ~ a, i.e. a is equivalent to itself. (reflexive) 2. a ~ b  b ~ a. (symmetric) 3. [a ~ b  b ~ c]  [a ~ c]. (transitive). Examples of equivalence relations: a = b (equality) x  y (similar) l || m (parallel) p  q (perpendicular) Example of relations not equivalence classes. G < H (less than) C  D (proper subset)

16 Equivalence Classes An equivalence class C is the set of all objects y equivalent to some object x. C ={ y : y~x} Example: Given the affine plane Aand a line l in A (l  A) the set of all lines m parallel to l would be an equivalence class and represented by [l] = {x : x || l, l  A} m  [l] (m is one of the x’s. We write m ~ l and also [m] ~ [l].

17 Points at Infinity Points at infinity, by definition, are these equivalence classes defined in the above example. The line at infinity l  is the set of all the points at infinity! l  ={[t] : [t] ~ [l], l any line in A}, i.e. l  = {[l], [k],[r]... where l, k, r  A but none are parallel to each other}.