G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Source Outlook High polarization strained-layer photocathodes were activated in both electron guns during the summer shutdown, with usual QE (0.2% at 850.
Advertisements

CEBAF Photoinjector: What’s new, what’s the same since HAPPEx 2004? What needs to be done? M. Poelker, HAPPEx collaboration meeting, Feb. 18, 2005.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) April 07, Notes: 1.For each BPM, the wires are: +X+, +X-, +Y+, +Y- 2.There are only two injector BPMs we are not reading:
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies June & July 2006 Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources.
PQB Photocathode Analyzing Power Study May 19, 2009.
JLab Polarized Source Happex Collaboration Meeting May 18, 2007 P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
PAVI ’06 Milos May 20, 2006 Kent Paschke – University of Massachusetts Controlling Helicity-Correlated Asymmetries in a Polarized Electron Beam Kent Paschke.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Real-time Parity Feedback John Hansknecht & Riad Suleiman April 28, 2009.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group November 10, 2008.
Hall A Parity Workshop (May 10, 2002), 1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
/SC-PAC Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Joe Grames CEBAF Operations
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Nuruzzaman ( Hampton University Group Meeting 1 st November 2011 Beamline Optics Using Beam Modulation for the Q-weak Experiment.
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Polarized Injector Status QWeak Collaboration Meeting February 1, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman,
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beam.
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
5 MeV Mott Polarimeter Progress Riad Suleiman April 10, 2012.
Probing Hadron Structure at CEBAF Using Polarized Electron Scattering M. Poelker, Jefferson Lab APS Meeting, Dallas, TX, April 2006 Structure Functions,
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group September 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility G0 Collaboration Meeting, June 18-19, 2003 Updates G0 Tiger Laser High Polarization Photocathodes Mott polarimeter.
Helicity Magnets Commissioning February 7, 2007 Hari Areti, Chao, Brad Cumbia, Jeff Dale, Richard Dickson, Joe Grames, Roger Flood, Scott Higgins, Matt.
Source Systematics PITA - type effects The importance of controlling the analyzer-axis –Two Pockels cells –Half-wave plate Position asymmetries –Lensing.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
Mott Electron Polarization Results Riad Suleiman July 10, 2013.
G 0 Project Coordinator Report Joe Grames “Big Picture” Schedule Preparations Polarized Source Injector Accelerator Hall C Accelerator Plans for 687 MeV.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility Polarized e-Source - Talking Points for PV experiments: P. Adderley, M. BastaniNejad, J. Clark, S. Covert,
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
Polarized Injector & Upgrade Schedule QWeak Collaboration Meeting November 06, 2009 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Polarized Injector Update
Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements
Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources
with help from Riad Sulieman, Arne Freyberger, and Joe Grames
A Mini-Primer for Parity Quality Beam (as seen from the Accelerator)
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05)
Parity Violation Experiments at JLEIC
Parity Quality Beam (PQB)
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
QWeak Collaboration Meeting
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Polarized Source Development Run Results
Adiabatic Damping and Parity Quality of Low Energy
Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab
Injector Studies Using Superlattice Photocathode
Helicity Magnets for PQB Feedback Helicity Magnets for PZT Booster
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
Polarized Source: Recent Activities
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
Beam Position Noise from 500 keV MBO0I06 Dipole Sensor
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Spot-Size Reduction 4/5/2017.
Injector Commissioning & Optimization
Injector for the Electron Cooler
Isotope Readiness Review Run Plans
Presentation transcript:

G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman

Presentation Outline Pockels Cell Installation (Injector) Electron Beam Studies (up to 100 KeV) Electron Beam Studies (up to 5 MeV) Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY)

Pockels Cell Installation (Injector) January 14-20, 2006 What did we accomplish? –Characterized Intensity Asymmetry (IA) Cell: λ/4, 20° Measured dependence of intensity loss on waveplate angle : 1.24%/ ° (25% at 20°) Measured dependence of intensity asymmetry on voltage : ppm/V –Aligned Pockels Cell (PC) Degree of linear polarization = 4.88% Degree of circular polarization = 99.88% Minimized x and y position differences.

Pockels Cell Installation Birefringence Effects –The presence of a gradient in the phase introduced by the PC will result in varying linear polarization across the photocathode. –Helicity correlated position differences result. Steering Effects –PC can act like voltage controlled lenses –If beam is off-center, it can be steered. –Helicity correlated position differences result

Pockels Cell Installation Results January 14-20, 2006 Steering (LP OUT) IHWP INIHWP OUTGoal ΔxΔx0.11 ± µm-0.07 ± µm < 0.1 µm ΔyΔy-0.16 ± µm 0.10 ± µm < 0.1 µm Δcharge ± 9.51 ppm ± ppm Birefringence (LP IN) IHWP INIHWP OUTGoal ΔxΔx7.39 ± µm ± µm < 6 µm ΔyΔy3.88 ± µm ± µm < 6 µm Δcharge1.56E4 ± 157 ppm -2.54E4 ± 169 ppm Electrical Pickup ΔxΔx0.008 ± µm ΔyΔy ± µm Δcharge0.043 ± 1.24 ppm InjectorHappex ΔxΔx< 0.3 µm ΔyΔy Δcharge w/ photocathode 3X larger in injector w/ photocathode 20X smaller in injector

Electron Beam Studies (up to 100 KeV) January 28, 2006 (80 μA, Wien = 0°) IHWP OUT IHWP IN RHWP = 0° -8.6 ppm/V Slope is too small. Move to a better angle.

Electron Beam Studies (up to 100 KeV) January 28, 2006 (80 μA, Wien = 0°)

IHWP OUT IHWP IN RHWP = 120° 14.3 ppm/V Slope is better.

Electron Beam Studies (up to 100 KeV) January 28, 2006 (80 μA, Wien = 0°) Summary –All of the position differences are less than 0.3 um. –Charge asymmetry can easily be controlled with the size of the PITA slope. Intensity Asymmetry (IA) Cell –Measured dependence of intensity asymmetry on voltage : ppm/V

Electron Beam Studies (up to 5 MeV) February 1, 2006 (20 μA,Wien = 90°) IHWP OUT IHWP IN RHWP = 120° ppm/V

Electron Beam Studies (up to 5 MeV) February 1, 2006 (20 μA, Wien = 90°) Summary –Except for a few BPMs (Δy, IHWP = IN, KeV region), all of the position differences are less than 0.3 um. –Charge asymmetry can easily be controlled with the size of the PITA slope.

Friday, February 3, 2005 Hall C laser unlocked. Matt and John did their best to put the Hall C beam back on the original line through the pockels cell and to the photocathode. We may see different helicity correlated asymmetries.

Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY) February 3, 2006 (687 MeV,10 μA, before Chao’s accelerator matching ) IHWP OUT

Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY) February 3, 2006 (687 MeV,10 μA, before Chao’s accelerator matching ) Helicity Magnet 1 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 2 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 3 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 1 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C

Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY) February 5, 2006 (687 MeV, 20 μA, after Chao’s accelerator matching)

IHWP IN IHWP OUT RHWP = 20° -15 ppm/V RHWP = 160° -20 ppm/V

Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY) February 5, 2006 (687 MeV, 20 μA, after Chao’s accelerator matching) Helicity Magnet 1 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 2 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 3 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C Helicity Magnet 4 Acharge (ppm/DAC) Dx (nm/DAC) Dy (nm/DAC) Dr (nm/DAC) IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0L IPM0R C C

Electron Beam Studies (up to BSY) February 5, 2006 (687 MeV, 20 μA, after Chao’s accelerator matching) Summary –We see different helicity correlated asymmetries. –Steering offset ~0.4 um –Need to re-align Pockels Cell before run