1 WFC3 – Critical Science Review Science Driven CEIs Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospects – JWST, EUCLID, WFIRST Jeff Kruk (GSFC)
Advertisements

C. Beichman, Dimitra Touli, Gautam Vasisht, Roger Smith Tom Greene
The Second Generation of IR detectors for WFC3 Massimo Robberto European Space Agency and Space Telescope Science Institute.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Precision Spectroscopy: some considerations S. Deustua STSCI 2014 STSCI Calibration Workshop 1.
SDW Marco Sirianni Marco Sirianni (ESA/STScI) Max Mutchler (STSci) Radiation Damage in HST Detectors.
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
Astronomical Detectors
SECCI/COR2 Status Report SECCHI CONSORTIUM MEETING D. Socker, S. Plunkett, A. Vourlidas.
Hubble Space Telescope Coronagraphs John Krist Space Telescope Science Institute.
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
Photon Counting Sensors for Future Missions
Astronomical Instrumentation Often, astronomers use additional optics between the telescope optics and their detectors. This is called the instrumentation.
1st Eddington Workshop. Córdoba, June 14th, 2001 J. Miguel Mas-Hesse 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary design.
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, K. S. Long, J. W. MacKenty, K. Noeske, J. Biretta, and the WFC3 team (STScI) WFC3 : Understanding and mitigating UVIS charge.
Advanced Concepts & Science Payloads Office Eddicam/EST MeetingPage 1 CCD Procurement Schedule driven Review off-the shelf availability Specific mode of.
1 COROT WEAEK Meudon May The CCD performances by Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD team on stage Régis Schmidt, Bertrand le.
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Hubble Space Telescope James C. Green University of Colorado Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Design and Capabilities.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Science with the new HST after SM4 WFC3 slitless spectroscopy Harald Kuntschner Martin Kümmel, Jeremy R. Walsh (ST-ECF) WFC3-team at STScI and NASA.
Performances of the COROT CCDs for high accuracy photometry Pernelle Bernardi and the CCD team From Meudon : Tristan Buey, Vincent Lapeyrere, Régis Schmidt,
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
ST–ECF UC, Dec 01 1 NGST support at the ST-ECF Bob Fosbury
Polariametry with NICMOS Dean C. Hines & Glenn Schneider Space Science Institute & Steward Observatory.
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
HST Cal Conf -- Oct 27, 2005 Calibration Status and Results for Wide Field Camera 3 – R. Kimble/GSFC, Calibration Status and Results.
NICMOS Status Roelof de Jong (STScI) and the NICMOS team: Santiago Arribas, Elizabeth Barker, Eddie Bergeron, Ilana Dashevsky, Anton Koekemoer, Sangeeta.
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
TIPS May 22, 20081H. Bushouse. TIPS May 22, 20082H. Bushouse TV3 Science Team Cast of “Characters” Instrument Scientists: –Sylvia Baggett –Howard Bond.
Observational Astrophysics I
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
1 TIPS May 17, 2007 WFC3 Ambient Calibration #2 Results H. Bushouse.
"Data contained herein is exempt from ITAR regulations under CFR 125.4(13) -- data approved for public disclosure." 19 Sept, 2002TIPS – WFC3 Status 1 -UVIS.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Jan 15, 2004WFC3 TIPS – John W. MacKenty1 WFC3 TIPS Presentation January 15, 2004 Optical Stimulus.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
The Second Generation of IR detectors for WFC3 Massimo Robberto European Space Agency and Space Telescope Science Institute.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
NIRISS and Transit Spectroscopy (What you should know before observing with NIRISS) Loïc Albert for the NIRISS Team Enabling Transiting Exoplanet Science.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
STScI 2010 Calibration Workshop The NICMOS Legacy Archival Recalibration Project Anton M. Koekemoer and the STScI NICMOS Team (E. Barker, E. Bergeron,
WFC3 SMOV Report for TIPS 16 July 2009 John MacKenty This presentation contains material that is embargoed until after the SM4 ERO press conference. Images/spectra.
Introduction NICMOS (Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectroscopy) was installed on the Hubble Space Telescope during SM2 in 1997 and has been the.
February 21, 2002TIPS meeting1 "Data contained herein is exempt from ITAR regulations under CFR 125.4(13) -- data approved for public disclosure." TIPS.
May 22, 2003WFC3 Report at the June 03 TIPS1 Optical alignment and image quality testing at GSFC Test lead: Bill Eichorn, GSFC Test conductors: George.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
Image Stability  ACS SMOV image stability test (prop 9017) went from a cold soak (anti-solar pointing) for 8 orbits to a hot attitude (including off-nominal.
HST Cal Conf -- Oct 27, Calibration Status and Results for Wide Field Camera 3 – R. Kimble/GSFC, Calibration Status and Results.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 Performance Summary in Key Science Areas Verify that WFC3 as designed is capable of carrying out the WFC3.
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, J. MacKenty, J. Biretta, K. Noeske, and the WFC3 team (STScI) HST/WFC3 UVIS Detectors: Radiation Damage Effects and Mitigation.
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
NIRSpec simulation data-package
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
A CMOS Image Sensor with Non-Destructive Readout Capability: Performance and Operational Considerations for Ground-Based Astronomy Presented by: Gary Sims,
SCIENTIFIC CMOS PIXELS
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Presentation transcript:

1 WFC3 – Critical Science Review Science Driven CEIs Requirements

2 The “Critical Science Metric” High-z Universe Nearby Galaxies Resolved Stellar Pop. Stars & ISM Solar System Detectors Spectral coverage Q.E. Read Out Noise Dark Current C.T.E. and pedestal Radiation Hardness Cosmetics Optics Field and Sampling PSF: encircled energy PSF: stability PSF: uniformity Throughput Ghosts and Stray light Filters

3 The “Critical Science Metric” High-z Universe Nearby Galaxies Resolved Stellar Pop. Stars & ISM Solar System Operations Readout modes I.T. Range Readout time Overheads Saturation limit Subarrays and rebinning Mechanical stability Calibration

4 Science Driven CEIs Requirements 4.3 Optical Performance 4.4 Spectral Performance 4.5 UVIS Channel Shutter Performance 4.6 UVIS Channel Detector Requirements 4.7 CCD Detector Thermal Control 4.8 IR Channel Detector Requirements 4.9 HgCdTe Detector Thermal Control 4.10 Observational Requirements 4.11 Calibration CEIS - Sect. 4

5 Science Driven CEIs Requirements an “astronomer friendly” view: 1. UVIS Detectors 2. IR Detector 3. Optics 4. Filters 5. Operations

6 1. UVIS DETECTORS

7 UVIS Detectors – specs (1/2) Number of detectors 2 Type CCD Backside Illuminated UV Coated Supplementary Buried Channels (SBC) Producer Marconi (former EEV) Format 2048  4096 Quantum Efficiency –Range and absolute value see viewgraph –Stability  0.2 %/hr 1   1.0 %/month < 300nm) Read-out noise 4.0 e/read (3e 4.27 min R.O.time Dark current< C for 90% of the pixels Operability >99% good pixels Bias stability <2 e rms during read

8 UVIS Detectors – specs (2/2) Linearity >95%, correctable to >99.7% Full well capacity 50,000 e/pix (85,000 goal) Charge-transfer efficiency > 1620 and 40,000 e/pix (see viewgraphs) Pixel-to pixel response – uniformity better than 2%; nm (0.5% goal) – stability <0.2 % over 1 hr (see Q.E.) Radiation hardness – Absolute sensitivity <2,000 e/event – Stability (SAA) 90%

9 MARCONI CCD – Q.E nm optimized

10 The CCD context

11 CTE anomaly: STIS data Courtesy R. Gilliland (STScI) NGC 6752, 8  20s, ‘D’ amp at the top SITe 1024  1024 CCD thinned backside

12 CTE anomaly: STIS data Courtesy R. Gilliland (STScI) NGC 6752, 8  20s, ‘B’ amp at the bottom

13 CTE losses in WF/PC2 “…preliminary evidence for accelerating growing rate.” (“Charge Transfer Efficiency in the WF/PC2 CCD Arrays” J. Biretta et al., June 2000 AAS)

14 Improving CTE for WFC3

15 Improving CTE for WFC3 M. Robbins (Marconi Apple.Tech.): “Possibility of limiting the radiation damage effects in CCDs”, in CCD Detector CTE workshop, STScI, January 2000 (

16 2. IR Detectors - specs (1/2) Number of detectors 1 Type HgCdTe/ZnCdTe MBE on WFC3-1R MUX Producer Rockwell Science Center Pixel size 18  m Format 1014  1014 Quantum Efficiency –Range and absolute value see viewgraph –Stability  0.5 %/hr p-p;  1.0 %/month Minimum | Target | 100% Incentive Read-out noise | | <15 100KHz Dark current | | < K Operability | | >98 % Bias stability <2 e rms during read

17 IR Detectors - specs (2/2) Amplifier glow <10 e/pix/read at the center <400 e/pix/read at the border (<5%) Linearity >95%, correctable to >99.7% Full well capacity 100,000 e/pix (150,000 goal) Pixel-to pixel response – uniformity better than 2%; nm (0.5% goal) – stability <0.2 % over 1 hr ; <1% over 2 months Radiation hardness – Absolute sensitivity <1,000 e/event – Stability (SAA) 90%

18 IR detector Q.E.

19

20 Improvements over NICMOS 1.Amplifier glow 2.Vignetting 3.Filter ghosts 4.Persistence 5.Column new MUX design (WFC3-1R) > NGST development HgCdTe on ZnCdTe provide better lattice matching new Conexant 0.5  m capability 240 s later no optical misalignment detector tilted with respect to the chief ray

 5 reference pixels Improvement over NICMOS Residual bias (pedestal) Variable DC offset, thermally driven and 1/f time variable, reduces the sensitivity. Present in NICMOS and in first generation of Hawaii detectors  1014 active pixels Solved with new MUX design (WFC3-1R) using reference pixels

22 3. UVIS Optics specs Range nm ( nm emphasis) Field of view 162”  160” Pixel separation/scale 39.6 mas (nominal); f/31 Field distortion see viewgraph; correctable to.2pix Induced polarization <6.5% (<5% goal) Image quality – encircled energy see viewgraph – jitter < 3 mas (1/13 pix) 1  over 1300sec – drift < 10 mas (1/4 pix) p-p over 2 orbits Optics see viewgraph

23 UVIS Channel – field distortion

24 UVIS channel encircled energy

25 IR Optics specs Range nm ( nm emphasis) Field of view 123”  139” Pixel size 0.121”  0137” Field distortion see viewgraph; correctable to.2pix Induced polarization <5% Image quality – encircled energy see viewgraph – jitter < 6 mas (1/20 pix) 1  over 1300sec – drift < 20 mas (1/5 pix) p-p over 2 orbits Optics see viewgraph

26 IR Channel – field distortion

27 IR channel encircled energy

28 Optics and coating

29 Throughput specs vs. actual

30 Pupil image and OTA throughput Footprints of ray bundles from nine field points 0.5 mm in front of the pupil image. The cold stop allows an annular transmission region and the hatched areas indicate areas that block light due to the oversized cold stop. The throughput efficiency of this cold mask is 95%. We add 10% for spiders, M1 pods, diffraction effects and alignment tolerances. 15% throughput loss due to the HST obstructions, plus 15% throughput loss due to the cold stop and pupil masking

31 WFC3 subsystems throughput WFC3 optics OTA detectors

32 WFC3 overall throughput Photon flux OTA WFC3optics detectors

33 4. Filter specs Total number of spectral components:48 16 Very Broad Band 4 - Broad Band135 Medium Band 83 Narrow Band17 6 Narrow Band Quad Elements 5  4 - UV Prism 1- Grisms -2 UVISIR

34 UVIS filters

35 IR filters

36 Operations Standard observing modeIMAGING MULTIACCUM (1+15) Integration time –Minimum (readout/buffer)2 4 4 ampli –Longer 1 orbit (~3000 s) Readout schemes –SubarrayYY –Rebinning2  2N/A –Gain setting1, 2, 4, 8 e/bit1/2/4/8 e/bit Overheads –Filter changemax 60 s –Channel change150 s (except power conserving mode) –Data Buffer2 UVIS images OR 2  IR ramps (IR reads) Calibration: on-board flat/field simulators between 2000A and 2micron must provide… –Uniformity within a factor 2 over both fields of view –Stability >99% /hr and >95% /yr –Flux>10,000e/10min (all filters) UVISIR

37 The end