Basics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Lecture at Max Planck Institute August 14, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMB Constraints on Cosmology Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Advertisements

WMAP Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin January 24, 2007.
Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Texas Symposium in Melbourne December 15, 2006.
Anisotropies of Cosmic Microwave Background and Its Polarization A New & Ultimate Tool for Cosmology and Particle Physics Naoshi Sugiyama Nagoya University.
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Acoustic Waves in the Universe as a Powerful Cosmological Probe Eiichiro Komatsu Department of Astronomy, UT Acoustic Seminar, March 2, 2007 Eiichiro Komatsu.
Titel The Oldest Memory: The Echo of the Big Bang.
Modern Cosmology: The History of the History of the Universe Alex Drlica-Wagner SASS June 24, 2009.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Three-Year WMAP Observations Mitchell Symposium 2006 Eiichiro Komatsu The University of Texas at Austin April 11, 2006.
CMB as a physics laboratory
The Nobel prize in Physics 2006 piet mulders VU October 4, 2006
Probing Dark Matter with the CMB and Large-Scale Structure 1 Cora Dvorkin IAS (Princeton) Harvard (Hubble fellow) COSMO 2014 August 2014, Chicago.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 14; March
X What is the shape of our universe? By Sandro Berndt.
Quiz 4 Distribution of Grades: No Curve. The Big Bang Hubble expansion law depends on the amount of matter and energy (both are equivalent!) in the Universe;
The CMB and Neutrinos. We can all measure the CMB T CMB = \ K CMB approx 1% of TV noise! 400 photons/cc at 0.28 eV/cc.
ASTR Fall Semester Joel E. Tohline, Alumni Professor Office: 247 Nicholson Hall [Slides from Lecture23]
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Cosmology from CMB Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Lloyd KnoxUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 The Science Potential of Planck Lloyd Knox (UC Davis)
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
AS2001 / 2101 Chemical Evolution of the Universe Keith Horne Room 315A
MAPping the Universe ►Introduction: the birth of a new cosmology ►The cosmic microwave background ►Measuring the CMB ►Results from WMAP ►The future of.
AS2001 Chemical Evolution of the Universe Keith Horne 315a
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
How the Universe got its Spots Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics.
The measurement of q 0 If objects are observed at large distances of known brightness (standard candles), we can measure the amount of deceleration since.
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
The Statistical Properties of Large Scale Structure Alexander Szalay Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
The Beginning of Time: Evidence for the Big Bang & the Theory of Inflation.
Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Obs. March 27, 2007.
Prof Martin Hendry University of Glasgow. A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away…
The Cosmic Microwave Background
Remote Quadrupole Measurements from Reionization Gil Holder Collaborators: Jon Dudley; Alex van Engelen (McGill) Ilian Iliev (CITA/Zurich); Olivier Dore.
Reionization science from the CMB after Planck Michael Mortonson University of Chicago July 2, 2009.
ASTR 113 – 003 Spring 2006 Lecture 12 April 19, 2006 Review (Ch4-5): the Foundation Galaxy (Ch 25-27) Cosmology (Ch28-29) Introduction To Modern Astronomy.
Three-Year WMAP Observations: Method and Results Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Colloquium at U. of Florida October 13, 2006.
Cosmology That part of astronomy which deals with the nature of the universe as a whole.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
Cosmology : a short introduction Mathieu Langer Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale Université Paris-Sud XI Orsay, France Egyptian School on High Energy.
Naomi Pequette. Background Information History  Predicted -- George Gamow (1948) and Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman (1950)  Detected-- Arno Penizas.
Detecting the CMB Polarization Ziang Yan. How do we know about the universe by studying CMB?
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” INFN, Roma-1 FA-51 Meeting Frascati, June 22nd 2010.
Polarized Light in the Cosmic Microwave Background: WMAP Three-year Results Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Colloquium at U. of Minnesota November 3, 2006.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations
Results from Three-Year WMAP Observations
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
The Cosmic Microwave Background and the WMAP satellite results
Three-Year WMAP Observations: Method and Results
The Early Universe as seen by the Cosmic Microwave Background
Physics Seminar Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies and polarization with Planck Assoc. Prof. Guillaume Patanchon Astroparticle.
Annihilation (with symmetry breaking) quark soup
Big Bang.
Standard ΛCDM Model Parameters
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
Cosmology: The Origin and Evolution of the Universe
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Presentation transcript:

Basics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Lecture at Max Planck Institute August 14, 2007

Night Sky in Optical (~0.5nm)

Night Sky in Microwave (~1mm)

A. Penzias & R. Wilson, 1965

R. Dicke and J. Peebles, K NOW

P. Roll and D. Wilkinson, 1966 D.Wilkinson “The Father of CMB Experiment”

David Wilkinson (1935~2002) Science Team Meeting, July, 2002 Plotted the “second point” (3.2cm) on the CMB spectrum The first confirmation of a black-body spectrum (1966) Made COBE and MAP happen and be successful “The Father of CMB Experiment” MAP has become WMAP in 2003

COBE/DMR, 1992 Isotropic? CMB is anisotropic! (at the 1/100,000 level)

COBE to WMAP COBE WMAP COBE 1989 WMAP 2001 [COBE’s] measurements also marked the inception of cosmology as a precise science. It was not long before it was followed up, for instance by the WMAP satellite, which yielded even clearer images of the background radiation. Press Release from the Nobel Foundation

CMB: The Most Distant Light CMB was emitted when the Universe was only 380,000 years old. WMAP has measured the distance to this epoch. From (time)=(distance)/c we obtained  0.16 billion years.

WMAP 3-yr Power Spectrum

What Temperature Tells Us Distance to z~1100 Baryon- to-Photon Ratio Matter-Radiation Equality Epoch Dark Energy/ New Physics?

CMB to Cosmology &Third Baryon/Photon Density Ratio Low Multipoles (ISW) Constraints on Inflation Models

Determining Baryon Density

Determining Dark Matter Density

Measuring Geometry

Power Spectrum Scalar T Tensor T Scalar E Tensor E Tensor B

Jargon: E-mode and B-mode Polarization is a rank-2 tensor field. One can decompose it into a divergence- like “E-mode” and a vorticity-like “B-mode”. E-modeB-mode Seljak & Zaldarriaga (1997); Kamionkowski, Kosowsky, Stebbins (1997)

Primordial Gravity Waves Gravity waves create quadrupolar temperature anisotropy -> Polarization Directly generate polarization without kV. Most importantly, GW creates B mode.

Polarization From Reionization CMB was emitted at z~1088. Some fraction of CMB was re-scattered in a reionized universe. The reionization redshift of ~11 would correspond to 365 million years after the Big-Bang. z=1088,  ~ 1 z ~ 11,  ~ 0.1 First-star formation z=0 IONIZED REIONIZED NEUTRAL

Measuring Optical Depth Since polarization is generated by scattering, the amplitude is given by the number of scattering, or optical depth of Thomson scattering: which is related to the electron column number density as

Polarization from Reioniazation “ Reionization Bump ”

WMAP Results

Parameter Determination: First Year vs Three Years The simplest LCDM model fits the data very well. –A power-law primordial power spectrum –Three relativistic neutrino species –Flat universe with cosmological constant The maximum likelihood values very consistent –Matter density and sigma8 went down slightly

Constraints on GW Our ability to constrain the amplitude of gravity waves is still coming mostly from the temperature spectrum. –r<0.55 (95%) The B-mode spectrum adds very little. WMAP would have to integrate for at least 15 years to detect the B-mode spectrum from inflation.

What Should WMAP Say About Inflation Models? Hint for ns<1 Zero GW The 1-d marginalized constraint from WMAP alone is ns= GW>0 The 2-d joint constraint still allows for ns=1 (HZ).

What Should WMAP Say About Flatness? Flatness, or very low Hubble ’ s constant? If H=30km/s/Mpc, a closed universe with Omega=1.3 w/o cosmological constant still fits the WMAP data.

What Should WMAP Say About Dark Energy? Not much! The CMB data alone cannot constrain w very well. Combining the large-scale structure data or supernova data breaks degeneracy between w and matter density.

What Should WMAP Say About Neutrino Mass? WMAP alone (95%): - Total mass < 2eV WMAP+SDSS (95%) - Total mass < 0.9eV WMAP+all (95%) - Total mass < 0.7eV