14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which units are you most interested in covering? Unit A –Management Science Unit B – Growth Unit C – Shape and Form Unit D – Statistics.
Advertisements

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Voting Methods Continued
Math 1010 ‘Mathematical Thought and Practice’ An active learning approach to a liberal arts mathematics course.
IMPOSSIBILITY AND MANIPULABILITY Section 9.3 and Chapter 10.
Chapter 1: Methods of Voting
The Mathematics of Elections
Mathematics The study of symbols, shapes, algorithms, sets, and patterns, using logical reasoning and quantitative calculation. Quantitative Reasoning:
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
 1. The majority criterion  2. Condorcet’s criterion  3. independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion  4. Monotonicity criterion.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
The Plurality Method The Borda Count Method
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
1 The Mathematics of Voting
§ 1.6 Rankings “Rome’s biggest contribution to American government was probably its legal system [... ] [which] would later form the basis of both the.
Voting Review Material
Fair Elections Are they possible?. Acknowledgment Many of the examples are taken from Excursions in Modern Mathematics by Peter Tannenbaum and Robert.
Voting and Math Kelsey, Ashleigh, Alex, Nick, Justin MAT 142 Final Project.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
§ 1.4 Plurality-with-Elimination (Instant Runoff Voting)
Homework Read Pages 6 – 23 Page 30: 18, 19, 24, 28, 29, 30, 33, 59, 60, 71.
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
How is this math? Mathematics is essentially the application of deductive reasoning to the study relations among patterns, structures, shapes, forms and.
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.2, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting The Paradoxes of Democracy Vote! In.
Slide 15-1 Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 2 - Slide Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
May 19, 2010Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics 12.5 Homework Solutions 27. (a) 28. (b) 29. (d) 30. (e) 53. Positive Correlation, Weak 54. Negative Correlation,
Ch Voting Preference tables E, F, G, and H are running for math club president If everyone is asked to rank their preferences, how many different.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Voting theory: application of methods that affect the outcome of an election. Sec 1: Preference Ballots and Schedules.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
1.4 The Plurality-with Elimination Method
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.1, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide Election Theory Voting Methods.
Fairness Criteria and Arrow’s Theorem Section 1.4 Animation.
Warm-Up Rank the following soft drinks according to your preference (1 being the soft drink you like best and 4 being the one you like least)  Dr. Pepper.
Voting Methods Introduction.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Flaws of Voting Methods.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.Conclusion - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting CONCLUSION Elections, Fairness,
Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system to satisfy.Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system.
My guy lost? What’s up with that….  In the 1950’s, Kenneth Arrow, a mathematical economist, proved that a method for determining election results that.
1.
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
Voting and Apportionment
Voting and Apportionment
Plurality and Borda Count Method
1 The Mathematics of Voting
1.
8.2 Voting Possibilities and Fairness Criteria
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Lecture 1: Voting and Election Math
Let’s say we have a town of 10,000 people electing a mayor using the Plurality with Elimination Voting Method. There are 4 candidates, candidate A, candidate.
Warm Up – 5/27 - Monday How many people voted in the election?
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Classwork: p.33 (27abc run off, 29ab run off, 31, 33ab run off)
Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting
5-2 Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Warm Up – 1/27 - Monday Who wins by Plurality with Elimination?
Voting Methods Introduction.
Quiz – 1/24 - Friday How many people voted in the election?
Section 14.1 Voting Methods.
Flaws of the Voting Methods
Voting Fairness.
Presentation transcript:

14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play Number of Votes st ChoiceMCDCDM 2 nd ChoiceCMCDMD 3 rd ChoiceDDMMCC

May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Amy Lewis Math Specialist IU1 Center for STEM Education

May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics 14.2 Flaws of Voting Methods Use 4 different criterion methods to determine a voting system’s fairness. Understand Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem.

First of all… I was twice a liar yesterday!

Pairwise Comparison Method The preference table is used to make a series of comparisons in which each candidate is compared to each of the other candidates. For each pair of candidates, X and Y, use the table to determine how many voters prefer X to Y and vice versa. If a majority prefer X to Y, then X receives 1 point. If a majority prefer Y to X, then Y receives 1 point. If the candidates tie, then each receives ½ point. After all comparisons have been made, the candidate receiving the most points is the winner. May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics

Pairwise Comparison Method How many comparisons do we need to make? –Antonio vs. Bob –Antonio vs. Carmen –Antonio vs. Donna –Bob vs. Carmen –Bob vs. Donna –Carmen vs. Donna May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD

Pairwise Comparison Method Bob gets 1 point. May 20, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Antonio vs. Bob

Pairwise Comparison Method Carmen gets 1 pt. May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Antonio vs. Carmen

Pairwise Comparison Method Antonio gets 1 pt. May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Antonio vs. Donna

Pairwise Comparison Method Bob gets 1 point May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Bob vs. Carmen

Pairwise Comparison Method Bob gets 1 pt. May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Bob vs. Donna

Pairwise Comparison Method Carmen gets 1 pt. May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Preference Table for the Smallville Mayoral Election Number of Votes First ChoiceADDC Second ChoiceBBBB Third ChoiceCCAA Fourth ChoiceDACD Carmen vs. Donna

Pairwise Comparison Method Who wins? –Antonio: 1 point –Bob: 3 points –Carmen: 2 points –Donna: 0 points…so sad. Bob wins! Again! My answer didn’t change, but the correct reason did… May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics

Criterion to Determine a Voting System’s Fairness The Majority Criterion –If a candidate receives a majority of first-place votes in an election, then that candidate should win the election. The Head-to-Head Criterion –If a candidate is favored when compared separately—that is, head-to-head—with every other candidate, then that candidate should win the election.

Criterion to Determine a Voting System’s Fairness The Monotonicity Criterion –If a candidate wins an election and, in a reelection, the only changes are changes that favor the candidate, then that candidate should win the reelection. The Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion –If a candidate wins an election and, in a recount, the only changes are that one or more of the other candidates are removed from the ballot, then that candidate should still win the election.

Finding a Speaker The 58 members of the Student Activity Council are meeting to elect a keynote speaker. –Bill Gates –Howard Stern –Oprah Winfrey They take a straw vote before an actual election

Finding a Speaker Preference Table for the Straw Vote # of votes st Choice WSGG 2 nd Choice GWSW 3 rd Choice SGWS Preference Table for the Second Election # of votes st Choice WSG 2 nd Choice GWS 3 rd Choice SGW Using the plurality-with-elimination method, which speaker wins each election? What criterion does this eliminate?

Another Mayoral Election # of votes st ChoiceACDD 2 nd ChoiceBBAA 3 rd ChoiceCDCB 4 th ChoiceDABC Use the pairwise comparison method to determine the winner of the election. What if B & C drop out of the race. Now who wins? What fairness criterion does this violate?

Electing a Principal Use the Borda count method to find the new principal. Who has a majority of the first-place votes? Which criterion does this violate? Preference Table for Selecting a New Principal # of Votes st Choice ABBA 2 nd Choice BCDB 3 rd Choice CDCD 4 th Choice DAAC

Voting Methods Voting Method Fairness Criteria Plurality Method Borda Count Method Plurality- with- Elimination Pairwise Comparison Majority Always satisfies May not satisfy Always satisfies Head-to-Head May not satisfy Always satisfies Monotonicity Always satisfies May not satisfy Always satisfies Irrelevant Alternatives May not satisfy

Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem It is mathematically impossible for any democratic voting system to satisfy each of the four fairness criteria. There does not exist, and will never exist, any democratic voting system that satisfies all of the fairness criteria.

May 19, 2010 Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics Homework NONE! Next Session: Monday, May 24 Last 3 sessions are next week (M, Th, F)!