Between Public and Private Mobility: Implications for Travel Behavior February 17, 2016 Susan Shaheen Adjunct Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Car Sharing.  History  Types  Demographics  Dedicated Model / B2B  Ride Matching  Total Transportation Solution 2.
Advertisements

Carsharing and Fractional Ownership Susan Shaheen, Ph.D. Lecturer and Co-Director, University of California, Berkeley SAP Workshop February 20, 2013.
Resetting the measurement table CTR Board Meeting March 28, 2014 WSDOT Staff Evaluating a New CTR Program.
Workshop on Transportation Corridor Evaluation With a focus on Economic and Community Development.
Modeling and Forecasting Implications of Driverless Cars
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
Transportation’s share of our carbon footprint Transportation is growing faster than other sectors, accounted for half the growth in emissions from
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Implications on Land Use from Automated or Connected Vehicles Steven E. Polzin,
MEASURING PERFORMANCE, DELIVERING OUTCOMES Regional Measures of Sustainability March 12, 2014 Allison Brooks Director, Bay Area Joint Policy Committee.
Restricted - Confidential Information © GSM Association 2014 All GSMA meetings are conducted in full compliance with the GSMA’s anti-trust compliance policy.
Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. Honda Distinguished Scholar Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways & ITS-Davis, University of California, Berkeley & Davis.
Tony Dutzik, Senior Policy Analyst, Frontier Group Presentation to the ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit 29 October 2013.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Enhancing the Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Access and Use of Targeted Transportation Funds August 17, 2015.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Emerging Trends: The Demographics and Needs of Seniors Richard Weiner Nelson/Nygaard Grady Tarbutton Washoe.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Presented by Connie Soper, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates October 14, 2011 NATIONAL CAPITAL.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
CalACT Conference California Mobility Management Project JARC/New Freedom Grants San Diego, California March 19, 2009 California Alliance of Information.
Automated Vehicles: The technology that will change our mobility experience Ryan Lanyon Program Manager, Transportation Services City Toronto ACT Canada.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
1 TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program University of California, Berkeley Jane Lappin Volpe National.
1 Industry Plenary and Round Table 16 th World Congress Stockholm 2009 Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Francisco.
Promoting Clean Vehicles in a Sustainable South Bay The Local Use Vehicle Demonstration Program June 2011.
1 The Future of Transportation: What have we been doing? Where should we be going? Lisa Aultman-Hall, Professor and Director Transportation Research Center.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
San Mateo County Senior Mobility Action Plan CalACT Autumn Conference Monterey, CA October 6, 2005.
M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N TIP Investment Analysis Presentation to the FTIP Workshop for the 2013 TIP.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Transformation Technologies in Transportation Mark R. Norman, P.E. Director, TRB Program Development & Strategic Initiatives.
Dynamic Ridesharing: An Exploration of the Potential for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas Reductions Caroline Rodier, Ph.D. Associate Director,
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
SB375 – Smart Growth, Public Health & Equity Ann C. Chan Director, California Programs Urban Habitat – SB375 Panel Boards and Commissions Leadership Institute.
Investigation of Potential Transportation Alternatives for an Aging Population Beverly Ward, PhD, MPA (University of South Florida) Mike Neidhart, PhD,
Between Public and Private Mobility: The Rise of Technology-Enabled Transportation Services TRB Special Report 319.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Putting Taxis and TNCs in Context Considerations for the Public Sector 17 February 2016 Brian D. Taylor, PhD, FAICP Professor of Urban Planning Director,
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
Implications for the Taxi Industry and Riders Bruce Schaller Principal, Schaller Consulting February 17, 2016 California Senate Oversight Hearing.
Nothing But the Facts About Green Building, Density, and Climate Change.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
I&A + Transportation= Access What Aging and Disability Resource Centers Can Do ADRC TAE Call, February 15, 2007 Lynnda Bassham Lower Savannah Council of.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS Chapter 28 Monetary Policy and Bank Regulation PowerPoint Image Slideshow.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Mobility Coordination Center Concept
Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning 2016 Sustainability & Public Transportation Workshop Joe Iacobucci Director of Transit & Shared.
Planning for Autonomous Vehicles AMPO Annual Conference, October 2016
The BART System Map.
Ubiquitous Mobility for Portland
Optimizing Outcomes for Equitable, Efficient, Safe, and Green Mobility
How Transit Agencies Can Plan for Driverless Cars
and Transportation Impacts
Infrastructure funding challenges in the sharing economy
Can your bus service Uber? Twitter: AskAdamCohen
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Ubiquitous Mobility for Portland
The Business of Public Transportation
Techniques for Assessing the Transportation Gaps of Environmental Justice Populations Stephen Mattingly1, Ziaur Rahman1, Noelle Fields2, Courtney Cronley2,
FINANCING ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Transit Innovation 18th Biennial State Programs Meeting and
Session 2C: Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)
Presentation transcript:

Between Public and Private Mobility: Implications for Travel Behavior February 17, 2016 Susan Shaheen Adjunct Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Co-Director, Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

Overview Some key study observations Equity and access Opportunities What does the future hold? Acknowledgements

Key Observations Shared services are not new (e.g., carpooling) Information technology enables matching, information and payment exchange, and scale in sharing economy Can increase safety for drivers and passengers Ecosystem of services is evolving rapidly Blurring lines (e.g., ridesharing and TNCs) New entrants Notable investment

Key Observations (cont’d) Impacts of emerging services are uncertain Already transformative for a few, could be transformative for many Carsharing and bikesharing: experience suggests reduced auto ownership, travel, and emissions Continued expansion of services has potentially important implications for location preferences of households and firms, travel patterns, and public transit use in future

Over The Long Run… Could change the nature of mobility, which could ultimately increase or decrease overall vehicle travel Increase Shifting walk and public transit trips to TNCs Sharing more rides and filling empty seats (potential for collectively greater impacts) Energy efficiency Decrease Allowing people to purchase transportation by the trip rather than buying vehicles VMT and GHGs

A Key Behavioral Question If consumers increase use of mobility services, will they become more accustomed to considering the marginal costs of each trip, possibly making fewer discretionary trips and owning fewer vehicles or could this lead to more travel and sprawl?

Equity and Access Increasingly central role of smartphone apps means a growing income and digital divide ~8% of U.S. household lack bank accounts 36% of Americans currently do not own smartphones Diverging views on accessibility quality associated with emerging services Taxis sometimes better equipped to serve disabled, older, and low-income travelers (e.g., wheelchairs and without bank accounts)

Opportunities Opportunities for new services and players Paratransit, Suburbs, Rural areas, First-mile and last-mile to public transit Potential to leverage new strengths and features of services (e.g., lower costs through shared rides) Partnership opportunities need to be explored between public and private sectors

Opportunities (cont’d) Data and research understanding key to future policy development, evaluation, and evolution New methodologies needed for incorporating shared and automated services into transportation planning Information clearinghouse recommended to capture and disseminate data for use in travel behavior research

What Does the Future Hold? How might auto ownership and use change with growing suite of shared services? How might services impact land use, location decisions, and public transit use? How will automated vehicle technologies impact mobility and shared services? How do we ensure equity and access? What types of policies can maximize social and environmental benefits in the future?

Acknowledgements Brian Taylor, UCLA (Chair) Ryan Chin, MIT Melanie Crotty, San Francisco Bay Area MTC Jennifer Dill, Portland State University Lester Hoel, University of Virginia Michael Manville, Cornell University Katherine Kortum, TRB (Study Director) Steve Polzin, University of South Florida Bruce Schaller, Consultant Susan Shaheen, UC Berkeley Daniel Sperling, UC Davis Marzia Zafar, California Public Utilities Commission Susan Zielinski, University of Michigan Stephen Godwin, TRB