Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC Habitats Directive (With focus on the marine environment) MARCOS Kick off meeting Åsa Andersson, February 2007.
Advertisements

The European Biodiversity Action Plan - State of Play and prospects after 2010 EPF 18 March 2009 Anne Teller, DG ENV.B2.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
European Commission Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in the EU today – Business & Biodiversity Alexandra Vakrou, EC, DG Environment IEF European Roundtable.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
TIDE & Natura 2000: A partnership for sustainable tidal river development? Antwerp, 18 February 2010 François Kremer European Commission DG Environment,
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Natura EU ambitions for a coherent ecological network State of Play and Challenges Saskia Richartz Institute for European Environmental Policy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Prof. Dr. G. Van Hoorick Faculty of Law – Department of Administrative and Environmental Law pag. 1 COMPENSATORY MEASURES IN EUROPEAN NATURE CONSERVATION.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
Commission Guidance on inland waterway development in the context of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD.
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
FOR MANAGING BIODIVERSITY AND SPECIAL PLACES
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
EEA Biodiversity, Agriculture and Forest work in 2010 and beyond EEA/NRC Agriculture Meeting 2010 Ivone Pereira Martins, HoG – Biodiversity, Agriculture.
Connectivity between protected areas as an adaptation strategy for biodiversity conservation An Cliquet - Ghent University Kris Decleer – Research Institute.
COMMISSION NOTE ON THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACs) Habitats Committee Brussels, 13 May 2011.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Developing conservation objectives © L. Campbell.
Platform Meeting Rudbøl, Denmark Olaf G. Christiani, DFNA.
REPORTING PURSUANT TO ART. 17 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE
Expert Group on the Birds and Habitats Directives (NADEG)
Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU
Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU
Marine Expert Group meeting Brussels, 6 November 2015
Natura 2000 management planning in Spain: Preliminary remarks
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Last developments of report formats
Constance von Briskorn BIO by Deloitte 13-14th October 2014
Reporting – Article 17 Habitats Committee, 16 October 2007
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality
Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
Conservation objectives: The favourable conservation status
Progress in the designation of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)
Technical guidance in relation to the non-energy extractive industry
Assessment of Conservation Status for Large Carnivores
Links with Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Expert meeting on marine Natura 2000 sites
Natura 2000 and river basin management
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Expert group on management of Natura 2000
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Analysis of the notification of compensatory measures
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Progress in the designation of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)
The New Biogeographic Process General info – December 2011
Habitats Committee Brussels, 15 November 2010
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Frequently asked questions Part I: Objectives and differences in scope of the WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and.
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
EU biodiversity strategy to Target 1
Assessment scales and aggregation
Towards a prioritised action framework for financing Natura 2000
Update on work of Natura 2000 management group
Natura 2000 & Article 17 databases: their potential use in the frame of the Prioritised Action Framework (PAF) Frank Vassen, Unit D3 – nature conservation,
COMMISSION NOTE ON THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACs) Habitats Committee Brussels, 26 April 2012.
Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration
Presentation transcript:

Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November

Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 Legal context In the preamble to the Habitats Directive it is stated: "..it is appropriate, in each area designated, to implement the necessary measures having regard to the conservation objectives pursued" “.. an appropriate assessment must be made of any plan or programme likely to have a significant effect on the conservation objectives of a site which has been designated or is designated in future”

Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 Legal context - continued Article 4.4 Habitats Directive: “once a site of Community importance has been adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 2, the Member State concerned shall designate that site as a special area of conservation as soon as possible and within six years at most, establishing priorities in the light of the importance of the sites for the maintenance or restoration, at a favourable conservation status, of a natural habitat type in Annex I or a species in Annex II and for the coherence of Natura 2000, and in the light of the threats of degradation or destruction to which those sites are exposed”.

Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 Legal context - continued Article 6.1: "for special areas of conservation, Member States shall establish the necessary conservation measures …which correspond to the ecological requirements of the natural habitat types in Annex I and the species in Annex II present on the sites.“ Article 6.3: "Any plan or project…shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives..”

The ultimate conservation objective The ultimate conservation objective of the Habitats Directive is to ensure that the species and habitat types covered achieve ‘favourable conservation status’ (FCS).

Conservation objectives The overall objective of achieving FCS can only be considered at an appropriate level, such as for example the national or the biogeographical level. This general objective needs to be translated into site level conservation objectives which define the conservation targets to be achieved within the respective sites in order to optimise their contribution to achieving FCS at the national, biogeographical or European level.

Conservation objectives - continued Site level conservation objectives define what constitutes the target status of each species and habitat for which a site has been designated that should be met in the respective site in order to meet the ecological requirements of these species or habitat types and ultimately to achieve FCS at the national biogeographical level and eventually also at higher levels. Therefore identifying the contribution of a site to the achievement of a FCS for the habitats and species concerned at the national biogeographical level can provide the basis for setting of site level conservation objectives.

Member States designate a site as a special area of conservation Member States establishing priorities in the light of the importance of the respective site for the maintenance or restoration, at a favourable conservation status at the national biogeographical level of the habitat types and species of Community interest present on the site and for the coherence of Natura 2000, and in the light of the threats of degradation or destruction to which the site is exposed. Conservation objectives should reflect these priorities. Conservation objectives - continued

Conservation objectives are a set of specified targets to be met at the site level in order to make sure that the site contributes in an optimal way to achieving FCS. Conservation measures are the actual mechanisms and actions to be put in place to achieve site level conservation objectives. Measures are essentially established at the local/site level, but they can also be designed at the regional or national level, including areas that are not part of the Natura 2000 network. Conservation objectives versus conservation measures

When are conservation objectives to be established? It is clear from the text of the Habitats Directive that priorities should be established by the time of SAC designation at the latest. The conservation objectives reflect these priorities. They are directly linked to the designation and management of the SAC. They constitute a key aspect of the site management. Conservation objectives must be available when establishing the necessary conservation measures according to Article 6.1. When Member States apply Art. 6.3 they must also refer to the site’s conservation objectives. © Lawrence Walter-Jones

Conservation measures must be established for all species and habitat types of both the Habitats and Birds Directives that are significantly present on a site (i.e. all species having a significant population size and density = category A, B or C) and all habitat types having an excellent (A), good (B) or significant (C) representativity) The information in the Natura 2000 standard data form provides the starting point for this. What elements need to be considered in setting conservation objectives and measures?

The Habitats Directive does not set a date for the attainment of favourable conservation status at the national level. To be credible the conservation measures must be undertaken within as short a time frame as possible, having regard to the urgency and importance of the measures. It is important to set a timeline to review the site level conservation objectives in order to check appropriateness, measurability and implementation. When are conservation objectives to be achieved?

Conservation priorities are a determination of the most important species/habitats to take action for and/or most important measures to be taken. Priority conservation objectives are the most urgent targets to be achieved at site level or at higher levels in order to make sure that the overall goal of FCS can be achieved. Priority conservation measures are the most urgent actions that need to be taken in order to make sure that conservation objectives can be achieved. Priorities can be can be established at different levels (EU, biogeographical level, national, regional, local/site level). Setting priorities

How to take into account economic, social and cultural requirements as required by Article 2.3 of the Habitats Directive How to recognise the dynamic nature of sites and of their constituent species and habitat type How to define the relative contribution of different sites in achieving FCS at the national or higher level for different species and habitat types How to deal with dynamic situations and new development in sites, eg. newly arriving species, disappearance of species from sites – what are the consequences and how can conservation objectives take account of such situations How to monitor and review progress towards achievement site level conservation objectives, refining objectives in the light of experience, and the links to monitoring under Article 17 of the Directive. Other relevant issues to consider include: