1© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. ViPR DR Requirement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
Advertisements

Information Technology Disaster Recovery Awareness Program.
© 2009 VMware Inc. All rights reserved Confidential Overview: vCenter Server Heartbeat Q
Business Continuity Section 3(chapter 8) BC:ISMDR:BEIT:VIII:chap8:Madhu N PIIT1.
1© Copyright 2013 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RECOVERPOINT FAMILY Protecting Your Data.
1 Disaster Recovery “Protecting City Data” Ron Bergman First Deputy Commissioner Gregory Neuhaus Assistant Commissioner THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
An Approach to Secure Cloud Computing Architectures By Y. Serge Joseph FAU security Group February 24th, 2011.
© 2009 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Introduction to Business Continuity Module 3.1.
1 RMS Workshop Retail Systems Disaster Recovery ERCOT May 6 th, 2014.
1© Copyright 2013 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC APPSYNC Simple, SLA-driven, self-service application protection for EMC VNX.
VMware vCenter Server Heartbeat – Overview. Why is VMware vCenter Availability Important? What Needs to be Protected? Protecting vCenter Server with vCenter.
1 D2D Data Protection Solution Evaluation Project #552.
June 23rd, 2009Inflectra Proprietary InformationPage: 1 SpiraTest/Plan/Team Deployment Considerations How to deploy for high-availability and strategies.
1 © Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RecoverPoint/Cluster Enabler for Microsoft Failover Cluster.
DR, Off-Site Backups and More! What are my options today? Ben PiersonSystems Engineer NW
Module – 12 Remote Replication
4/17/2017 © 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks.
1© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. CUSTOMER REFERENCES.
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER FIVE INFRASTRUCTURES: SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES CHAPTER.
1© Copyright 2011 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RECOVERPOINT/ CLUSTER ENABLER FOR MICROSOFT FAILOVER CLUSTER.
1© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MICROSOFT APPLICATIONS IN THE PRIVATE CLOUD EMC Symmetrix VMAX 10K, EMC.
1© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. November 2013 Oracle Continuous Availability – Technical Overview.
1© Copyright 2013 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. ESI SCO Integration Pack Alix Sensale Irene Yu.
SharePoint Business Continuity Management with SQL Server AlwaysOn
John Graham – STRATEGIC Information Group Steve Lamb - QAD Disaster Recovery Planning MMUG Spring 2013 March 19, 2013 Cleveland, OH 03/19/2013MMUG Cleveland.
1 © Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RecoverPoint One way to protect everything you have…better.
Building Highly Available Systems with SQL Server™ 2005 Robert Rea Brandon Consulting.
1© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. SAP Data Protection with EMC Customer Presentation April 2014.
DB-12: Achieving High Availability with Clusters and OpenEdge® Replication Combining the two technologies Hugo Loera Chávez Senior Tech Support Engineer.
1© Copyright 2013 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC and Microsoft SharePoint Server Data Protection Name Title Date.
Chapter 10 : Designing a SQL Server 2005 Solution for High Availability MCITP Administrator: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Database Server Infrastructure Design.
IT Business Continuity Briefing March 3,  Incident Overview  Improving the power posture of the Primary Data Center  STAGEnet Redundancy  Telephone.
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Chapter 8 Part 2 Pages 914 to 945.
1© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. ORACLE CONTINUOUS AVAILABILITY NOVEMBER 2014.
© Novell, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 PlateSpin Protect Virtualize your Disaster Recovery.
1 EMC CONFIDENTIAL—INTERNAL USE ONLY EMC’s End-to-End Capabilities for Microsoft EMC helps you successfully plan, design, deploy and manage your Microsoft.
Case study Active –Active DC
©2006 Merge eMed. All Rights Reserved. Energize Your Workflow 2006 User Group Meeting May 7-9, 2006 Disaster Recovery Michael Leonard.
Storage Trends: DoITT Enterprise Storage Gregory Neuhaus – Assistant Commissioner: Enterprise Systems Matthew Sims – Director of Critical Infrastructure.
Marty Sanders, VP of Americas Economic Benefits of Deploying Disruptive Hyperconvergence Technology September 2015.
Module 13 Implementing Business Continuity. Module Overview Protecting and Recovering Content Working with Backup and Restore for Disaster Recovery Implementing.
Virtualization for Disaster Recovery Panel Discussion May 19, 2010 Ed Walsh EMC vSpecialist EMC Corporation Cell Chris Fox.
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Planning.
Availability on Demand (Business Continuity and DR, and more…)
OSIsoft High Availability PI Replication
1© Copyright 2015 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved.
Business Continuity Overview
1© Copyright 2013 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. SAP Data Center Consolidation Mediaprint moves to active-active virtualized data centers Challenge.
High Availability in DB2 Nishant Sinha
Module 7: SQL Server Special Considerations. Overview SQL Server High Availability Unicode.
Site Recovery Manager Disaster Recovery for ViPR-Managed Storage
2006 Infrastructure Projects Four Themes: Storage – room to grow Security – reacting to threats Virtual Systems – increased efficiency Service Management.
System Center Data Protection Manager 2012 Boris Ulík | TSP | Microsoft Slovakia.
1 Delivering on the Promise of a Virtualized Dynamic Data Center Hosted by GTSI and Cisco.
SQL Server 2012: AlwaysOn HA and DR Design Patterns, and Lessons Learned from Early Customer Deployments Sanjay Mishra SQLCAT.
Log Shipping, Mirroring, Replication and Clustering Which should I use? That depends on a few questions we must ask the user. We will go over these questions.
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Leveraging VMware to implement Disaster Recovery at LANL Anil Karmel Technical Staff Member
AlwaysOn In SQL Server 2012 Fadi Abdulwahab – SharePoint Administrator - 4/2013
OSIsoft High Availability PI Replication Colin Breck, PI Server Team Dave Oda, PI SDK Team.
Azure Site Recovery For Hyper-V, VMware, and Physical Environments
Planning for Application Recovery
Atlantis USX Enhancements
Server Upgrade HA/DR Integration
Microsoft Azure P wer Lunch
Planning High Availability and Disaster Recovery
Storage Trends: DoITT Enterprise Storage
SpiraTest/Plan/Team Deployment Considerations
Move your data to the cloud with Azure and {Partner Company Name}
PerformanceBridge Application Suite and Practice 2.0 IT Specifications
Redefinition of Business Continuity Strategies using Cloud Native Enterprise Architectures Frank Stienhans, CTO August 2016.
Presentation transcript:

1© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. ViPR DR Requirement

2© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Scope of ViPR DR Procedure DR scenarios focused on ViPR App Ability to resume all normal ViPR use cases: – In case of loss of primary ViPR instance – Secondary instance of ViPR needs to be instantiated on different hardware/data center – For arrays/hosts/switches that are still available/accessible to ViPR Ability to simulate and test ViPR DR scenario Unavailability scenarios documented in subsequent slides Not in Scope: – DR of application using storage provisioned by ViPR

3© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. DISTRIBUTED DATABASE Physical Storage Minority node down; less than half ViPR VMs are corrupted/deleted 1a. ViPR Reduced redundancy X Desired State: - ViPR appliance redundancy can be brought back to the original state Documented process? VMware vApp-Shared storage -No doc on repair process -Need investigation on partial data loss VMware vApp - With SRM -NA HyperV-Repair process need to document -Working on minority node repair or recovery VMware No vApp-Same as above

4© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. DISTRIBUTED DATABASE Physical Storage Majority node failure 1. Reduced redundancy X Desired State: - ViPR appliance redundancy can be brought back to the original state Documented process? VMware vApp-No repair process today (future) -Backup and restore process applies. VMware vApp - With SRM -NA HyperV-Backup and restore process applies. VMware No vApp-Same as above X

5© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. DISTRIBUTED DATABASE Physical Storage X 2. All ViPR nodes corrupted/HW unavailable Desired State -ViPR data is recovered. -Provisioning through ViPR can be resumed quickly -Customer should be able to switch ViPR back without losing any new configuration Documented process? VMware vApp-Backup and restore process applies VMware vApp - With SRM -NA HyperV-Backup and restore process applies VMware No vApp-Backup and restore process applies Ability to test this scenario? -Yes. Documentation needed Managed resources are still up and running

6© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 3a. Disaster at Site 1 hosting ViPR No ViPR managed storage replication between sites (No RP/SRDF/VPLEX) Desired State -ViPR instance on another site can be brought up quickly -Provisioning for site 2…site n can resume through ViPR. -No/Limited loss of ViPR configuration data -Once site 1 is restored, ViPR can be moved back to site 1 Documented process? VMware vApp -With SRM (Jedi) -Use Vmware SRM to bring up ghost instances -Different IP support needed -Need to run test under load -Official doc needed (make sure ports are open) VMware vApp -Without SRM (Jedi) -Backup can be shipped -Different IP support needed -Official doc needed HyperV (Jedi)-Backup option Same as above VMware No vApp Jedi? -Same as above -Separate testing is required Ability to test this scenario -Yes Site 1 Site 2Site n X

7© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 3b. Disaster at Site 1 hosting ViPR ViPR managed storage replication between sites (RP/SRDF/VPLEX) Desired State -ViPR should be able to perform storage continuity operations through another site -Admin can use ViPR to change state of target devices to source -ViPR understands the change in internal state (Operating in failover mode/metropoint) if Admin changes state outside ViPR -Provisioning for site 2…site n can resume through ViPR. -No/Limited loss of ViPR configuration data -Once site 1 is restored, ViPR can be moved back to site 1 Documented process? VMware vApp w SRM-RPO/RTO objectives can be met -making R2 device available workflow not in ViPR VMware vApp w/o SRMBackup and restore will not meet RPO/RTO requirements HyperV VMware No vApp Ability to test this scenario Site 1 Site 2 RP/SRDF/VPLEX X ViPR interacting with SMI-S on site 1 (SMI-S DR needs to be in place) - Need to identify limitation ( work with Evgeny) - ViPR working with SRDF/RP and SRM

8© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Other Considerations Customer RTO for ViPR – Depends on how important customer perceives ViPR to be. – For Bank of America – any app that concerns storage management is Tier 1 (out of 6 total). Tiers 0-4 require a DR strategy and a Tape Backup strategy. Tier0 – sub-minute, Tier1 – approx. 10 mins is OK Tier2 – 1 or 2 hrs is OK, etc.

9© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved.

10© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Situation Enterprise customers have a very well established DR strategy which is usually tested a few times every quarter There is a gap in the customer’s DR strategy when they deploy ViPR in their environment Even though ViPR is only a control path product it is still makes for disconnected DR strategy for customers as they would have to fall back to element managers to manage their infrastructure in the eventuality of a DR

11© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Customer Ask ViPR product team provides a well qualified/validated DR strategy which the customers can incorporate in their overall DR playbooks As most of our customers currently run ViPR as a vAPP, the ask is predominantly from a VMware perspective This has quickly becoming a blocker for every enterprise customer (Bank of America, JPMC etc.) as this puts their Datacenter DR strategy at risk (i.e. incomplete)

12© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. The “right” long term solution ViPR’s DR strategy should be hypervisor agnostic (i.e. VMware, Hyper-v, KVM) as we will have support for all of these by the end of the year One way to accomplish that would be to have a truly federated ViPR solution –Can this potentially be accomplished by the end of the year? Since this is a long term goal which could potentially be a sizeable engineering effort we need to think of a short term solution to address customer concerns

13© Copyright 2014 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Requirements Since the short term ask is from a VMware perspective –VMware SRM is a viable option –Need to have a good mix of platforms for the qualification testing (i.e. VMAX, VNX, VPLEX, XtremIO etc.) –We need to fully qualify this offering for all different DR scenarios (common customer DR exercises, losing entire production site etc.) –Identify any gaps –Once qualified, create a white paper articulating ViPR’s DR solution offering and how it fits with customer’s overall DR strategy –PM’s can vet the solution with customers during the qualification stages to identify concerns or just solicit feedback