Right on Target… sCC4&safe=active sCC4&safe=active.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION Creating Tier I/PIPs Cleaning the Windshield.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
What do all these numbers mean? Columbia Elementary Data Night - Winter.
RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Using DIBELS to Guide Instruction Or What Is a Trajectory Anyway?
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
Using Data to Inform Instruction Second Year Teacher Induction March 25, 2010.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
OCTOBER 15, 2013 SHS DATA DAY. Critical Components of RtI 1.Leadership and Shared Responsibility 2.Problem-Solving/Data Based Decision Making 3.Assessment.
Welcome to Title I Reading Night! September 24, 2012.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Support School Intervention Plan St. Patrick School Ed 515 Mary Staley.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
P ROGRESS M ONITORING C ASE S TUDIES Aug 18, 2010.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
Tier 1-Core (100% meetings) Oregon RTI Spring Conference Todd Robson, Principal Carrie Ferguson, Literacy Specialist.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Spring Literacy Training Kindergarten Spring 2014.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Data-based Decisions: A year in review Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Objectives  Understand the rationale behind MTSS  Understand the TIPS process  Apply TIPS to analyze Tiers I, II, and III.
The State of the School Fall Goals What do we want children to know and be able to do with text in this school? We want our children to know how.
Assistance Team Procedures Iredell-Statesville Schools.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
READING 3D TRAINING Lynn Holmes Fall 2015.
ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
1 1.0 Review DIBELS Next ® Data Interpretation & Tier I Reading Systems.
Review of the Three - Tier Intervention Process
Assistant Principal’s Meeting Miami-Dade County Public Schools
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Overview
Data-Based Leadership
CASD K-6 Transition Plan from DIBELS to DIBELS Next
DIBELS Next Overview.
READ Act Reporting and Budget Planning
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Parent Information Night
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Right on Target… sCC4&safe=active sCC4&safe=active

2 Core Student Needs Resources Responsiveness to Instruction Identify Area(s) of Need Implement Plan Evaluate Develop a Plan Supplemental Intensive

3 Heart Patient

Documenting Problem-Solving: Core

Let’s Try One… 2 nd grade example Using the template

Early Warning System 7 Fall- 72% of 2 nd graders not on target… Core issue?

Triangulate the Data Common formative assessment (CFA) for reading comprehension- Target score = 75% 83% of students scored below 75%

Team Time Identify the problem. Remember: Behavioral/academic definition Concrete, observable and measurable Stranger test Typically begins broad

Group Activity Using the chart, place the pieces in the appropriate section We will share out answers when finished

Identify Problem(s) Seventy-two percent (72%) of all 2 nd grade students did not meet grade level expectation in the area of reading fluency and Eighty-three percent (83%) did not meet the expected benchmark score on a test of reading comprehension

Next….Develop Hypothesis We must ask questions to form a hypothesis regarding “What is the problem? Why is it occurring?” We ask questions across four domains InstructionCurriculumEnvironmentLearner

Develop Hypothesis Review Curricular materials Curriculum Maps Etc… Interview Previous Teachers Current Teachers Etc.. Observe Teacher’s instructional strategies During Instructional Time Etc.... Test Group Diagnostic Test Individual Testing data Skill specific test on sample of students Etc....

Develop Hypothesis Curriculum Instruction Environment Curriculum materials do not contain explicit fluency practice in K, 1, 2. Schedule for literacy does not contain explicit fluency practice in K, 1, 2. K-1 instruction was not systematic in phonics instruction and there was little instruction on irregular words.

Develop Hypothesis Curriculum Instruction Environment Review 1 st grade materials Review literacy block schedule Observe during literacy block Interview K-1 teachers Review K-1 materials, 1 st grade Reading 3D results

Collect & Use Data Interview K, 1 teachers; review materials for K, 1; review Reading 3d test results for 1 st ; Review 1 st grade curricular materials for the big five of literacy (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension) Review schedule and observe during literacy in first and second grade Schedule for first and second grade literacy reveals no explicit fluency practice in literacy for K, 1, 2 Very little explicit fluency practice in first grade curriculum; appropriate amount of time/materials/strategies for phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary and comprehension Materials and teachers report systematic phonics in kindergarten and first; Nonsense Word Fluency for 1 st - 90% of students on target

Precise Problem Statement 72% of students in second grade are not on target in the area of oral reading fluency and 83% of students in second grade are not on target for reading comprehension due to a lack of focus (explicit instruction and time in the literacy block) on reading fluency in first and second grades. Place in appropriate spot on the chart

Team Time Discuss possible solutions based on the precise problem statement 72% of students in second grade are not on target in the area of oral reading fluency and 83% of students in second grade are not on target for reading comprehension due to a lack of focus (explicit instruction and time in the literacy block) on reading fluency in first and second grades.

Discuss & Select Solutions Teacher utilizes direct instruction oral reading fluency strategies during literacy block (whole group & literacy stations) Utilize Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR) resources with teacher instruction/feedback Reading specialist goes in the classrooms for each literacy block to teach fluency skills ✔ ✔ ✖

Student Demographic Sheet Every student that is considered at risk (red or yellow on 3D or Aimsweb, Level 1 or 2 on EOG, below grade level on benchmarks, or from teacher observations) MUST have a demographic sheet completed This, in combination with the Tier 1 paperwork (stapled), takes the place of the SSP

Review Previous Evaluations Review previous evaluation(s) if conducted. This can be confirmed with the school psychologist or through records maintained in the school. If student moved between schools in our system it may be necessary to involve the school psychologist/program specialist. If assured that student was never evaluated for EC services, the referring teacher should sign here: Signature of referring teacher:___________________________________________________________ If evaluated previously: Obtain results from the previous assessment and include here (describe and/or attach DEC 3): Describe evidence that suggests the student would more likely meet or not meet eligibility for EC services if evaluated? Student NameGrade ID#D.O.B. Parent/Guardian Name(s) Address Phone # Services Received:Health Concerns: DateType of ContactPerson Making ContactOutcome Summary of Parent Contacts: Area of concern (circle): Phonological Awareness Fluency Comprehension Vocabulary Writing Math Behavior Student Demographic Information

What do students need to know? How will we know they’ve learned it? Universal Screening Data that supports the Area of Concern (Student is not meeting standard on Universal screen or grade level standard Universal Assessment/ScreeningDateScoreDateScoreDateScore See Literacy Diagnostic Flowchart for timeline LNF (K1)Fall Winter Spring FSF (K)Fall Winter Spring PSF (K-1)Fall Winter Spring NWF (K-2)Fall Winter Spring Reading 3D TRC (K-3 only) Fall Winter Spring Reading 3D DORF (1-3 only) Fall Winter Spring AIMSweb R-CBM (Fluency) (4-12) Fall Winter Spring AIMSweb Math-Early Numeracy- MCOMP(1-12) or MCAP (2-12) Fall Winter Spring Universal AssessmentsDateScoreDateScoreDateScore EOG/ EOC BA’s CA’s Previous year Reading EOG Previous year Math EOG Other dataDate# # # Absences Tardies/Early Release CoGat (3 rd, 5 th and 8 th grade) Retentions Discipline (Office referral, classroom offenses) Vision Speech /Hearing Screening needed? Tier 2-1 Tier Vision Hearing Speech

Don’t Get Stuck…. Pig&safe=activehttp:// Pig&safe=active

Feedback Please complete the exit ticket