Assessment Data Professional Collaboration Russ Romans and Mike Loughrey RDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Language of Coaching-based Supervision
Advertisements

EngageNY.org ©2012 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Facilitating Conversations in Collaborative Learning Structures Strategies That Promote Meaningful Discourse Janice Bradley Charles A. Dana Center.
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Design Collaborative Working on Modules Learning to Score with Rubrics Day 5 Lynda Gillespie Linda Mabe SREB.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Footloose Feedback.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
M-STEP 2015 Principal’s & PD Facilitator’s Meeting January 8 & 13, 2015.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
September 12, 2014 Lora M. McCalister-Cruel BDS District Data Coach Bay District Schools Data Analysis Framework.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
Examining Monitoring Data
Collaborative Strategic Reading: A Model for Content Area Reading
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Elizabeth Jean Bingham Central Elementary
Robert Kaplinsky Melissa Canham
LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 4: Professional Learning.
Trojan Triumph Time A Professional Dialogue. OBJECTIVES By the end of this meeting, we will have: 3-5 measurable goals for our students during TTT A plan.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIST TRAINING SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Session 1-4. Objectives for the session To highlight general themes and considerations when delivering the intervention. To consider each session in turn.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Monday 30 th August 2010  Why do we need e5? (read handout titled “A Profession without a Practice”) Highlight any points and be ready to share  The.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Unpacking Standards and Using Student-Friendly Language Facilitated by: Catherine Garrison Professional Development Specialist.
1 CCR Conference Summer 2014 Building Capacity of Content Teachers through A Comprehensive Literacy Initiative.
Providing Leadership for Improving Mathematics Achievement NJ Abbott Secondary Initiative, Grades 6-12 Academic Rigor Gayle Mills November 14, 2005 Southern.
A Successful Curriculum Mapping Initiative An Administrative Perspective Debra J. Sheard, Ed.D.
The Team Meeting Process Author: VCU T/TAC Clipart found at:
Section 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Shelly Rider AMSTI-USA Director.  To understand the effects of the Common Core State Standards on mathematical classroom instruction  To recognize the.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
The Mentor As Growth Agent: Developing Learning- Focused Relationships AWARENESS 1 Copyright 2006 MiraVia, LLC.
Chair & Minute Taking Training Isabel Costello, Student Voice Coordinator (Course Reps & Quality)
EngageNY.org Module Assessments and Data Cycles. EngageNY.org2 Good Morning! Please Mix It Up… Sit with principals, teachers, and coaches from different.
 Please sign in!  Then select a piece of colored cardstock.  Create a table tent by folding the cardstock in half.  Write your first name and school.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
Team Teaching Methods “Teachers learn best from other teachers, in settings where they literally teach each other the art of teaching.” (Little, 1987)
The Role of the Coach How can the coach support professional learning in our school? September 2009.
1 Participating in Learning Community to: Present and Give Feedback on QUALITY EVIDENCE required to complete Professional Certification Washington State.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
WICOR: COLLABORATION AVID PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
P1. P2 P3 OFF-RAMPS ON THE ACHIEVEMENT HIGHWAY Unaligned interim assessments No structured time in school day Infrequent interim assessments Externally.
April 5, 2011 Facilitation. Strategic questions WHAT? What do facilitators do in instructional rounds? WHY? Why have facilitators in instructional rounds?
LEADERSHIP & TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
Professional Learning Communities
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
Lynne Stallings Ball State University November 11, 2017
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Secondary District Professional Development
Teaching: Practice with Your Lessons Grades K-5
College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Teams November 2014
Secondary District Professional Development
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Data Professional Collaboration Russ Romans and Mike Loughrey RDA

Looking Ahead... The Magic of Data 3 minutes Quick AIMS Update and Refresher 1 min National Clearinghouse Research 2 min Data Leadership 5 min Assessment Data-Driven Dialogue 30 min Wrap-Up 1 min

AIMS Updates New Login Coming (APS login) EPSS Reports SBA – DBA – ACCESS One-Click to Teacher Assessment Data

The Language of Data-Driven Leadership “That’s nice, but tell me again: what’s the point of all this?

“That’s nice, but tell me again: what’s the point of all this? Small Groups/Pairs—Deliver Speeches (2 min): Deliver responses to each other Give feedback: What message did you hear (verbally and non-verbally)? What had the biggest impact? What would you change/improve?

Assessment Data Professional Collaboration Protocol

ASSESSMENT RESULTS MEETING PROTOCOL Relationship between Item Plot and Subgroup Reports WHAT SEEMS TO BE WORKING? (5 min) WHAT APPEAR TO BE THE CHIEF CHALLENGES (5 min) BRAINSTORM proposed solutions (5 min) REFLECTION: Feasibility of each idea (5 min) CONSENSUS around best actions (3 min) ACTIONS: When will the tasks happen? When will the teaching happen? (1 min )

IDENTIFY ROLES: Timer, facilitator, recorder (2 min) IDENTIFY OBJECTIVE to focus on (2 min) WHAT WORKED SO FAR (5 min) [Or: What teaching strategies did you try so far] CHIEF CHALLENGES (5 min) BRAINSTORM proposed solutions (10 min) [See protocol on next page] REFLECTION: Feasibility of each idea (5 min) CONSENSUS around best actions (15 min) [See protocol on next page] PUT IN CALENDAR: When will the tasks happen? When will the teaching happen? (10 min) Meeting Protocol 50 MIN TOTAL

PROTOCOLS PROTOCOL FOR BRAINSTORMING: Go in order around the circle: each person has 30 seconds to share a proposal. If you don’t have an idea, say “Pass.” No judgments should be made; if you like the idea, when it’s your turn simply say, “I would like to add to that idea by…” Even if 4-5 people pass in a row, keep going for the full brainstorming time. PROTOCOL FOR REFLECTION: 1 minute—Silent personal/individual reflection on the list: what is doable and what isn’t for each person. Go in order around the circle once: depending on size of group each person has seconds to share their reflections. If a person doesn’t have a thought to share, say “Pass” and come back to that person later. No judgments should be made.

PROTOCOLS PROTOCOL FOR CONSENSUS/ACTION PLAN: ID key actions from brainstorming that everyone will agree to implement Make actions as specific as possible within the limited time ID key student/teacher guides or tasks needed to be done to be ready to teach—ID who will do each task Spend remaining time developing concrete elements of lesson plan: Do Now’s Teacher guides (e.g., what questions to ask the students or how to structure the activity) Student guides HW, etc. NOTE: One person (if not two) should be recording everything electronically to send to the whole group

Planning Assessment Data Professional Collaboration 1.FIRST PD SESSION WITH ENTIRE FACULTY: Design the agenda for the whole-staff meeting introducing the data-driven instructional model you will launch 2.FIRST TEAM MEETING: Design the agenda for the first meeting with the grade-level and/or content area team that you will lead. Assume that the team has done very little in this area, and the teachers associate “data-driven” instruction with state testing and test prep

Wrap Up Thoughts?