Identifying and Promoting Family Outcomes at the Local Level Illinois Part C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Advertisements

Effective Supervision
Collecting Citizen Input Management Learning Laboratories Presentation to Morrisville, NC January 2014.
Self Study Orientation Community Living Burlington.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
NH’s PTI Program and Part C Office: Collaborating for the Benefit of Families Presented by: Michelle Lewis (NH PTI Director, ICC Chair)
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Research Policy Practice National Dialogue: Phase III The Journey Ahead February 28, 2013.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Webinar—General Information Training will begin in a moment; all phone lines are currently muted.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Workforce Planning Survey Conducted by DOE: Research & Planning ( ) for the Departments of:  Employment  Family Services  Workforce Services.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.
Learn How States Are Finding “Hard-to-reach” Students for Post-school Outcome Data Collection! How the Heck Do We Contact Some of Our Former Students?
Maureen Sullivan Vermont’s Family Infant and Toddler Program October 7, 2009 Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Data.
SWRK 292 Thesis/Project Seminar. Expectations for Course Apply research concepts from SWRK 291. Write first three chapters of your project or thesis.
Maple Valley MultiCare Clinic Level III NCQA Certified Patient Centered Medical Home.
Evaluating the Use of Bright Futures Educational Materials with Parents of Young Children with Special Needs Janel D. Lauer, OTR/L Health Services MPH.
2012 West Texas Assessment Conference CREATING A CULTURE OF ASSESSMENT IN NON-INSTRUCTIONAL AREAS KARA LARKAN-SKINNER, DIRECTOR OF IR AND IE & KRISTIN.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Questionnaires and Interviews
Challenges in Formative Assessment across ENCAP, HISAR, and CARBS Melanie Bigold, Rob Gossedge, Casper Hoedemaekers, Tracey Loughran, and Maki Umemura.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for a Local Early Intervention System Infant & Toddler.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
CREP Center for Research in Educational Policy The Center for Research in Educational Policy Best Practices in Program Evaluation: Strategies for Increasing.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Becoming legitimate: promoting the use of reciprocal peer learning for early career academics Stuart McGugan & Christos Petichakis Centre for Lifelong.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
California Early Start Network: A statewide videoconference community of practice Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern, a set.
Evaluating a Research Report
How to Explain the Numbers: Helping Staff, Parents, and Other Stakeholders Understand the Results of the NCSEAM Surveys for Part C and 619 Batya Elbaum,
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Autism Team Training in South Dakota Presented by Brittany Schmidt, MA-CCC/SLP Center for Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorders Program
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea.
Parent Involvement: Who’s Accountable? Who Benefits? Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. University of Miami Annual Meeting of The Family Cafe Orlando, FL June 3, 2006.
Strengthening Connections between Birth Hospitals and WIC Programs to Improve Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Formative Evaluation Amanda Bilski March 4, 2015.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Pam Roush, Director WV Birth to Three October 7, 2009.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Together We Grow North Carolina Early Intervention Services EISAS Parent Survey: Assessment of Early Intervention Service Provider Quality Presenters:
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
Formatting a Mail Questionnaire  Appearance and placement of questions on page(s)  A well-planned and constructed questionnaire will increase response.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Elections Task Force As requested by the Board of Supervisors, staff has conducted an evaluation of the election process with specific focus on identifying.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Effective Collaboration between Parent Centers and Early Childhood.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Building Successful Collaboration between Parent Centers.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Classroom Self-Assessment Using the ICP: Evaluation of the Process Award of Excellence in Inclusion of Children with Special Needs ExceleRate Illinois.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Office of Children's Services
2017 On the Ball Initiative On the Ball is a collaborative HSE initiative designed to refresh and re-energise HSE , with the ultimate goal of achieving.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Presentation transcript:

Identifying and Promoting Family Outcomes at the Local Level Illinois Part C

Illinois Process Illinois has used its own version of the Family Outcomes Survey (includes three additional items) Surveys are primarily distributed to families via their local service coordination agency during the course of an IFSP meeting, but direct mailing is allowed Families receive a cover letter from the lead agency, a survey, and a postage-paid, addressed return envelope Follow up postcards and letters are sent as reminders following survey delivery to enhance return rate Completed surveys are sent to the early intervention training program and forwarded to a university for analysis

Illinois Process Data is aggregated at the university, paired with demographic information from the statewide data system, and shared with the lead agency and the individual service coordination agencies. Each service coordination agency receives a variety of descriptive statistics for their agency as well as statewide statistics for comparative purposes

Data Uses Survey data has been used for a variety of statewide purposes: –To identify system processes that are not supporting family outcomes, i.e. transition from early intervention to early childhood special education –To identify areas in which families need more information, i.e. topics for early intervention newsletter –To improve morale and encourage better adherence to processes, i.e. service coordinators received letters from Early Intervention Bureau Chief –To gain a better understanding of system-wide concerns versus local area needs

Data Uses Data has also been used locally: –To determine whether or not an individual area is out of line with other families’ experiences –To let staff, agency, and families know how their families’ experiences compares to other early intervention families –During staff meetings, to review results and discuss how to effect change

Data Uses Service coordinator letters have been used to: –Commend staff in front of peers –Inform performance appraisal process and celebrate success –Focus on positives during staff meetings

Potential Uses To determine needs in a particular area, i.e. if families indicate difficulty participating in activities, consider making more information about local activities available or consider providing information about resources that may facilitate participation Individual comments may help supervisors address individual staff performance concerns or enhance an individual family’s outcomes

Additional Request Local agencies have requested summaries of both positive and negative survey comments so that they can work on areas that need improvement –so far only positive comments about service coordinators/service coordination agencies have been shared locally; –overarching concerns have been shared with lead agency; –survey cover letter currently lets families know that individual results will not be shared- some concerned with honesty/openness of feedback if individual responses are shared

Future Considerations Initial focus has been on improving returns and representativeness Consider alternate formats for responses Analyze relationships between demographic characteristics of child/family and reported outcomes Find ways to make data meaningful/ interesting for local stakeholders so that they use it for improvements