Principal Evaluation Code of Virginia states that: Principal evaluations be consistent with the 7 Standards set forth by the state

Performance Standards for Principals 1.Instructional Leadership 2.School Climate 3.Human Resources Management 4.Organizational Management 5.Communication and Community Relations 6.Professionalism 7.Student Academic Progress

Sample Data Sources: Self-Evaluation Observations Site-Based Visits Portfolio Document log Teacher/Staff Survey Goal Setting CSIP

Code of Virginia states that: Standard 7 (Student Academic Progress) must account for at least 40% of a principal’s evaluation*. *SGPs are recommended, when available and appropriate.

Code of Virginia states that: A summative rating is required for principal evaluations.

And…  A 3- or 4-point scale is recommended for principal evaluations.

Sample Scale for Standard 1: Exemplary: The principal actively and consistently employs innovative and effective leadership strategies that maximize student academic progress and result in a shared vision of teaching and learning that reflects excellence.

Proficient: The principal fosters the success of all students by facilitating the development, communication, implementation, and evaluation of a shared vision of teaching and learning that leads to student academic progress and school improvement.

Developing/Needs Improvement: The principal inconsistently fosters the success of students by facilitating the development, communication, implementation, or evaluation of a shared vision of teaching and learning that leads to student academic progress and school improvement.

Unacceptable: The principal does not foster the success of all students by facilitating the development, communication, implementation, or evaluation of a shared vision of teaching and learning that leads to student academic progress and school improvement.

Small Group Work 1. Review pages on the of the Principal Evaluation document: ation/guidelines_ups_eval_criteria_principals.pdf 2. Discuss your initial thoughts/impressions with a small group. 3. Post any suggestions for the Principal Evaluation Committee to consider.