IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
IDS120j WITH/WITHOUT GAPS SH#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/14/2012) 1.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 11 Mar 2009 Neutrino Factory Cryostat 1 Concept V.B. Graves MERIT Videoconference.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.
IDS120h: Be WINDOW DETAILED CALCULATION, SHIELDING VESSELS, RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT GLOBAL STEPS Nicholas Souchlas (9/20/2011) 1.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
Update of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance X.R. Wang S. Malang A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES Meeting Madison, Wisconsin September.
STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR IDS80 (NO IRON PLUG/YOKE), ADDING SHIELDING IN 75 TO 80 cm (WC/H 2 O, B, Cd). NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL) Dec. 14, 2010‏ ‏ 1.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Target and Horn status report
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Additional Upstream Coil Shielding
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
Presentation transcript:

IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1

IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # MODIFYING Hg MODULE TO SIMULATE VAN GRAVE'S DESIGN. DETAILS OF VARIOUS DIMENSIONS TO BE DETERMINED AND/OR CLARIFIED. WE MUST MINIMIZE THE LOSS OF SHIELDING MATERIAL ESPECIALLY AROUND THE TARGET REGION ( FIRST ~ 2 m OF CRYO#1 ) *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm >EVENTS IN SIMULATIONS : N p = 500,000 ( OR 4x500,000 FOR SC#1+2) 2 IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # SIMULATIONS USING LOWEST GRADE W BEADS IN SHIELDING ( OF 15.8 g/cc ) # BP#2 SEGMENTATION STUDIES WITHIN THE FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL. *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm

IDS120j: GENERAL OVERVIEW (LEFT), POOL REGION DETAILS (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] SH#1 SH#1A SH#2 SH#1A Hg POOL SH#4 SH#3 Hg POOL SH#1 2 cm THICK STST OUTER TUBE CRYO#1 CRYO#4 CRYO#3 CRYO#2 2 cm THICK STST BEAM PIPE BEAM PIPE EXTENDS HALF WAY UPSTREAM TO THE POOL SH#1 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT FLANGE Hg POOL STARTS ~ 85 cm AND EXTENDS ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THE FIRST CRYOSTAT ~ 370 cm. 3 THE NEW Hg POOL MODULE WILL DISPLACE A LARGE VOLUME OF SHIELDING MATERIAL IN SH#1 AND THE FIRST HALF OF SH#1A ( TOP VOLUME REGION ), WHERE IT IS MOSTLY NEEDED FOR THE PROTECTION OF SC#1 - SC#4. REGION TO BE MODIFIED

IDS120j: WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS. DETAILS OF THE DOUBLE STST Hg POOL VESSEL (LEFT, MIDDLE) AND THE DOUBLE Be WINDOW (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] 2 cm THICK STST INNER Hg POOL VESSEL WITH 1 cm He GAP FOR COOLING. TWO 0.5 cm THICK Be WINDOWS AT THE END OF CRYO#1 WITH 0.5 cm He GAP BETWEEN THEM FOR COOLING. 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT / LEFT FLANGE OF SHVS#4, SHVS#1 / SHVS#2 WITH 20 cm GAP BETWEEN THEM. 4

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION. 5 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx AT z=0.0 cm ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF Hg POOL MODULE BORDERS COMPARED WITH THE OLDER DESIGN. y z NEW SH#1 INNER VESSEL TO HATCH THE Hg POOL STST DOUBLE WALL MODULE. SEMICIRCULAR UPPER HALF OF Hg POOL MODULE INNER VESSEL WILL MATCH THE APPERTURE OF THE BEAM PIPE AT THE END OF CRYO#1 ( R ~ 17 cm ). THAT WILL MINIMIZE THE LOSS OF SHIELDING UPSTREAM. ORIGINAL BP#1 l = 100 cm LONG STRAIGHT SECTION OF BEAM PIPE IN TARGET REGION WITH R = 10 cm WILL BE REPLACED WITH BELL LIKE BEAM PIPE.

6 IDS120j: yz CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF Hg POOL MODULE FROM VAN GRAVE'S PRESENTATION ( 8 / 9 / 2012 ). THE DESIGN REQUIRES A 2.5 cm ! GAP BETWEEN SH#1 INNER VESSEL AND Hg POOL MODULE OUTER VESSEL. AN EVEN LARGER SPACE APPEARS TO BE BETWEEN INNER AND OUTER VESSEL OF THE Hg POOL MODULE FOR THE FLOW OF He GAS FOR COOLING THE POOL. THE RADIUS OF THE UPPER HALF SEMICIRCULAR SECTION OF INNER Hg POOL VESSEL WILL BE 26.5 cm, MUCH LARGER THAN THE BEAM PIPE APERTURE AT THE END OF CRYO#1 ( ~ 17.7 cm ). VACUUM He FOR COOLING

φ = 0 O φ = 90 O y IDS120j: yx CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF Hg POOL MODULE FROM VAN PLOTS ( LEFT ) AND ADDAPTED DESIGN FOR MARS SIMULATIONS ( AT z = 100 cm ). EVERYTHING HAS BEEN PARAMETRIZED FOR FUTURE CONVINIENCE. THE HEIGHTS OF THE END POINTS OF THE STRAIGHT SECTIONS ARE HL = - 17 cm AND HU = 12 cm. THE FREE Hg POOL SURFACE IS AT y = - 15 cm. THE RADIUS OF THE LOWER HALF OF THE INNER VESSEL OF THE Hg MODULE IS NOW SMALLER THAN BEFORE : FROM ~ 45 cm ----> ~ 42 cm. THE REST OF THE SPACE BETWEEN SHVS#1 INNER AND OUTER TUBE IS FILLED WITH SHIELDING. HL = - 17 cm HU = 12 cm HGPL = - 15 cm 7 SH#1 SH#4 Hg SHVS#4 2.0 cm STST INNER TUBE SHVS#1 2.0 cm STST OUTER TUBE 0.5 cm GAP BETWEEN INNER SHVS#4 AND SHVS#1 OUTER TUBE 1.0 cm He GAPS BETWEEN VESSELS AND SHIELDING

IDS120j: yx CROSS SECTION AT z = cm WITH DETAILES OF THE HG MODULE UPPER SIDE. φ = 0 O φ = 90 O 2 cm STST SH#1 INNER TUBE. 1.0 cm STST Hg MODULE OUTER TUBE. 0.4 cm He GAP BETWEEN OUTER TUBE AND INNER TUBE IN Hg MODULE. 1.0 cm STST Hg MODULE INNER TUBE. VACUUM SH#1 SHIELDING ALL TUBES THICKNESSES AND GAPS SIZE ARE PARAMETRIZED. SHVS#1 INNER TUBE THIKNESS IS SET TO 2.0 cm TO SUPORT THE SHIELDING WEIGHT, THE LOWER Hg MODULE INNER TUBE CAN ALSO BE THICKER TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF Hg IN THE POOL. [ ARE THESE NUMBERS I SET UP RESONABLE ? ] cm VACUUM GAP BETWEEN SHVS#1 INNER AND Hg MODULE OUTER TUBE

IDS120j: yz CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE NEW Hg MODULE AND THE LOWER HALF OF THE UPSTREAM REGION. [20 cm GAPS] z y WHAT CONFIGURATION OF THE SHIELDING MATERIAL BEFORE THE POOL IS ACCEPTABLE FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ? A) IS IT POSSIBLE TO KEEP THE SAME AS BEFORE ? [ FROM -100 < z < 0 cm, 10 < r < 50 cm FILLED WITH SHIELDING AND THEN A SMALL VOLUME WITH VARYING r TO CONNECT WITH THE NEW Hg MODULE ] *** BEST CHOICE *** B) THE UPPER HALF WILL FOLLOW THE Hg MODULE SHAPE AND THE LOWER PART WILL BE FILLED WITH SHIELDING UP TO y = -10 cm, CLOSE TO THE POOL WILL GRADUALY DECREASE TO MEET THE POOL LEVEL AND ALLOW THE JET ENTER THE POOL. *** SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF SHIELDING IN TARGET REGION *** 9