1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade – main drivers Overview of the sub-detector.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
Scintillating fibre tracker First SHiP Workshop Zurich, 12 June, 2014 Vladimir SHEVCHENKO, on behalf of Kurchatov Institute SciFi group, Moscow, Russia.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Scintillating Tiles for the Muon Inner regions LHCb Muon Upgrade meeting, CERN May Wander Baldini for the Ferrara LHCb group.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
V. Korbel, DESY1 Progress Report on the TESLA Tile HCAL Option To be filled soon.
The LHCb Electromagnetic Calorimeter Ivan Belyaev, ITEP/Moscow.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Engineering Design Review: Fibres, Mats and Modules Heidelberg 16 & 17 July Introduction 2.Fibres 3.Fibre Mats 4.Modules 5.Interfaces 6.Test beam.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Muon Upgrade Meeting ( ) – P. Campana Since our last discussion : - CB decision to prepare a LOI for an Upgrade of LHCb (approx 100 pages, 10 for.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
Run II preparations Test beam plans Moving from 156 to 169 DT-LHCb coordination meeting June 2, 2015.
Burkhard Schmidt, CERN on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade 1.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Technological advances for the LHCb upgrade Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Upgrade activities DT-LHCb coordination meeting 14 March 2016.
Future Beam Test Plans of the Calorimeter Group Aug 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.
Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )
Burkhard Schmidt, CERN.  Lecture I  Physics Motivation for the HL-LHC  Lecture II  An overview of the High-Luminosity upgrade of the LHC  Lecture.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
DT-LHCb coordination meeting 18 April 2016
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
Overview and update of LHCb Upgrade
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL
The LHC collider in Geneva
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Presentation transcript:

1

Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution Magnet Good tracking and mass resolution RICH2 Trigger Tracker Inner and Outer Trackers Inner and Outer Trackers Beam 1 Beam 2 2

… cm 2 s cm 2 s cm 2 s -1 LS1 LS2 3fb – 7 TeV 5-7 fb fb – 14 TeV 50 ns 25 ns 1 MHz 40 MHz L ∫L Beam Energy Bunch Spacing L0 rate After LS2,  High occupancy in the central region requires new detectors technology and granularity  Silicon detectors with embedded r-o electronics must be replaced After LS2,  High occupancy in the central region requires new detectors technology and granularity  Silicon detectors with embedded r-o electronics must be replaced

4 2 x ~3 m 2 x ~ 2.5 m readout Silicon strips Straw Tubes Scintillating Fibers + SiPM (An hybrid version combining Scintillating fibers and Straw Tube is also considered) 3 stations of X-U-V-X scintillating fibre planes (≤5°).=> 12 planes Every plane is made of 5 layers of Ø250  m fibres, 2.5 m long. Symmetry around y=0 Read out by SiPM outside acceptance Minimize the dose to read-out electronics and dead materials in the acceptance.

5 Npe SiPM array 1 SiPM channel Resolution (c.o.g.) um Double cladded scint. fibres, e.g. Kuraray SCSF-78, Ø 250 um

6 Scintillating Fibers and SiPM already been used in HEP but:  not for read out of 2.5m SciFi  not in high radiation environment. Main Challenges  Radiation hardness of SiPM (increase of dark current with radiation)  Radiation hardness of Fibers (decrease of light yield and attenuation length)  LHC environment (25 ns), high occupancy and background  Detector geometry and integration in existing experiment.

7  Max dose to fibers 35 kGy (err 8%)  Dose distribution strongly peaked around the beam pipe  Dose to the SiPM: ( MeV n eq)  Max dose to fibers 35 kGy (err 8%)  Dose distribution strongly peaked around the beam pipe  Dose to the SiPM: ( MeV n eq) FLUKA simulation for 50 fb-1 integrated luminosity Gy/collision

8 Irradiation performed at CERN and Karlruhe, up to ~60k Gy  Attenuation length decreases with absorbed dose  Logarithmic dependence (effect observed already at low dose)  Attenuation length decreases with absorbed dose  Logarithmic dependence (effect observed already at low dose)

9C. Joram / CERN9 Reflectivity Aluminized mylar foil 3M ESR foilAluminium thin film coating Two samples of each type Cheapest and technically simplest solution gives the best result. Mirror

10 Non-irradiated fibers Irradiated fibers (50 fb-1 eq.) With Mirror Without Mirror Relative photon yield vs distance from SiPM

11 In UX85 – LHCb cavern: Cooled vs non cooled SiPM Radiation hardness studies and simulation have shown that SiPM shall be cooled down to ~-40C to operate smoothly over the entire LHCb upgrade ( MeV n eq.) Radiation hardness studies and simulation have shown that SiPM shall be cooled down to ~-40C to operate smoothly over the entire LHCb upgrade ( MeV n eq.) Dark Current Time Observation:  Dark current increase with absorbed dose  Possible annealing effect  SiPM dark current is reduced by a factor ~2/8C

SiPM arraysScintillating FibersCooling pipe Cooling SiPM to -40 C Many configuration envisaged to optimize heat transfers

 Heat load dominated by incoming heat transfer (SiPM power < 2w/module)  Insulation thickness defined by dew point in LHCb cavern (<10- 12C)  Heat load estimated to 5-10 Watt per module of 53 cm  Heat load dominated by incoming heat transfer (SiPM power < 2w/module)  Insulation thickness defined by dew point in LHCb cavern (<10- 12C)  Heat load estimated to 5-10 Watt per module of 53 cm

Thermal mock-up for 16 SiPM arrays C3F8 2 phase cooling tests (in collab. with CTU Prague) Also considering 2-phase C2F6, blends Single phase (Air, C6F14..) CO2 Thermo electric Also considering 2-phase C2F6, blends Single phase (Air, C6F14..) CO2 Thermo electric

15 Semi-Manual technique

16 LHCb Fiber ribbon assembly device being constructed at TU Dortmund – technique developped for PEBS at RWTH Aachen LHCb Fiber ribbon assembly device being constructed at TU Dortmund – technique developped for PEBS at RWTH Aachen Automated Technique

17 Automated Technique Winding wheel Fiber supply Groove to drive the fiber OK Positioning precision <20  m RMS OK Positioning precision <20  m RMS Not OK Faulty 4 th layer Not OK Faulty 4 th layer

18 SciFi modules 1-3 VELO telescope SciFi Irradiated module 2 SiPM temperature control SciFi long module GOALS Test of irradiated vs non-irradiated module (SiPM and Fibers) Effect of temperature on SiPM noise. Comparison KETEK vs Hamamatsu Effect of mirror Nov. 2012

19 Nov  Comparison of Hamamatsu and KETEK photon yield  With mirror / without mirror at the far end  Comparison of Hamamatsu and KETEK photon yield  With mirror / without mirror at the far end  Mirror do improve the light yield from the far end  Significant differences are observed between different manufacturer. Improvements expected from both manufacturers  Mirror do improve the light yield from the far end  Significant differences are observed between different manufacturer. Improvements expected from both manufacturers

20  There is no adequate SiPM readout chip available on the market  Need to develop a new analog readout optimized for 40MHz  There is no adequate SiPM readout chip available on the market  Need to develop a new analog readout optimized for 40MHz  Design choices depend on SiPM response, occupancy distributions, light propagation times  Options with part of the ASIC functionality transferred to FPGAs (more flexibility, cost?, radiation?) are also being studied  Design choices depend on SiPM response, occupancy distributions, light propagation times  Options with part of the ASIC functionality transferred to FPGAs (more flexibility, cost?, radiation?) are also being studied

LS1 LS2 R&D Demo- Modules Demo- Modules Detector components series production Detector components series production Assembly of Stations Assembly of Stations Tooling Pre-module production Tooling Pre-module production Assembly of modules Dismantling of IT and OT detectors Install Stations Install Services Power, cooling, shielding Install Services Power, cooling, shielding Metrology and alignment Commissioning 18 month