Dr. Fernando de Toro Metafiction The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction

Metafiction  What is Metafiction?  An extreme self-consciousness about language, literary form and the act of writing fictions.  A pervasive insecurity about the relationship about fiction to reality.  A parodic, playful excessive or deceptively naïve style of writing.

Metafiction  Metafiction is a term given to fictional writing which self-consciously and systematically draws attention to its status as an artefact in order to pose questions about the relationship between fiction and reality.  Over the last thirty years, novelists have tended to become much more aware of the theoretical issues involved in constructing fictions.  In consequence, their novels have tended to embody dimensions of self-reflexivity and formal uncertainty.

Metafiction  What connects not only this reflexion but also all of the very different writers whom one could refer to as broadly ‘metafictional’, is that they all explore a theory of fiction through the practice of writing fiction.  If our knowledge of this world is now seen to be mediated through language, then literary fiction (worlds constructed entirely of language) becomes a useful model for learning about the construction of ‘reality’ itself.  The present increased awareness of ‘meta’ levels of discourse and experience is partly a consequence of an increased social and cultural self-consciousness.

Metafiction  Beyond this, however, it also reflects a greater awareness within contemporary culture of the function of language in constructing and maintaining our sense of everyday ‘reality’.  The simple notion that language passively reflects a coherent, meaningful and ‘objective’ world is no longer tenable.  Language is an independent, self-contained system which generates its own ‘meanings’.

Metafiction  In novelistic practice, this results in writing which consistently displays its conventionality, which explicitly and overtly lays bare its condition of artifice, and which thereby explores the problematic relationship between life and fiction.  Metafiction may concern itself, then, with particular conventions of the novel, to display the process of their construction. For example, Foe, Flaubert’s Parrot, Places far from Ellesmere, The Prowler, etc.

Metafiction  Metafiction and the novel tradition  I would argue that metafictional practice has become particularly prominent in the fiction of the last thirty years.  However, to draw exclusively on contemporary fiction would be misleading, for, although the term ‘metafiction’ might be new, the practice is as old (if not older) than the novel itself (Cervantes, XVII and Stern, XVIII).  Metafictional novels tend to be constructed on the principle of a fundamental and sustained opposition: the construction of a fictional illusion (as in traditional realism) and the laying bare of that illusion.

Metafiction  In other words, the lowest common denominator of metafiction is simultaneously to create a fiction and to make a statement about the creation of that fiction.  The two processes are held together in a formal tension which breaks down the distinctions between ‘creation’ and ‘criticism’ and merges them into the concepts of ‘interpretation’ and ‘deconstruction’. 

Metafiction  Metafiction and the contemporary avant-garde  Literary texts tended to function by preserving a balance between the unfamiliar (the innovatory) and the familiar (the conventional or traditional), but postmodern fiction does away even with this distinction.

Metafiction  Both are necessary because some degree of redundancy is essential for any message to be committed to memory.  Redundancy is provided for in literary texts through the presence of familiar conventions.  Experimental fiction of the aleatory variety eschews such redundancy by simply ignoring the conventions of literary tradition.  Such texts set out to resists the normal processes of reading, memory and understanding, but without redundancy, texts are read and forgotten.

Metafiction  They cannot unite to form a literary ‘movement’ because they exist only at the moment of reading, and this is a trade mark of postmodernity.   Aleatory writing might imitate the experience of living in the contemporary world, but it fails to offer any of the comfort traditionally supplied by literary fiction through a ‘sense of an ending’.

Metafiction  Metafiction, however, offers both innovation and familiarity through the individual reworking and undermining of familiar conventions.  Many times metafiction functions to defamiliarize past structures by setting up various counter-techniques to undermine the authority of the omniscient author, of the closure ending, of the definitive interpretation.

Metafiction  Metafiction explicitly lays bare the conventions of realism; it does not ignore or abandon them (In Modernity).  Metafiction, then, does not abandon ‘the real world’ for the narcissistic pleasures of the imagination (In Modernity).  What it does is to re-examine the conventions of realism in order to discover –through its own self reflexion – a fictional form that is culturally relevant and comprehensible to contemporary readers.

Metafiction  In showing us how literary fiction creates its imaginary worlds, metafiction helps us to understand how the reality we live day by day is similarly constructed, similarly ‘written’.  ‘Metafiction’ is thus an elastic term which covers a wide range of fictions.