BRIDG Update HL7 Working Group Meeting Phoenix, Arizona 20 January 2010 Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLINTON W. BROWNLEY AMERICAN UNIVERSITY PH.D. CANDIDATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 BRIDGing CDASH to SAS: How Harmonizing Clinical Trial and Healthcare Standards.
Advertisements

Cardiology Special Interest Group Presentation to Technical Steering Committee September 12, 2005.
HL7 ICSR DSTU Update FDA progress since last working group meeting: –Completed mapping to all FDA AE programs, data collection forms and E2B –Completed.
BRIDG Basics.
HL7 Version 3 Laboratory Result-based Adverse Event Assessment Message Specifications RCRIM Technical Meeting September 18, 2007 Jennifer Neat Project.
HL7 January Working Group Meeting
Joint TC Meeting: EHR – RCRIM RCRIM Overview HL7 Working Group Meeting January, 2007 Presented by: Ed Tripp Program Director, eSubmissions Abbott (RCRIM.
2006 European Interchange: RCRIM Meeting RCRIM Vocab & CDISC CT Initiative: Overview and Update Bron Kisler, CDISC Terminology Team Lead.
CDISC Content to Message HL7 Development Overview Jason Rock
Presentation to RCRIM San Antonio, TX January 15, 2008 Meredith Nahm, M.S. CV/TB Global Data Standards Efforts Therapeutic Area Data Standards: Cardiovascular.
1 HL7 Jan 2010 Working Group MeetingsCTLAB Pharmacogenomics Update JOINT RCRIM and CG Session CTLAB Message Pharmacogenomics Results Overview.
HL7 Working Group Meeting Orlando, Florida 14 January
CDISC-HL7 Project Update Armando Oliva, M.D. FDA Sponsor HL7 Workgroup Meeting January 14, 2008 San Antonio TX.
BRIDG Overview Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4: Updating a Cancer Research Standard Ann Setser 1, Ranjana Srivastava 2, Lawrence Wright 1,
Looking ahead: caGrid community requirements in the context of caGrid 2.0 Lawrence Brem 7 February 2011.
BRIDG Update Project Description/Scope As a catalyst for productive collaboration, CDISC brings together individuals spanning the healthcare continuum.
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Cardiovascular Data Analysis Model HL7 Balloting (September 22, 2011) Salvatore Mungal Duke Bioinformatics Shared.
Specimen-Related Classes in BRIDG BRIDG Overview for HL7 O&O WG Conference Call July 1, 2015 Wendy Ver Hoef NCI Contractor.
Bay Area CDISC Implmentation Network – July 13, 2009 How a New CDISC Domain is Made Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC SDTM Device Team.
Building, Maintaining, and Evolving a Model of Shared Semantics -- The BRIDG Project: Lessons Learned and Next Steps Charles Mead MD, MSc Chief Technology.
1CDISC 2002 RCRIM – Standard Domains Agenda NCI Presentation Standard Domains Working Group Goals Introduction to FDA Information Model (FIM) Discussion:
 BRIDG R3.0.2 was released in August 2010  The BRIDG Model passed the initial ISO Joint Initiative Council ballot as a Draft International Standard (DIS)
NCICB Jamboree February 25, 2005 NCICB Clinical Trials Modeling Activities.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
HL7 RCRIM Meeting: 9 January 2007 CDISC-RCRIM Vocab Update: Related CDISC Terminology Projects Bron Kisler, CDISC Terminology Program Director
1 RCRIM Vocab-BRIDG Session Wednesday, Session Q2 19 September 2007.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
RCRIM Off-cycle Meeting Barbara Tardiff, Randy Levin and Ed Tripp, co-chairs.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Briefing: HL7 Working Group Meeting Update for the VCDE Community Dianne M. Reeves Associate Director, Biomedical Data Standards NCI CBIIT VCDE Meeting.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) HL7 Tiger Team Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Care Coordination Services (CCS) May 1, 2013.
BRIDG Update HL7 Working Group Meeting Vancouver, BC, Canada 15 May 2012 Monday Q4, 3:30-5:00 Smita Hastak (on behalf of BRIDG SCC)
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
From PDF to RDF – Representing the CDISC Foundational Standards
BRIDG Update January HL7 Working Group Meeting 15 January
CDISC Update December 2007 / January 2008 Pierre-Yves Lastic, PhD CDISC Board of Directors & E3C February 5, Paris.
Interchange vs Interoperability Main Entry: in·ter·op·er·a·bil·i·ty : ability of a system... to use the parts or equipment of another system Source: Merriam-Webster.
NCI Enterprise Services (aka COPPA) CTRP and the Suite March 19, 2009.
BRIDG Update HL7 Working Group Meeting Lake Buena Vista, FL 17 May, 2011.
Commentary: The HL7 Reference Information Model as the Basis for Interoperability George W. Beeler, Jr. Ph.D. Co-Chair, HL7 Modeling & Methodology.
BRIDG Imaging Project Nov. 25th, Agenda Project Goals & Objectives Imaging Projects of interest Rationale for aligning with BRIDG Principles on.
FDA Standards Development and Implementation Randy Levin, M.D. Director, Office of Information Management Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
CDISC – 17/12/2012 Carine Javierre Nathalie SABIN.
1 CDISC HL7 Project FDA Perspective Armando Oliva, M.D. Office of Critical Path Programs FDA.
Doc.: IEEE /0281r1 Submission James D. Allen (Appairent Technologies, Inc.) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
BRIDG Update May HL7 Working Group Meeting 5 May
.  Strong leadership  Organization  Ability to break ideas into tasks/actions  Work as teams  Accountability  Flexibility  Support and appreciation.
BRIDG Update HL7 Working Group Meeting San Diego, California 13 September 2011 Tuesday Q2, 11-12:30.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting June 6, 2012 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
BRIDG Update RCRIM Working Group Meeting Rio de Janeiro 17 May 2010 Julie Evans Senior Director, Technical Services, CDISC Wendy Ver Hoef Senior Analyst,
Semantic Media Wiki Open Terminology Development - Initial Steps - Frank Hartel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Enterprise Vocabulary Services National Cancer.
BRIDG Overview and Ballot Results ISO TC 215 Rio de Janeiro 11 May 2010 Julie Evans Senior Director, Technical Services, CDISC Wendy Ver Hoef Senior Analyst,
CDISC SDS Oncology Domains: An Orientation to Aid Review & Feedback Barrie Nelson CDISC SDS Oncology Sub Team Lead
C3PR: An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Vijaya Chadaram Duke Cancer Center April 29, 2008.
RCRIM Working Group Meeting Wednesday Q1 17 September
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
BRIDG Adverse Event Sub-domain Summary
CDISC and related initativies
Clinical Interoperability Council Working Group (CIC)
Secondary Uses Primary Use EHR and other Auhortities Clinical Trial
Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008
Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD
Semantic Information Modeling for Federation
eLearning Initiative: Introduction to HL7
W3C HCLS Task Force on Drug Safety and Efficacy
Presentation transcript:

BRIDG Update HL7 Working Group Meeting Phoenix, Arizona 20 January 2010 Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group

2 Agenda BRIDG Overview Accomplishments Next Steps HL7 Harmonization Use of RIM-based Model

3 BRIDG Overview BRIDG Purpose: A collaborative effort to produce a shared view of the dynamic and static semantics that collectively define a shared domain-of-interest. Domain-of-interest/scope: Protocol-driven research and its associated regulatory artifacts, i.e. the data, organization, resources, rules, and processes involved in the formal assessment of the utility, impact, or other pharmacological, physiological, or psychological effects of a drug, procedure, process, or device on a human, animal, or other biologic subject or substance plus all associated regulatory artifacts required for or derived from this effort. Stakeholders: Process: Board of Directors prioritizes projects and committee consults with projects and harmonizes project models into main model with help of project analysts/SMEs

4 BRIDG Board of Directors 4 Appointed Members Charlie MeadNCI Dave Iberson-HurstCDISC Chuck JaffeHL7 Mitra RoccaFDA At Large MembersTerm Expiration Becky Kush2010 John Speakman*2010 Jack Jones2011 Cecil Lynch2012 AbdulMalik Shakir2012 * Chair

5 5 Semantic Coordination Committee NameAffiliation Charlie MeadNCI / Booz & Company Steve SandbergNCI / Mayo Clinic Smita HastakNCI / ScenPro, Inc. Wendy Ver HoefNCI / ScenPro, Inc. Becky AngelesNCI / ScenPro, Inc. Julie EvansCDISC Saurin MehtaCDISC / Novartis Jean DuteauNCI / Gordon Point Informatics Lloyd McKenzieNCI / Gordon Point Informatics

6 BRIDG Content ReleaseProjectStakeholder R1.0Regulated Product Submission (RPS)FDA/HL7 RCRIM Patient Study Calendar (PSC)NCI Clinical Trial Object Model (CTOM)NCI caXchange/LabHubNCI/HL7 RCRIM TC/CDISC R1.1Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM)CDISC Trial Design Model CDISC R2.0Adverse EventsCDISC, NCI, NIH, US Federal Gov’t, FDA Player / Scoper for Person and OrgNCI, CDISC Patient Registry (C3PR)NCI R2.1Clinical Trial Registry (COPPA, ct.gov, WHO, PRV1.0)CDISC, NCI Protocol Abstraction (COPPA – Correlations, Organizations, People and Protocol Abstraction) NCI R2.2CDISC HL7 Message Study Design (partial)FDA CDISC HL7 Message Study ParticipationFDA R3.0(Architecture Redesign only) R3.1Clinical Trials Registration and ResultsHL7 RCRIM

7 Reasons for Redesign Subject matter expert (SME) perspective: – Missing domain words, too abstract – Broad scope is overwhelming for most SMEs HL7 expert perspective: – Developers find it difficult to unambiguously map to RIM – Varying degrees of abstraction and explicitness in different areas of the model

8 Approach for Release 3.0 Separate the domain-friendly UML-based model from a new, fully specified RIM-based model Divide UML model into topical sub-domains: – Common, Protocol Representation, Study Conduct, Adverse Event, Regulatory Improve UML model: – Update or simplify parts of model for clarity – Add tags to UML model elements to indicate source model element mappings – Clean up diagrams – business rules become constraints, better association labels, etc.

9 3 Layer Architecture 9 Future

10 Layer 2: UML-Based BRIDG Model Products and Study Agents Regulatory Specimens Organizations and their Roles People and their Roles Study Subjects Documents Studies Study Design Study Activities, Observations and Results Specimen Collection Adverse Events

11 Layer 1: AE Sub-Domain UML Model

12 Layer 3: RIM-Based BRIDG Model PORT_DM100002US Study Protocol (1 of 24 models) DocumentEvent ClinicalTrialIntent

13 RCRIM use of BRIDG

14 Semantic Coordination Process At beginning of a project, the project team should contact SCC via website listserv for BRIDG SCC at The SCC will assign a point of contact for the project. The SCC point of contact will answer BRIDG questions, consult with team about progress, schedule BRIDG harmonization, bring project issues to the SCC, etc. Project team representatives will attend the harmonization meeting(s) with the SCC

15 Improvements Needed in SCC Process Need to involve SCC earlier in project process Need to accelerate coordination / harmonization process Other ideas welcome 15

16 Accomplishments Released BRIDG 3.0 October 2009 BoD Elections Harmonized CTR&R Balloted as CDISC Standard

17 Next Steps Ballot as a Standard – HL7 May Ballot Cycle Notification of Intent to Ballot: February 28, 2010 Initial Content Deadline: March 7, 2010 Ballot Preview Period: March 14, 2010 – March 27, 2010 Content and Reconciliation Deadline: March 21, 2010 Final Content Deadline: March 28, 2010 Example Deadline: April 14, 2010 Balloting Period: April 5, 2010 – May 9, 2010

18 Next Steps (cont.) Ballot as a Standard – ISO Content Deadline: 29 January 2010 Balloting Period: 1 February 2010 – 1 May 2010 – CDISC Content Deadline: mid-February 2010 Balloting Period: mid-February-March 2010

19 Next Steps (cont.) Continue Harmonization – Study Design – Subject Data – CTR&R – ICSR – SDTM V – CT Lab – NCI Projects (C3PR 2.0, PSC 2.0, etc)

20 Next Steps (cont.) Other Tasks – Ontology (OWL) – Vocabulary – Scalability

21 HL7 Harmonization Proposals RIM C30-01 Make ContextStructure.versionNumber ST RIM C30-02 Add Role and Participation.priorityNumber oRIM C30-06 Change definition for Person.raceCode and ethnicGroupCode

22 HL7 Harmonization Proposals (cont.) Vocab C30-03 Add additional temporal relationships Vocab C30-04 Add Contact roleLinkType Vocab C30-05 Add Baseline ActRelationship Vocab C30-07 Add Oversees roleLinkType Vocab C30-08 Add Prediction classCode Vocab C30-09 Add Uses ActRelationshipType

23 Intended Use of RIM-Based Model The RIM-based BRIDG model is NOT intended to replace all the RCRIM message models It is intended to help those familiar with HL7 representation to understand the semantics of the UML-based BRIDG model. It will act as a starting point for discussion on incorporating BRIDG requirements into existing HL7 models and vice versa where not already supported.

24 RCRIM DMIM Can the BRIDG RIM-based model be used as a DMIM? If so… – Existing structure will need to be reformatted – All existing RCRIM message models will need to be harmonized with BRIDG

25 BRIDG Project Home Page – SCC Contact Listserv – BRIDG Users Listserv – RCRIM: BRIDG as a DAM Listserv – Contact Information

26 Q & A