Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Living on the Edge Lake and River-Friendly Management for Waterfront Residents Elizabeth Riggs, Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
Status Report on Catoctin Creek - A Scenic River Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch.
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Water Pollution Chapter 22 Lara, Nanor, Natalie, Sosi, Greg.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Developed by: Svendsen Updated: U1-m1a-s1 Why Do We Care About Water??
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Type Your Poster Title Here School name and Watershed name (e.g. Sand Hill River Watershed) Date Insert school logo up here Picture of team? Natural Resource.
An Introduction to NC’s Water Quality Program and *Nonpoint Source Pollution Division of Water Quality WQ Planning Branch NC Department of Environment.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Water Sources & Pollutants FS Unit 5 FCS-FS-5: Students will discuss why water and pH are important factors in food preparation and preservation. C. List.
Storm Water Permit Program Authority to regulate storm water discharges derives from 40 CFR Illinois EPA is delegated authority to administer this.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Water Pollution. Overview o Types of Water Pollution Sewage Sewage Disease-causing agents Disease-causing agents Sediment pollution Sediment pollution.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Integrated Watershed Management
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
Mulberry River Watershed
An Introduction to NC’s Water Quality Program and
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Pollution.
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation
Water Pollution.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute

Pollution: (Hu)man-made or (Hu)man-induced alteration of the chemical, physical (such as temperature or specific conductance), biological, and radiological integrity of water Clean Water Act (Section 502[19]) Kentucky identifies 538 separate pollutants

Water Quality quality – from the Latin word “qualis” meaning: of what kind descriptive characteristics/attributes/distinguishing features degree of excellence - Q: how good is it? A: typically dependent upon the intended use

Designated Uses Warm water aquatic habitat Cold water aquatic habitat Primary contact recreation (full immersion – swimming - May 1-October 31) Secondary contact recreation (incidental contact – boating, fishing - all year) Domestic water supply (taste and odor) Outstanding state resource waters Fish consumption advisories (implied)

Classifications Fully Supporting (good to excellent) Partially Supporting (fair, does not fully meet requirements for designated use) Nonsupporting (poor water quality for the designated use)

Sources of Pollution Activities and Practices Agriculture (20) Non-point Source (31) Habitat Impacts (16) Silviculture (12) Resource Extraction (21) Point Sources (11) Transportation (9) Recreation (6) Sediments (4) Marine/Boating (9) Water Withdrawal (3) Permitted Sources (11) Illegal Waste Disposal (7) Other (15) 175 TOTAL

Marine/Boating (9) 74 Marina boat construction 75 Marina boat maintenance 76 Marina dredging operations 77 Marina fueling operations 78 Marina-related shoreline erosion 79 Marina/boating pumpout releases 80 Marina/boating sanitary on-vessel discharges 94 Other Marina/Boating On-vessel Discharges 117 Shipbuilding, repairs, drydocking

Sources of Information Integrated Reports to Congress on the condition of Water Resources in Kentucky (305b and 303d)

Fixed (long-term) ambient surface water quality network

Reporting categories assigned to surface waters 1 All designated uses for water body fully supporting. 2 Assessed designated use(s) is/are fully supporting, but not all designated uses assessed. 2B Segment currently supporting use(s), but 303(d) listed & proposed to EPA for delisting. 3 Designated use(s) has/have not been assessed (insufficient or no data available). 4A Segment with an EPA approved or established TMDL for the listed uses not attaining full support. 4B Nonsupport segment with an approved alternative pollution control plan (e.g. BMP) stringent enough to meet full support level of all uses within a specified time. 4C Segment is not meeting full support of assessed use(s), but this is not attributable to a pollutant or combination of pollutants. 5 TMDL is required. 5B Segment does not support designated uses based on evaluated data, but based on Kentucky listing methodology insufficient data are available to make a listing determination. No TMDL needed.

Leading causes affecting aquatic life use water quality statewide, in miles.

Percentage of Assessed Stream Miles Supporting Primary Contact Recreation 2012

Pollutants affecting Kentucky rivers and streams (assessed miles) 1.Fecal coliform + E. coli (pathogens)..…3,548 2.Sedimentation/Siltation…………….……..3,167 3.Nutrient/eutrophication……….…………..1,673 4.Cause unknown……………….…………….……869 5.Total dissolved solids… ………………….……774 6.Organic enrichment (sewage)………….… Specific conductance…………………..………762 8.Iron……………………………………………..………267 9.pH…………………………………………….………… Total suspended solids…..……….………….221

Kentucky Division of Water Water Health Portal An interactive Web-based map application that enables users to learn about the health of the streams in their area and across the Commonwealth. NOTE: The Water Health Portal performs best when using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari

Water Maps Portal

Kentucky River Watershed Watch Database (Note: Downloads do not currently work with Internet Explorer) Annual Reports ling%20Results/Annual%20Reports.html ling%20Results/Annual%20Reports.html

2014 Sampling Sites

Watershed Watch Database

In search box, type in – water BMPs – LID (acronym for low impact development) – erosion BMPs – pathogen BMPs – nutrient BMPs – stormwater BMPs Can also do general searches using these same terms with Internet search engines (Google, Bing, etc.)

Mitigating Water Quality Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, QUESTIONS?

South Elkhorn Creek

Assessment Icons

Blue Lines = Not Assessed

Search by County

List of Sites

Icons for Field Data

Annual Reports Online