High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Advertisements

Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Fermilab Booster Diagnostics, Monitors, and Software for Operational Control of Residual Radiation William Pellico Booster Accelerator FNAL HB2008.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Commissioning of the Fermilab Accelerators for NuMI Operation Robert Zwaska University of Texas at Austin NBI 2003 November 7, 2003.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Run II DOE Review - Booster Eric Prebys Booster Group Leader FNAL Beams Division.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Proton Improvement Plan William Pellico FRA Visiting Committee Meeting March 14-15, 2011.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska January 7, 2013 All-Experimenters Meeting.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Improvement Plan Bill Pellico April 19, 2013 NOvA collaboration Meeting Bill Pellico NOvA.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
Early Beam Injection in the Fermilab Booster & its Implementation Plan Chandra Bhat Todd’s Operation Meeting /12/2015 Chandra Bhat Abstract:
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
Second Harmonic capture in the IPNS RCS: Transition from SH to fundamental rf operation during the acceleration cycle using CAPTURE_SPC Jeff Dooling Presented.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
SNuMI: WBS 1.1 Booster Upgrades Eric Prebys $642K FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A) xx% contingency Main Injector & Recycler BNB NuMI Tunnel Booster Ring.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
PIP Update Oct 29 th Agenda Summary Update – Current Activities – Updates – Additional Meetings/Notes.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska September 9, 2013 All-Experimenters Meeting.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Summary of Working Group 3: Rings Ioanis Kourbanis and Valeri Lebedev PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 9-10 November 2015.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
PIP II Booster William Pellico PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9-11 March 2015.
Booster High Power RF at PIP-II Era John Reid February 18, 2014.
PPP Booster. Outline of Booster PPP tasks Beam Quality Goals K Seiya W Pellico Injection Dave Johnson CY Tan W Pellico Capture CY Tan K Seiya W Pellico.
Welcome! Robert Zwaska 23 November 2015 Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements.
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015

Outline Overview of present Booster –Loss profile (time and locations) –Ramp up of Booster Planned effort to address beam loss (highlights) –PIP tasks to reach flux goals – look at loss points of cycle –PIP Booster physics 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations2

Present Booster Loss Profile 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations3 Booster has three loss points during the cycle: Injection/start of acceleration Largest fraction of loss 400 to 800 MeV Several components Transition RF voltage issue (soon done) Orbit control Space charge (often stated?) Extraction Limited aperture Kicker rise time RF manipulations Injection Extraction Transition

Above plot is for 1.3E17 pph – 4.3e12/pulse at ~9 Hz 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations4 Notch beam absorber Extraction Collimator Acceptable trip value based upon radiation surveys and historic work activates when one of these scaled BLM readings reach 1 beam is inhibited Booster also has a running sum average loss of 525 watts uses the Booster beam toroid this is a Proton Source department safety net Tunnel Locations Plot is of normalized BLMs to trip point value

Recent radiation survey 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations5 Surveys reflect the BLM data and are used to set the trip points of the BLM system Note: the BLM system is not part of the shielding protection Notch beam absorber Collimators Extraction Injection

Booster hardware and beam physics improvements (Booster was loss limited but became cycle rate limited) 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations6 Booster pph for the past 8 years Average has gone up as improvements have been made like collimators, correctors, notching system, apertures, dampers… Jump at the end of FY15 is Booster achieving 15 Hz (1.4E17 pph). Refurbishing of Booster cavities – required reduced intensity

Road map to higher flux (and higher intensity) PIP (and earlier upgrades) Series of upgrades and improvements to address immediate needs and longer term goals Immense progress has been made Flux has gone up by 10X Uncontrolled losses have been greatly reduced Efficiency is up – activation has been reduced even at higher pph The goal is to now double the flux but not increase the activation (remain at 2012 levels) 1.Increase beam cycle repetition rate to 15 Hz – first step done 2.Maintain uptime >85% - time will tell but many items addressed 3.Reduce losses by another 50% - lots of ideas and plans 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations7

Booster/PIP efficiency plot with two planned improvements Booster Efficiency % Booster Intensity/Pulse E12 Pre-Acc laser Notch Clean out in Booster Modified Capture Longer Injection Final Efficiency /9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations8 Booster/PIP goal is to delivery 4.3E12/pulse at 15 Hz or 2.3E17 pph. To achieve that and remain at our present activation levels Booster needs to operate at around 94% efficiency.

Looking at the three beam loss points in the cycle Injection and start of ramp – 1 st loss point in cycle Injection/Capture and start of ramp Paraphase RF capture ( ‘A’ and ‘B’ stations) Working on new low level controls that will allow for better balancing of the two RF Additional RF stations will allow for adjustments to accommodate failed stations Working on an early injection scheme that simulations say will reduce longitudinal growth and some beam loss 2 nd harmonic cavity to mitigate space charge and lower loss Orbit control/LOCO – adjusting corrector break points and beta beating GMPS regulation – improve our injection bend field/orbit and reduce beam loss Still some improvements to notching – capture of losses in absorber Move notch creation from Booster to the 750 KeV injector line 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations9

Examples of early injection studies 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations10 Goal: improve capture of the DC Linac beam preserving the longitudinal emittances and reducing capture loss RF Envelope Beam pickup B dot– measured at reference magnet Injection typically near zero crossing

Early in cycle Booster beam loss 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations11 Notch created 100us after capture most of beam is kicked into new absorber but some gets lost around the ring expectation is to move this process to the 750 KeV line using laser notching small orbit variations also impact loss profiles mostly due to energy and bend field variations

Booster Notch 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations12 Notch created at 400 MeV injection Notch ‘cleaned out’ – by extraction time Lost in Booster at horizontal apertures Limitations of making notch in Booster could not kick the beam out cleanly much improved over previous system Linac notch will remove most of this loss from the tunnel

Transition – 2 nd loss point in cycle Transition –Additional fundamental mode RF cavities Helps Quad damper Allows for some RF over focusing bumps (balancing SC effect) –Considering adding a 2 nd harmonic cavity 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations13 Focus free transition crossing (FFTC) – reduce bucket mismatch Additional volts – negative mass instabilities –Low level controls upgrade to allow for better phase control

Extraction – 3 rd loss point This loss point has the typical issues: septa magnet aperture, kicker rise times Additional issues with RF manipulations required for downstream machines –bunch rotation –phase lock process and the required radial position motion This represents a very small beam loss –occurs every cycle at 8 GeV –needs to be cleaned up for the higher cycle rate / higher intensity operations 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations14

Summary Booster will ramp up the flux this year –doubling over previous high operating point – from 1.1E17 pph to 2.3E17 pph –A lot of plans are in the works but beam physics is at the top of our list 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations15

Booster Physics Workshop 11/9/2015bp | High Intensity Booster Operations16 Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements The Fermilab Proton Improvement Plan (PIP) is organizing a day and half workshop at Fermilab on November The workshop is to bring together a group of people to discuss the challenges that FNAL Booster will potential face by doubling its flux from 1.2E17 pph to 2.3E17 pph. Furthermore, the workshop will also encourage discussion about PIP II Booster era and an eventual new RCS. Participation is open to those interested or have experience in relation to these topics. Presentations are also welcomed within the constraints of the limited time allotted to the workshop. Once we have a complete list of participants and talks a more detailed list of talks and speakers will be provide.