ESRC Research Methods Festival 2008 1 st July 2008 Exploring service user participation in the systematic review process Sarah Carr, Research Analyst,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C4EO Support for Regional Developments Gill Taylor Regional Associate 1.
Advertisements

Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
Mixed methods synthesis ESRC Methods Festival 2006 James Thomas Institute of Education, University of London.
The affordances of mobile learning for an undergraduate nursing program: A design-based study Juliana Joan Willemse.
Getting evidence into policy and practice: a framework for KT&E Rebecca Armstrong Cochrane Health Promotion & Public Health Field.
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Protocol Development.
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
Morag Ferguson and Susan Shandley Educational Projects Managers
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
Delivering Guidance in a Group Setting: optimising the potential for personal learning and development in a group context Jane Westergaard Senior Lecturer.
Student Learning Development, TCD1 Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development Trinity College Dublin.
Putting Research Evidence to Work Research Seminar 14 th January 2009.
Undertaking Systematic Literature Reviews By Dr. Luke Pittaway Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development.
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Evidencing the outcomes of professional education: a perspective from social work Elaine Sharland, Professor of Social Work Research on behalf of Suzy.
At the end of this module, participants should have a better understanding of the following : Elements of Gender Mainstreaming Basics of Gender Analysis.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
International Seminar SCIE’s approach to good practice 15 April 2009 Amanda Edwards, Deputy Chief Executive Patricia Kearney, Head of Children’s Services.
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Evidence based implementation for quality and health promotion in hospitals Professor Jos Kleijnen Director Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University.
National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness National Learning Disability Review Function Options Appraisal Report.
Adult Care and Support Commissioning Strategies Sarah Mc Bride - Head of Commissioning, Performance and Improvement Ann Hughes – Acting Senior.
Results  81 papers were reviewed 55 papers psychoeducational interventions 19 papers educational interventions 14 papers multicomponent interventions.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Systematic Reviews.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
Follow How to integrate evidence into practice and policy: Knowledge translation resources for practitioners with limited.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
SSRG Annual Workshop 2008 SCIE’s role in making a difference Julie Jones Chief Executive, SCIE 9 April 2008.
What Works Clearinghouse Susan Sanchez Institute of Education Sciences.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
(1) Systematic reviews that configure and aggregate data to answer all research questions David Gough Systematic Reviews for Complicated and Complex Questions,
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
DESTINATION MEASURES AND RAISING THE PARTICATION AGE REQUIREMENTS Simon Gentry Business Manager, Services for Young People, Education.
Parental Mental Health and Child Welfare An introduction to the SCIE guide recommendations Amanda Edwards Deputy Chief Executive, SCIE 7 th July 2009.
Developing a Review Protocol. 1. Title Registration 2. Protocol 3. Complete Review Components of the C2 Review Process.
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development
SCIE Conference Welcome Allan Bowman Chair of SCIE.
REPRESENTING CONTEXT IN AN ARCHIVE OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS PROJECT ACTIVITIES The project team canvassed opinion across the.
Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.
REPRESENTING CONTEXT IN AN ARCHIVE OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS The project has constructed a permanent archive of significant.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Quality Standards for Supported Employment Wednesday 09 November 2005 NIUSE Facilitators:- Teresa Hazzard & Heather Logan.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
The following slides were presented at a meeting of potential editors and methods advisors for the proposed Cochrane review group in February The.
Let Quality Guide Quality Evaluation Recent Trends Implemented in the Middle East.
Horizon 2020 Ian Devine European Advisor – UK Research Office University of Manchester, 11 September 2014.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Conferenceboard.ca Aligning, Foreseeing, and Optimizing HTA in Canada 2016 CADTH Symposium April 12, 2016 Dr. Gabriela Prada Director, Health Innovation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Patient and Public Involvement: Supporting a future of better research Isabelle Abbey-Vital, Research Involvement Officer.
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
CILIP Performance Framework – Business metrics & KPI
This is a presentation template which can be used and adapted to communicate key introductory messages and stimulate discussion about the personalisation.
Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning
MUHC Innovation Model.
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
RESPONDING TO STUDENT VOICE: PRINCIPLES OF PRACTICE
Enhancing Learning in Practice
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Presentation transcript:

ESRC Research Methods Festival st July 2008 Exploring service user participation in the systematic review process Sarah Carr, Research Analyst, SCIE

The Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE)  The Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) was established by the UK government in 2001 to develop the social care evidence base  As part of this work SCIE commissions systematic reviews in social care  SCIE is politically committed to service user and carer participation in all its work, including systematic review methodology  The result of service user and/or carer participation in the systematic review process is perhaps a more robust evidence base for decision making or at least one which is more accountable to consumers

SCIE’s systematic review resources  SCIE has produced 2 online resources to develop and promote participative social care systematic review methodology:  Coren E & Fisher M (2006) The conduct of systematic research reviews for SCIE knowledge reviews  Carr S & Coren E eds. (2007) Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews

Learning from SCIE examples  These SCIE resources include examples of participation by different service user and/or carer groups at various stages of the review process  ‘While there are fundamental principles for participation in general that must be adhered to, current knowledge suggests that there is no single, failsafe solution’ (Carr, 2006)  However, key learning points and principles are emerging from SCIE’s work in the field

Learning from SCIE examples  ‘Participation needs to be appropriate to its context and to take account of the issues involved, the objectives sought and the…[service users and/or carers] who make up the target group’ (Treseder, 1996).  This could include a complete range of options for participation, from a systematic review that is undertaken by user researchers in a user-led project team, to a research team peopled by non- user researchers who are advised by and accountable to a majority user and/or carer steering group.

Learning from SCIE examples There are potential opportunities for participation at each of the standard stages of a systematic review at which key decisions are made:  selection of topic (interventions, populations)  setting the research question and conceptual framework and developing the protocol (including outcome measures)  defining relevant studies (inclusion/exclusion criteria)  searching exhaustively (search strategy)  describing the key features of studies (data extraction form)  assessing their quality (quality appraisal criteria)  synthesising findings across studies (e.g. themes to dominate analysis)  drawing conclusions  dissemination of findings and recommendations

Key learning points for user participation  Informed choice  Collaboration  Influence  Perspectives  Power  Accountability  Resources

Conclusion ‘…the benefits far outweigh the limitations and meaningful involvement (of service users and carers) in research is something worth striving for…’ (Clark, Glasby & Lester, 2004)

Further information  All SCIE knowledge reviews, guidelines and other publications available for free download at:  Sign up for alerts at:  For more about this topic please contact: