INFSO-RI-508833 Enabling Grids for E-sciencE www.eu-egee.org Institution of SLAs TNLC Meeting ― Athens, 2005-04-21 Afrodite Sevasti (SA2, GRNET)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
Advertisements

Identifying MPLS Applications
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
ETSI Workshop on Quality Issues for IP Telephony 8-9 June 1999, Sophia Antipolis, France ETSI PROJECT TIPHON overview of QoS activities ETSI Workshop on.
CCNA – Network Fundamentals
Hierarchy of Routing Knowledge IP Routing: All routers within domains that carry transit traffic have to maintain both interior and exterior routing information.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate NTUA/GRNET Interdomain SLAs Enforcement Framework in Real QoS-Enabled Networks C. Marinos, A. Polyrakis, V. Pouli, M.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Network in EGEE Building end-to-end network.
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
ACN: IntServ and DiffServ1 Integrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv) Information taken from Kurose and Ross textbook “ Computer.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 8. CS Summer 2003 Populating LFIB with LDP Assigned/Learned Labels Changes in the LFIB may be triggered routing or.
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
Efficient agent-based selection of DiffServ SLAs over MPLS networks Thanasis G. Papaioannou a,b, Stelios Sartzetakis a, and George D. Stamoulis a,b presented.
An Architecture for Differentiated Services
Data Communications and Networks Chapter 2 - Network Technologies - Circuit and Packet Switching Data Communications and Network.
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
Computer Networking Quality-of-Service (QoS) Dr Sandra I. Woolley.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
CCNA – Cisco Certified Network Associates Routing and Static Routes By Roshan Chaudhary Lecturer Islington College.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE II - Network Service Level Agreement (SLA) Establishment EGEE’07 Mary Grammatikou.
TERENA Networking Conference 2004, Rhodes, Greece, June Differentiated Optical Services and Optical SLAs Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 2 Module 8 TCP/IP Suite Error and Control Messages.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE SA2 and JRA4: Network Services K. Kavoussanakis, EPCC, The University of Edinburgh J-P. Gautier,
10/8/2015CST Computer Networks1 IP Routing CST 415.
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Differentiated Services for the Internet Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
Beyond Best-Effort Service Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot November 2010 November.
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
Multimedia Wireless Networks: Technologies, Standards, and QoS Chapter 3. QoS Mechanisms TTM8100 Slides edited by Steinar Andresen.
Differentiated Services for the Internet Selma Yilmaz.
Applicazione del paradigma Diffserv per il controllo della QoS in reti IP: aspetti teorici e sperimentali Stefano Salsano Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE GRID sites connectivity database design Anthony Teslyuk, RRC KI JRA4, SA2 Meeting 4 th EGEE.
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
Enabling Grids for E-sciencE GRIDCC testing EGEE II’ SLA framework through GEANT infrastructure Mary Grammatikou –
Two-Tier Resource Management Designed after the Internet’s two-tier routing hierarchy Separate packet forwarding from admission and resource allocation.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Service Provision Architecture TNLC Meeting ― Athens, Mathieu Goutelle (SA2, CNRS.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Etienne Dublé - CNRS/UREC EGEE SA2 Xavier.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Network Resources Provision Jean-Paul Gautier SA2 manager Cork meeting,
1 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc _05F9-c1 Aggregated RSVP Bruce, Carol, Francois, and Fred Taggers on the Information Superhighway.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Vassiliki Pouli
Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE-II Meeting EGEE-II SA2 activity Tziouvaras Chrysostomos, MSc NTUA, 14 th March 2006.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Update on Network Performance Monitoring.
SLA/SLS Fundamental concepts SLAs/SLSs are the essential mechanisms for agreeing, configuring, delivering, guaranteeing and evaluating the obtained QoS.
TeraPaths: A QoS Enabled Collaborative Data Sharing Infrastructure for Petascale Computing Research The TeraPaths Project Team Usatlas Tier 2 workshop.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE End-to-End Service Level Agreement Provisioning and Monitoring for End-to-End QoS.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE NRENs & Grids Workshop Relations between EGEE & NRENs Mathieu Goutelle (CNRS UREC) EGEE-SA2.
The Difference Between Router and Switch Not everyone knows: ADVANTAGES OF SWITCH:  Switches offer higher performance than bridges and hubs.  Switches.
SA2 : Network Resource Provision All Activity Meeting – 17 March SA2 Execution Plan for the first year Jean-Paul Gautier SA2 Manager CNRS/UREC.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Operations Automation Team Kickoff Meeting.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks LHCOPN Operational model: Roles and functions.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Network Services Development Network Resource Provision 3 rd EGEE Conference, Athens, 20 th.
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 2 v3.1 Module 8 TCP/IP Suite Error and Control Messages.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE TNC 2005 Networking activities in EGEE Mathieu Goutelle (CNRS UREC, France) EGEE-SA2 activity.
Instructor Materials Chapter 7: EIGRP Tuning and Troubleshooting
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance
Inter domain signaling protocol
SLR, SLS and SLA issues Afrodite Sevasti SA2 participant
Establishing End-to-End Guaranteed Bandwidth Network Paths Across Multiple Administrative Domains The DOE-funded TeraPaths project at Brookhaven National.
Quality of Service in the Internet
Routing and Switching Essentials v6.0
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
EE 122: Lecture 18 (Differentiated Services)
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Presentation transcript:

INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Institution of SLAs TNLC Meeting ― Athens, Afrodite Sevasti (SA2, GRNET)

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Model Network Service Instance (NSI) refers to every instance of a distinct flow or aggregate of EGEE traffic being transported between two end-points located in two distant EGEE RCs. NSIs are active between two EGEE RCs at a specific point in time, as a result of corresponding equal in number requests made by the EGEE middleware. The GEANT/NREN community can currently offer two types of border-to-border services: –Best-Effort IP service –Premium IP service

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Services It is recommended that all EGEE NSIs are served using Premium IP service. However, there is also the possibility for an NSI to be served using the Best-Effort IP service All domains involved in network services provisioning to EGEE as part of the existing network infrastructure hierarchy have to be categorized as to whether they –Compliant with the Premium IP service –Supportive of the Premium IP service –Indifferent to the Premium IP service

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting PIP compliant domain A domain provides Premium IP service to an EGEE NSI by following a set of basic principles as listed here: –IP traffic belonging to a single NSI and served by Premium IP service is classified and its packets are being policed –Each router of the domain serves packets of PIP-served NSIs via a dedicated router queue; –Each router queue dedicated to serving Premium IP traffic must be able to accommodate the maximum of Premium IP traffic that can be routed through it; –For Premium IP traffic of NSIs, it is possible to measure the achievable bandwidth and provide statistical measurements for a set of quality metrics between two edges of the domain. –It must be capable of performing admission control on each new NSI request from an ingress interface to an egress interface of the domain.

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Non PIP compliant domains Definition of a PIP supportive domain –Preserving marking of PIP packets –Operating in an over-provisioned manner. –Monitoring of performance Definition of a PIP indifferent domain –Might alter the DSCP field value in packet headers –Might serve NSI traffic over congested links (and thus compromise NSI requested guarantees such as guaranteed bandwidth) –Lack of monitoring infrastructure A Premium IP indifferent domain can be part of the end-to-end path that the packets of an NSI traverse, however this automatically degrades the IP connectivity network service provided to the NSI from PIP to Best-Effort.

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting NSI establishment For every case where it is required that an amount of data is transferred from one EGEE RC to another either in bulk transfer mode or in a real-time transmission mode an NSI request is made. If the NSI request is accepted, the NSI is established For each NSI an end-to-end SLA is established that provides all the technical and administrative details for maintaining, monitoring and troubleshooting the NSI. This SLA is formed using the individual SLAs provided by all domains along the end-to-end path

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Scenarios

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Responsibilities GEANT-NRENs cloud –NIS request processing by each domain along the border-to-border part of the path. –If all three domains are able to confirm that the NSI request can be honored, the acceptance of the request together with a border-to- border SLA will be returned to the ENOC responsible, for each specific NSI Non-GEANT/NREN cloud domains –In case of a PIP compliant or PIP supportive domain:  use its admission control mechanism to examine whether the appropriate resources are available in order to accommodate the request  perform necessary configurations (in the case of a PIP compliant domain) to serve the NSI  fill in the corresponding SLA template (depending on whether the domain is PIP compliant or PIP supportive) for the NSI and return it to the ENOC contact point –In case of a PIP indifferent domain:  ENOC is notified as part of the normal process of collecting per-domain SLAs to produce the end-to-end SLA.  The end-to-end SLA is still established by the ENOC however it provides Best Effort IP service to the particular NSI

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting SLA templates SLA template for a Premium IP compliant domain SLA template for a Premium IP supportive domain SLA template for a Premium IP indifferent domain EGEE end-to-end SLA template

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Establishment of SLAs

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting End-to-end SLA establishment & the EGEE middleware

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI TNLC meeting Other issues Monitoring of SLAs –Each domain is responsible for monitoring its network services’ provisioning according to the SLA it offers and whether it is a PIP compliant, PIP supportive or PIP indifferent domain –It is left to the EGEE RCs to install and/or run application oriented tests to verify the performance of the end-to-end path Fault reporting and troubleshooting of SLAs –In case of faults or degradation of performance, usually perceived by by those involving in an NSI VOs/RCs, the problem must be directly reported to the ENOC –The ENOC is responsible for deciding where the problem might be located and notifying the Technical Contact(s) of one or more of the domains along the path. Quotas Disqualifying a domain