AWB 1011061 Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
Advertisements

1 A1 / A2 Fit-up Test 3/30/07 T. Brown / A. Brooks A1-A2 fit-up shims.ppt.
WING SUPPORT CONCEPTS FOR WINGS # 2,3,6,7 AND 9 GARY MCGINNIS 09/19/ – TAPPING HOLES FOR STUDS 2 – STUD AND INSERT WELDING 3 – WELDING BRACKETS.
Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Overview Paul Goranson WBS 12 Manager Vacuum Vessel Manufacturing Study Kickoff meeting April 29, 2003.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Preassembly of second bottom yokes and poleshoes. a) Install special support. b) Place the second bottom.
Recent Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, June 14, 2006 UCSD, San Diego,
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Research Forum #1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
Metrology for NCSX Steve Raftopoulos and the NCSX Metrology Team.
TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
NCSX 1 NCSX Engineering Overview Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Manager On behalf of the NCSX Team.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
1 NCSX Modular coil winding pack To shim or not to shim? NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting July 7, 2004 What is requirement? What is baseline winding pack.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
Measurement of Modular Coil Keystone Effect Peer Review 4/1/03.
Defining the Vacuum Vessel Geometry NCSX Project Meeting November 27, 2002 Art Brooks.
Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.
Lecture 5 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011 [1] Halbach, K., FIRST ORDER PERTURBATION EFFECTS IN IRON-DOMINATED TWO- DIMENSIONAL.
NCSX A. Brooks, P. Fogarty, G. Lovett, D. Williamson June 3, 2005 Modular Coil Type-C Final Design Review – Part II.
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62)
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NCSX David Johnson August 18, 2004 Discussion of Co-Wound Flux Loops.
NCSX B. Stratton May 13, 2005 Modular Coil Winding Dimensional Control Plan Peer Review.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and Schedule, Staffing, and Metrology Utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
NCSX B. Nelson for the NCSX Engineering Team NCSX modular coil cooling workshop June 10-11, 2004 PPPL NCSX Modular Coil Cooling Requirements and Initial.
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and schedule, staffing, and metrology utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
NCSX NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review 11/6/07 1 Tom Brown Art Brooks Raki Ramakrishnan Mike Kalish NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
Modular Coil Metrology Data for Current Center Shift Calculation.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
1 Modular Coil Winding Keystoning Issues NCSX Technical Meeting May 29, 2003 What is the current baseline winding? What is the problem? What are the variables.
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
MCZ Magnetic Allignment of Coils for NCSX M.C. Zarnstorff 11 December 2006.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
DRAFT Cost and schedule, staffing, metrology utilization 10 AM October 12, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Cost and Schedule Rebaseline April 25, 2005 NCSX Project Re-baseline Review April 25, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
12/19/2006Mike Viola1 December Lehman Review December 19, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Field Period Assembly + + =
NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL.
Stellarator Core Machine Configuration NCSX Project Meeting Dec 19-20, 2000 B. Nelson, M. Cole, P. Fogarty P. Goranson, G. Jones, D. Williamson O AK R.
1 CD-2 ECP Preparations What is Needed. 2 Background As part of the CD-2 process, we need to establish a fully supported and documented cost and schedule.
Practical aspects of small aperture quadrupoles Dr Ben Leigh Tesla Engineering Ltd.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
1 NCSX radial build NCSX Project Meeting December 18, Modular coil build assumptions 2.Vessel build assumptions 3.FW/internal build assumptions.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
PEER Review of Coil Tolerances and Trim Coil Requirements plus Magnetic Material in Test Cell April 19, 2004 Art Brooks.
1 NCSX Construction Overview NCSX Team (presented by L. Dudek) March, 2008.
Full-scale trial results to qualify optimized manufacturing plan for ITER Toroidal Field coil winding pack in Japan Dummy double-pancake (DP) winding was.
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
Impact of a Mock-up Ferromagnetic TBM on Plasma Operations in C-Mod
Alignment of the first two magnet system modules of Wendelstein 7-X
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks

AWB Overview Physics Requirements on Installed Coil Current Centers Coil Tolerances Tolerance Breakdown between Stations Modular Coil Winding Form Measurement Data and As- Wound Coil Current Centers Achieved Improvements thru Coil Realignment

AWB Physics Requirements from GRD relates to Field Errors: –Field error correction (trim) coils shall be provided to compensate for fabrication errors. –The toroidal flux in island regions due to fabrication errors, magnetic materials, and eddy currents shall not exceed 10% of the total toroidal flux in the plasma (including compensation) Tolerance set based partially on experience of other machines –1 part in 1000 or 1.5 mm for a 1.5 m device Extensive tolerance studies done to verify that field errors from coils in conjunction with trim coils can achieve desired field quality –see “Field Errors and Coil Tolerances, NCSX FDR, May 19-20, 2004” Tolerances on coils with less impact on field errors (further from the plasma) were softened Requirements

AWB Coil Tolerances Specifications The Coil Tolerance herein pertains to the location of the current center of the installed coils relative to the ideal/theoretical position: –Modular Coils +/- 1.5 mm (0.060 in) –PF Coils+/- 3.0 mm (0.120 in) –TF Coils+/- 3.0 mm (0.120 in) –Trim Coils+/- 3.0 mm (0.120 in) Tolerances are further allocated to limit tolerance buildup between various fabrication and assembly operations.

AWB Modular Coils Tolerance Allocation Vendor Machining of MCWF (+/ )” In House Coil Winding Process +/ ” –(Includes prior machining) –Realignment offers chance for improvements Half Period (3 Pack) Assembly +/ ” –Flange to Flange Alignment (B-A, C-B) Full Period Assembly over VV +/ ” –Flange to Flange Alignment (A-A) 3 Period Assembly in Test Cell +/ ” –Flange to Flange Alignment (Cs-Cs)

AWB Correcting MCWF Out of Tolerances During Modular Coil Winding Machining of MCWF Base and Septum winding surfaces were out of tolerance ~0.050” in some locations Adjustments to Coil Winding Pack led to meeting current center requirements over most of the coils AB Base Septum

AWB Modular Coil Type C Clamp Number Convention and Side A/B Designation

AWB Summary of As-Built Dimensions on MCWF Type C Coils – Side A Septum

AWB Summary of As-Built Dimensions on MCWF Type C Coils – Side B Septum

AWB Summary of As-Built Dimensions on MCWF Type C Coils– Side A Base

AWB Summary of As-Built Dimensions on MCWF Type C Coils– Side B Base

AWB C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

AWB Maintaining Coil Current Centers After Winding Winding process allows for controlling current center by adjusting Coil Winding Clamps Emphasis was placed on making all coils alike by winding coils to match current center achieved on prior coils: –C1 targeted design, C2 targeted C1, C3 targeted average of C1 and C2,... Nominal coil geometry will be redefined based on average current center achieved for each coil type.

AWB Modular Coils Type C Current Centers After Winding Relative to Targets Note - This is only a measure of how well coils were wound

AWB Modular Coils Type C Current Centers After Winding Relative to Targets Note - This is only a measure of how well coils were wound

AWB Final Modular Coils Type C Current Centers After Winding Relative to Design Targeting of prior coils has lead to uniform coils

AWB Final Modular Coils Type C Current Centers After Winding Relative to Design Targeting of prior coils has lead to uniform coils

AWB Average of C Coils to date

AWB Average of C Coils to date

AWB Further Corrections with Coil Realignment Knowing the as-built coil geometry permits analytic determination of would-be field errors. By making small adjustments to the reference positions of each coil, the dominant resonant field errors can be suppressed. Coil realignments can be calculated independently for each coil using the 6 dof, or collectively within a coil type allowing for targeting of more modes with potentially lower displacements.

AWB Independent Realignment

AWB Collective Realignment

AWB Summary Tolerances are tight but necessary, in conjunction with trim coils, to maintain field quality Coil Winding Process has been able to correct some of the OOT from the machining of the MCWF Coil Realignment should allow for further corrections as needed to reduce resonant field errors